3 research outputs found

    The effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with New York Heart Association class IV non-ambulatory heart failure

    Get PDF
    Background: We reviewed the effectiveness and safety of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV non-ambulatory heart failure (NAHF). Methods: From 2006 to 2011, 310 patients underwent CRT at Kobe University Hospital and Himeji Cardiovascular Center because of heart failure. Of these, 29 NAHF patients were retrospectively analyzed. The control group comprised 21 age- and ejection fraction-matched patients with NAHF who did not undergo CRT from the ICU database of Kobe University Hospital. The primary endpoint was all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure. Response was defined as a >15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). Results: CRT was performed successfully without serious complications in all patients. Twenty-three patients (79%) were discharged 19±15 days after CRT implantation, while 6 (21%) died during their hospital stay due to progressive heart failure. Compared with the control group, patients in the CRT group showed significant improvements in the primary endpoint (log-rank p=0.04). Six patients (21%) were defined as responders and the Kaplan–Meier curve showed that responders experienced a better outcome than non-responders (log-rank p=0.029). LV dyssynchrony before implantation was significantly related to the occurrence of the primary endpoint (p=0.02). Conclusions: CRT can be safely used in patients with NAHF and can improve long-term patient outcomes, especially in treatment responders

    Incidence of esophageal injury after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with a low body mass index and esophageal temperature monitoring at a 39 °C setting

    No full text
    Background: Esophageal injury following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is reported to occur in 35% of patients. Even with a low energy setting (20–25 W), lesions develop in 10% of patients. Body mass index (BMI) has been reported to be a predictor of esophageal injury, indicating that patients with a low BMI (<24.9 kg/m2) are at a higher risk. We hypothesized that catheter ablation with a lower energy setting of 20 W controlled by esophageal temperature monitoring (ETM) at 39 °C could prevent esophageal injury even in patients with a BMI <24.9 kg/m2. Methods: Twenty patients with AF were included (age, 63±8 years; BMI, 22.9±1.3 kg/m2, left atrium diameter, 44±11 mm). If the esophageal temperature probe registered a temperature of >39 °C, radiofrequency (RF) application was stopped immediately. RF application could be performed in a “point by point” manner for a maximum of 20 s. Endoscopy was performed 1–5 days after ablation. Results: Esophageal mucosal injury was not observed in any patient in the study. Conclusions: Catheter ablation using ETM reduced the incidence of esophageal injuries, even in patients with a low BMI
    corecore