104 research outputs found

    Effects of Asm-024, A Modulator of Acetylcholine Receptor Function, On Airway Responsiveness and Allergen-Induced Responses in Patients with Mild Asthma

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, tolerability and clinical activity of ASM-024, a new cholinergic compound with dual nicotinic and muscarinic activity, in mild allergic asthma

    The Effect of PPAR Agonists on the Migration of Mature and Immature Eosinophils

    Get PDF
    PPARγ agonists can either enhance or inhibit eosinophil migration, which is a sum of directional migration (chemotaxis) and random cell movement (chemokinesis). To date, the effects of PPAR agonists on chemokinesis have not been examined. This study investigates the effects of PPARα, δ, and γ agonists on eosinophil migration and chemokinesis. Eosinophils purified from blood of atopic donors were preincubated with rosiglitazone (PPARγ agonist), GW9578 (PPARα agonist), GW501516 (PPARδ agonist), or diluent. The effects of PPAR agonists were examined on eosinophil chemokinesis, eotaxin-induced migration of eosinophils, and migration of IL-5Rα+ CD34+ cells. Expressions of CCR3, phospho-p38, phospho-ERK, and calcium release were also measured in eosinophils after rosiglitazone treatment. Low concentrations of rosiglitazone, but not GW9578 or GW501516, increased chemokinesis of eosinophils (P=0.0038), and SDF-1α-induced migration of immature eosinophils (P=0.0538). Rosiglitazone had an effect on eosinophil calcium flux but had no effect on expression of CCR3 or phosphorylation of p38 or ERK. In contrast, high concentrations of rosiglitazone inhibited eosinophil migration (P=0.0042). The effect of rosiglitazone on eosinophil migration and chemokinesis appears to be through modification of calcium signaling, which alludes to a novel PPAR-mediated mechanism to modulate eosinophil function

    T helper 17 cells and related cytokines after allergen inhalation challenge in allergic asthmatics.

    No full text
    &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Background:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; T helper (Th)17 cells may play a role in allergic asthma. This study assessed the effect of allergen inhalation challenge on circulating Th17 cells and related cytokines in allergic asthmatics. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from 16 atopic asthmatics before and 24 h after allergen challenge, as well as from 10 atopic nonasthmatics and 10 normal controls. Cells were stained for Th17 cytokines and their receptors (IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, IL-17R, and IL-23R) using flow cytometry. Cytokine concentrations from cell culture supernatants were quantified using a multiplex assay for IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, and IL-23. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; At baseline, asthmatics had a higher percentage of circulating Th17 cells (1.2 ± 0.5%) compared to normal controls (0.9 ± 0.66%, p &lt; 0.001) but not compared to atopic nonasthmatics (1.13 ± 0.5%). There was a significant increase in Th17 cells in asthmatics after allergen challenge to 1.55 ± 0.4% (p &lt; 0.05) and a trend toward significance in IL-17R expression from 3.4 ± 4.3 to 6.86 ± 6.84% after allergen challenge (p = 0.06). There was also a significant reduction in IL-21-positive cells following allergen challenge from 3.46 ± 1.85 to 2.33 ± 1.37% (p &lt; 0.001). There were no significant differences in IL-17F, IL-22 and IL-23R expression. The concentration of IL-17A in culture supernatant was significantly higher in asthmatics compared to normal controls and IL-17A significantly increased 24 h after allergen challenge. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; The increase of Th17 cells and IL-17A in atopic asthma after allergen inhalation challenge suggests a possible role for Th17 in allergen-induced airway responses.</jats:p

    IL-4 and IL-13 differentially regulate TLR-induced eosinophil-basophil differentiation of cord blood CD34+ progenitor cells.

    No full text
    Intrauterine environmental exposures have been shown to influence neonatal immunity and subsequent allergic disease development. We have previously shown that fewer lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated eosinophil-basophil (Eo/B) colonies grow from cord blood (CB) of high-atopic risk infants, compared to low-atopic risk infants. In the present study, we investigated whether a surrogate ex vivo TH2 milieu (i.e., either IL-4 or IL-13) could represent an underlying mechanism to explain our previous findings. CB CD34+ cells from healthy donors were cultured with IL-4 or IL-13 (in combination with LPS) and assessed for Eo/B differentiation using methylcellulose cultures and flow cytometry for related intracellular signalling pathways. Pharmacological inhibitors were added to the methylcellulose cultures to determine the effect of blocking intracellular signalling in CB CD34+ cells in relation to Eo/B colony forming unit (CFU) formation. Stimulation of CD34+ cells with IL-4, but not IL-13, reduced Eo/B CFU formation in the presence of LPS; this was found to be dependent on IL-4Rα and not IL-13Rα1. Additionally, IL-4 reduced the expression of ERK 1/2 after LPS stimulation, which was recovered by inhibition of IL-4Rα. While IL-13 did not have an inhibitory effect on ERK 1/2 expression, inhibition of ERK 1/2 significantly reduced Eo/B CFU formation. Thus, the responsiveness of CB CD34+ progenitor cells to LPS is differentially regulated by the TH2 cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13. This may have implications for in utero interactions between placental-derived pro-allergic cytokines and neonatal progenitor cells influencing Eo/B-mediated inflammatory responses in early life
    corecore