Standardization of the tumor-stroma ratio scoring method for breast cancer research

Purpose: The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) has repeatedly proven to be correlated with patient outcomes in breast cancer using large retrospective cohorts. However, studies validating the TSR often show variability in methodology, thereby hampering comparisons and uniform outcomes. Method: This paper provides a detailed description of a simple and uniform TSR scoring method using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained core biopsies and resection tissue, specifically focused on breast cancer. Possible histological challenges that can be encountered during scoring including suggestions to overcome them are reported. Moreover, the procedure for TSR estimation in lymph nodes, scoring on digital images and the automatic assessment of the TSR using artificial intelligence are described. Conclusion: Digitized scoring of tumor biopsies and resection material offers interesting future perspectives to determine patient prognosis and response to therapy. The fact that the TSR method is relatively easy, quick, and cheap, offers great potential for its implementation in routine diagnostics, but this requires high quality validation studies

The intra-tumoral stroma in patients with breast cancer increases with age

Purpose The tumor microenvironment in older patients is subject to changes. The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) was evaluated in order to estimate the amount of intra-tumoral stroma and to evaluate the prognostic value of the TSR in older patients with breast cancer (≥70 years). Methods Two retrospective cohorts, the FOCUS study (N = 619) and the Nottingham Breast Cancer series (N = 1793), were used for assessment of the TSR on hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue slides. Results The intra-tumoral stroma increases with age in the FOCUS study and the Nottingham Breast Cancer series (B 0.031, 95% CI 0.006-0.057, P = 0.016 and B 0.034, 95% CI 0.015-0.054, P ≤ 0.001, respectively). Fifty-one percent of the patients from the Nottingham Breast Cancer series ≤40 years had a stroma-high tumor compared to 73% of the patients of ≥90 years from the FOCUS study. The TSR did not validate as an independent prognostic parameter in patients ≥70 years. Conclusions The intra-tumoral stroma increases with age. This might be the result of an activated tumor microenvironment. The TSR did not validate as an independent prognostic parameter in patients ≥70 years in contrast to young women with breast cancer as published previously

Serum-based measurements of stromal activation through ADAM12 associate with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND Recently it has been recognized that stromal markers could be used as a clinically relevant biomarker for therapy response and prognosis. Here, we report on a serum marker for stromal activation, A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease 12 (ADAM12) in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS Using gene expression databases we investigated ADAM12 expression in CRC and delineated the source of ADAM12 expression. The clinical value of ADAM12 was retrospectively assessed in the CAIRO2 trial in metastatic CRC with 235 patients (31% of total cohort), and an independent rectal cancer cohort (n = 20). RESULTS ADAM12 is expressed by activated CRC associated fibroblasts. In the CAIRO2 trial cohort, ADAM12 serum levels were prognostic (ADAM12 low versus ADAM12 high; median OS 25.3 vs. 17.1 months, HR 1.48 [95% CI 1.11-1.96], P = 0.007). The prognostic potential was specifically high for metastatic rectal cancer (HR 1.78 [95% CI 1.06-3.00], P = 0.030) and mesenchymal subtype tumors (HR 2.12 [95% CI 1.25-3.60], P = 0.004). ADAM12 also showed potential for predicting recurrence in an exploratory analysis of non-metastatic rectal cancers. CONCLUSIONS Here we describe a non-invasive marker for activated stroma in CRC which associates with poor outcome, especially for primary cancers located in the rectum

The prognostic value of the tumor–stroma ratio is most discriminative in patients with grade III or triple‐negative breast cancer

The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) was evaluated as a promising parameter for breast cancer prognostication in clinically relevant subgroups of patients. The TSR was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue slides of 1794 breast cancer patients from the Nottingham City Hospital. An independent second cohort of 737 patients from the Netherlands Cancer Institute to Antoni van Leeuwenhoek was used for evaluation. In the Nottingham Breast Cancer series, the TSR was an independent prognostic parameter for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.66, p = 0.004). The interaction term was statistically significant for grade and triple-negative status. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a more pronounced effect of the TSR for RFS in grade III tumors (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.51, p < 0.001) and triple-negative tumors (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.14, p = 0.020). Comparable hazard ratios and confidence intervals were observed for grade and triple-negative status in the ONCOPOOL study. The prognostic value of TSR was not modified by age, tumor size, histology, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status or lymph node status. In conclusion, patients with a stroma-high tumor had a worse prognosis compared to patients with a stroma- low tumor. The prognostic value of the TSR is most discriminative in grade III tumors and triple-negative tumors. The TSR was not modified by other clinically relevant parameters making it a potential factor to be included for improved risk stratification

High-Throughput and High-Sensitivity Mass Spectrometry-Based N-Glycomics of Mammalian Cells

The current protocols for glycomic analysis of cells often require a large quantity of material (5-20 million cells). In order to analyze the N-glycosylation from small amounts of cells (≤1 million) as obtained from, for example, primary cell lines or cell sorting, and in a higher throughput approach, we set up a robust 96-well format PVDF-membrane based N-glycan release protocol followed by linkage-specific sialic acid stabilization, cleanup, and MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. We further evaluated the influence of PNGase F incubation time on the N-glycan profile

Prognostic value of low CDX2 expression in colorectal cancers with a high stromal content – a short report

Purpose: Lack of expression of the intestinal transcription factor CDX2 in colorectal cancer (CRC) identifies patients with a poor prognosis. This biomarker has previously been suggested to be prognostic in CRCs with a high stromal content based on mRNA expression data. We investigated the prognostic value of CDX2 expression in microsatellite stable CRC stratified by stromal content using microscopy-based techniques. Methods and results: The study included a cohort of 236 patients with stage I-IV CRC. We assessed by microscopy the tumour-stroma ratio (TSR) and the immunohistochemical CDX2 intensity. We found that patients of the stroma-high group had a worse prognosis compared to those of the stroma-low group [disease-free survival in a multivariate analysis (DFS multivariate ) HR 1.52 (95% CI 1.05–2.21)]. In our cohort, low CDX2 expression (14.6%) showed prognostic value for DFS multivariate [HR 1.93 (95% CI 1.16–3.23)]. Interestingly, when stratifying the cohort by TSR, no prognostic difference was observed related to CDX2 expression in stroma-low tumours. However, CDX2 expression was found to be prognostic within the stroma-high group [DFS multivariate HR 3.02 (95% CI 1.49–6.13)]. The p value for interaction between TSR and CDX2 status was borderline significant in DFS (p = 0.071). Conclusions: The present study confirms a poor outcome of patients with stroma-high tumours. Low CDX2 expression in tumours with a high stromal content identified patients with a particularly poor prognosis. The present study did not reveal a clear difference in TSR associated with CDX2 status and survival. This method, solely based on microscopy, identifies patients who have a high risk of relapse and a poor outcome, and who may benefit from targeted therapy

Correlation of the tumour-stroma ratio with diffusion weighted MRI in rectal cancer

Imatges per ressonància magnètica; Neoplàsies rectals; Microambient tumoralImagen de resonancia magnética; Neoplasias rectales; Microambiente tumoralMagnetic Resonance Imaging; Rectal neoplasms; Tumor MicroenvironmentObjective This study evaluated the correlation between intratumoural stroma proportion, expressed as tumour-stroma ratio (TSR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with rectal cancer. Methods This multicentre retrospective study included all consecutive patients with rectal cancer, diagnostically confirmed by biopsy and MRI. The training cohort (LUMC, Netherlands) included 33 patients and the validation cohort (VHIO, Spain) 69 patients. Two observers measured the mean and minimum ADCs based on single-slice and whole-volume segmentations. The TSR was determined on diagnostic haematoxylin & eosin stained slides of rectal tumour biopsies. The correlation between TSR and ADC was assessed by Spearman correlation ( r s ). Results The ADC values between stroma-low and stroma-high tumours were not significantly different. Intra-class correlation (ICC) demonstrated a good level of agreement for the ADC measurements, ranging from 0.84–0.86 for single slice and 0.86–0.90 for the whole-volume protocol. No correlation was observed between the TSR and ADC values, with ADC mean r s = -0.162 ( p= 0.38) and ADC min r s = 0.041 ( p= 0.82) for the single-slice and r s = -0.108 ( p= 0.55) and r s = 0.019 ( p= 0.92) for the whole-volume measurements in the training cohort, respectively. Results from the validation cohort were consistent; ADC mean r s = -0.022 ( p= 0.86) and ADC min r s = 0.049 ( p= 0.69) for the single-slice and r s = -0.064 ( p= 0.59) and r s = -0.063 ( p= 0.61) for the whole-volume measurements. Conclusions Reproducibility of ADC values is good. Despite positive reports on the correlation between TSR and ADC values in other tumours, this could not be confirmed for rectal cancer.This study received financial support from “ Genootschap Landgoed Keukenhof .” Author R.P.L.’s work is supported by a PCF-Young Investigator Award . The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript