Evaluation of short-term efficacy of extraspinal cementoplasty for bone metastasis: A monocenter study of 31 patients

Objective: To study the effect on pain of per-cutaneous cementoplasty for painful extraspinal bone metastasis. Method: 43 patients with extraspinal bone metastasis were included between April 2006 and October 2014 in this retrospective monocenter study. The primary endpoint was pain level measured on a 0–10 numeric rating scale at week 1 after cementoplasty as compared with pre-cementoplasty. Secondary endpoints were long-term pain level and impact on quality of life and disability. Results: Mean pain score was 4.2 (SD ±3.6) before cementoplasty and 1.09 (SD ±2.4) at week 1 (p = 0.005) (n = 31 patients). At 22 months after cementoplasty, quality of life and disability improved (according to the patient global assessment) for 47.6% and 52.2% of patients (n = 21patients). We did not find a predictor of good response. Cement leakage was the most common adverse event. Conclusion: Percutaneous cementoplasty of extraspinal bone metastasis is a rapidly efficient treatment with few adverse events. Its efficacy persists over time, with a benefit for disability and quality of life. Although this technique is only palliative, it should be considered in this situation. Keywords: Percutaneous cementoplasty, Bone metastasis, Pain managemen

Routine Molecular Screening of Patients with Advanced Non-SmallCell Lung Cancer in Circulating Cell-Free DNA at Diagnosis and During Progression Using OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 and NGS Technologies

International audienceBackground and objectives: The use of ultra-sensitive diagnostic tests to detect clinically actionable somatic alterations within the gene encoding the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) within circulating cell-free DNA is an important first step in determining the eligibility of patients with non-small cell lung cancer to receive tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Methods: We present the clinical validation (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity) of a highly sensitive OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 test, which we compare to a custom next-generation sequencing assay, for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. The OncoBEAMTM digital-polymerase chain reaction method detects 36 different EGFR alterations in circulating cell-free DNA, whereas the next-generation sequencing assay covers major solid tumor oncodrivers. Of the 540 samples analyzed with the OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 test, 42.4% of patients had undergone molecular testing at diagnosis (N = 229/540) and 57.7% of patients during disease progression (N = 311/540).Results: The sensitivity and specificity were measured for this BEAMing assay. The number of mutant beads and mutant allelic fraction were measured for each EGFR alteration and the level of detection was established at 0.1% for a median of 2861 genome equivalent (GE) in each reaction using HD780 horizon control DNA, as well as by an internal quality reference standard. Approximately 10%, 27%, and 63% of the 540 samples contained 3000 GE, which corresponded to a maximal assay sensitivity of 2.0%, 0.5-0.1%, and 0.1-0.05% mutant allelic fraction, respectively. In a routine hospital setting, 11.4% of non-small cell lung cancer tumors were positive at diagnosis for EGFR alterations, while 43.7% samples harbored EGFR mutations at progression, among which 40.3% expressed EGFR resistance mutations after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment with first- and second-generation drugs.Conclusions: The OncoBEAMTM EGFR V2 is a sensitive, robust, and accurate assay that delivers reproducible results. Next-generation sequencing and BEAMing technologies act complementarily in the routine molecular screening. We show that using a next-generation sequencing assay, despite its lower sensitivity, enables the identification of rare EGFR alterations or resistance mechanisms (mutation, deletion, insertion, and copy number variation) to orient first- and second-line treatments

Assessment of Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Outpatients Taking Oral Anticancer Drugs Included in the Real-Life Oncoral Program

International audienceBackground In previous studies, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been shown to improve survival in cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to assess symptoms potentially related to adverse events experienced by cancer outpatients treated by oral anticancer agents (OAAs) using PROs. Methods Between September 2018 and May 2019, outpatients starting OAAs were included in a 12-week follow-up to assess 15 symptoms listed in the National Cancer Institute PRO Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, using a 5-point scale of severity or frequency. Patients were requested to alert a referral nurse or pharmacist when they self-assessed high-level (level 3 or 4) symptoms. Results 407 questionnaires were completed by 63 patients in which 2333 symptoms were reported. Almost three-quarters (74.6%) reported at least one high-level symptom. The symptoms that were most commonly experienced were fatigue (>9 in 10 patients; 13.2% of symptoms declared), various psychological disorders (>9 in 10 patients; 28.6% of symptoms declared) and general pain (>8 in 10 patients; 9.4% of symptoms declared). Conclusion PROs are appropriate to detect potential adverse events in cancer outpatients treated by OAAs. This study is the first step for integrating the patient’s perspective in a digital e-health device in routine oncology care