Cloning of a Novel Protein Interacting with BRS-3 and Its Effects in Wound Repair of Bronchial Epithelial Cells

Bombesin receptor subtype 3 (BRS-3), the orphan bombesin receptor, may play a role in the regulation of stress responses in lung and airway epithelia. Bombesin receptor activated protein (BRAP )is a novel protein we found in our previous study which interacts with BRS-3. This study was designed to observe the subcellular location and wound repair function of BRAP in human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs). BRAP ORF was amplified by RT-PCR and ligated to pEGFP-C1 vector, and then the recombinant plasmid pEGFP-C1-BRAP was transfected into Hela cells. The location of BRAP protein was observed by laser confocal microscope, and the expression of it was analyzed by Western-blot. At the same time,we built the recombinant plasmid pcDNA3.1(+)-BRAP, transfected it into HBECs and observed its impact on cell cycle and wound repair of HBECs. The results showed that BRAP locates in membrane and cytoplasm and increases significantly in transfected cells. Flow cytometry results demonstrated that the recombinant plasmid increases S phase plus G2 phase of cell cycle by 25%. Microscopic video analysis system showed that the repair index of wounded HBECs increases by 20% through stable expression of BRAP. The present study demonstrated that BRAP locates in the membrane and cytoplasm, suggesting that this protein is a cytoplasm protein, which promotes cell cycle and wound repair of HBECs

Leupaxin is similar to paxillin in focal adhesion targeting and tyrosine phosphorylation but has distinct roles in cell adhesion and spreading

Focal adhesion (FA) formation is induced by extracellular matrix-stimulated integrin clustering and activation of receptors for diffusible factors. Leupaxin (LPXN) is a member of the paxillin family of FA proteins expressed in many cancer cell lines. We found activation of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr) by bombesin (BN) stimulated LPXN translocation from cytoplasm to FAs. Using mutagenesis, we identified LIM3 as the primary FA targeting domain for LPXN and showed BN-induced LPXN tyrosine phosphorylation on residues 22, 62 and 72. A LIM3 point mutant of LPXN failed to target to FAs and had no BN-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation. Conversely, a non-phosphorylatable mutant (Y22/62/72F) translocated to FAs after BN addition. Stimulation of FA formation using vinblastine also induced LPXN translocation and tyrosine phosphorylation. Therefore, dynamic LPXN tyrosine phosphorylation requires translocation to FAs. LPXN and paxillin had opposite roles in adhesion to collagen I (CNI) in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. LPXN siRNA stimulated whereas paxillin siRNA inhibited cell adhesion. Knockdown of both LPXN and paxillin behaved similarly to paxillin knockdown alone, suggesting LPXN's function in adhesion might depend on paxillin. Additionally, LPXN regulated cell spreading on CNI but not on fibronectin whereas paxillin knockdown suppressed spreading on both substrates. These results demonstrate that although LPXN and paxillin's FA targeting and tyrosine phosphorylation are similar, each protein has distinct functions

Anticipatory Cues Differentially Provoke In Vivo Peptidergic and Monoaminergic Release at the Medial Prefrontal Cortex

Like primary reinforcers, the anticipation of reward ought to affect neurochemical release in brain regions, such as the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), which are associated with appraisal processes. To assess the neurochemical changes associated with anticipation, rats were exposed to the pairing of auditory (60-dB white noise), visual, and olfactory cues with the daily presentation of a palatable snack (Cue Relevant group). Rats of a second group were similarly trained, but for a 2-week period, the snack was no longer provided following cue presentation (Extinction group). In the third condition, the presentation of the snack and cues was uncorrelated (Cue Irrelevant group). Analyses of dialysates collected in vivo from the mPFC revealed that release of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), and the 5-HT catabolite, 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA), had increased bilaterally in response to the anticipatory cues, whereas DA release increased only within the right mPFC. In the case of CRH and GRP, these increases were also apparent in the extinction condition, despite the fact that behavioral arousal to the anticipatory cues (increased exploration, rearing, grooming, and vigilance) was only evident in the Cue Relevant condition. In contrast, the elevated DA and 5-HIAA were apparent exclusively in the Cue Relevant condition. Thus, CRH and GRP systems may serve to allocate salience and/or incentive reward value to biologically significant stimuli or reflect the emotional response to the anticipatory stimulus. The activity of DA and 5-HT neurons, in contrast, is more closely aligned with the cognitive appraisal of predictor stimuli