WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity

BACKGROUND: Health care planning for chronic pelvic pain (CPP), an important cause of morbidity amongst women is hampered due to lack of clear collated summaries of its basic epidemiological data. We systematically reviewed worldwide literature on the prevalence of different types of CPP to assess the geographical distribution of data, and to explore sources of variation in its estimates. METHODS: We identified data available from Medline (1966 to 2004), Embase (1980 to 2004), PsycINFO (1887 to 2003), LILACS (1982 to 2004), Science Citation index, CINAHL (January 1980 to 2004) and hand searching of reference lists. Two reviewers extracted data independently, using a piloted form, on participants' characteristics, study quality and rates of CPP. We considered a study to be of high quality (valid) if had at least three of the following features: prospective design, validated measurement tool, adequate sampling method, sample size estimation and response rate >80%. We performed both univariate and multivariate meta-regression analysis to explore heterogeneity of results across studies. RESULTS: There were 178 studies (459975 participants) in 148 articles. Of these, 106 studies were (124259 participants) on dysmenorrhoea, 54 (35973 participants) on dyspareunia and 18 (301756 participants) on noncyclical pain. There were only 19/95 (20%) less developed and 1/45 (2.2%) least developed countries with relevant data in contrast to 22/43 (51.2%) developed countries. Meta-regression analysis showed that rates of pain varied according to study quality features. There were 40 (22.5%) high quality studies with representative samples. Amongst them, the rate of dysmenorrhoea was 16.8 to 81%, that of dyspareunia was 8 to 21.8%, and that for noncyclical pain was 2.1 to 24%. CONCLUSION: There were few valid population based estimates of disease burden due to CPP from less developed countries. The variation in rates of CPP worldwide was due to variable study quality. Where valid data were available, a high disease burden of all types of pelvic pain was found

The contribution of RCTs to quality management and their feasibility in practice

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is generally accepted as the most reliable method of conducting clinical research. To obtain an unbiased evaluation of the effectiveness of spine surgery, patients should be randomly assigned to either new or standard treatment. The aim of the present article is to provide a short overview of the advantages and challenges of RCTs and to present a summary of the conclusions of the Cochrane Reviews in spine surgery and later published trials in order to evaluate their contribution to quality management and feasibility in practice. From the searches, 130 RCTs were included, 95 from Cochrane Reviews and systematic reviews, and 35 from additional search. No study comparing surgery with sham surgery was identified. The first RCT in spine surgery was published in 1974 and compared debridement and ambulatory treatment in tuberculosis of the spine. The contribution of RCTs in spinal surgery has markedly increased over the last 10 years, which indicates that RCTs are feasible in this field. The results demonstrate missing quality specifications. Despite the number of published trials there is conflicting or limited evidence to support various techniques of instrumentation. The only intervention that receives strong evidence is discectomy for faster relief in carefully selected patients due to lumbar disc prolapse with sciatica. For future trials, authors, referees, and editors are recommended to follow the CONSORT statement. RCTs provide evidence to support clinical opinions before implementation of new techniques, but the individual clinical experience is still important for the doctor who has to face the patient

Sucrose mobilisation in sugarcane stalk induced by heterotrophic axillary bud growth

A theoretical high-yield sugarcane biofactory can be idealised as containing culm tissue that functions as a secondary source tissue rather than a sink. To investigate this potential process, heterotrophic axillary bud outgrowth from sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) setts was used as a model system to demonstrate that sucrose is a mobilisable carbon source. The outgrowth and subsequent biomass accumulation of axillary buds from two-eye setts of mature sugarcane stalks grown in the dark was used to measure carbon mobilisation from sett internode pith tissue. After 42 days growth 99.0 +/- 0.72% of sett internode pith sucrose was depleted and 2.66 +/- 0.16 g of new tissue accumulated. Comparison with a control treatment in which axillary buds were excised at day zero demonstrated that carbon mobilisation was driven by the accumulation of new biomass. Profiling of soluble carbohydrates (viz. sucrose, glucose and fructose), starch, total soluble protein, total amino nitrogen, free amino acids and total insoluble material showed that the sucrose stored in the sett internode pith was the only available carbon source of sufficient size at day zero for the observed biomass accumulation. Other metabolites mobilised were glucose, fructose and some amino acids, notably isoleucine and leucine that were depleted in shoot treatment setts at day 42