13 research outputs found

    On Alternative Problem Formulations for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization

    No full text
    In this paper we introduce a perspective on multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) problem formulation that provides a basis for choosing among existing formulations and suggests provocative, new ones. MDO problems offer a richer spectrum of possibilities for problem formulation than do single discipline design optimization problems, or multidisciplinary analysis problems. This is because the variables and the equations that characterize the MDO problem can be "partitioned" in some interesting ways between what we traditionally think of as the "analysis code(s)" and the "optimization code." An MDO approach can be characterized by what part of the overall computation is done in each code, how that computation is done, and what information is communicated between the codes

    Evo-devo and the search for homology (“sameness”) in biological systems

    Full text link
    Developmental biology and evolutionary studies have merged into evolutionary developmental biology ("evo-devo”). This synthesis already influenced and still continues to change the conceptual framework of structural biology. One of the cornerstones of structural biology is the concept of homology. But the search for homology ("sameness”) of biological structures depends on our favourite perspectives (axioms, paradigms). Five levels of homology ("sameness”) can be identified in the literature, although they overlap to some degree: (i) serial homology (homonomy) within modular organisms, (ii) historical homology (synapomorphy), which is taken as the only acceptable homology by many biologists, (iii) underlying homology (i.e., parallelism) in closely related taxa, (iv) deep evolutionary homology due to the "same” master genes in distantly related phyla, and (v) molecular homology exclusively at gene level. The following essay gives emphasis on the heuristic advantages of seemingly opposing perspectives in structural biology, with examples mainly from comparative plant morphology. The organization of the plant body in the majority of angiosperms led to the recognition of the classical root-shoot model. In some lineages bauplan rules were transcended during evolution and development. This resulted in morphological misfits such as the Podostemaceae, peculiar eudicots adapted to submerged river rocks. Their transformed "roots” and "shoots” fit only to a limited degree into the classical model which is based on either-or thinking. It has to be widened into a continuum model by taking over elements of fuzzy logic and fractal geometry to accommodate for lineages such as the Podostemacea
    corecore