A COMPARISON OF SINGLE PHOTON AND FULL WAVEFORM LIDAR

Single photon sensitive LiDAR sensors are currently competing with conventional multi-photon laser scanning systems. The advantage of the prior is the potentially higher area coverage performance, which comes at the price of an increased outlier rate and a lower ranging accuracy. In this contribution, the principles of both technologies are reviewed with special emphasis on their respective properties. In addition, a comparison of Single Photon LiDAR (SPL) and FullWaveform LiDAR data acquired in July and September 2018 in the City of Vienna are presented. From data analysis we concluded that (i) less flight strips are needed to cover the same area with comparable point density with SPL, (ii) the sharpness of the resulting 3D point cloud is higher for the waveform LiDAR dataset, (iii) SPL exhibits moderate vegetation penetration under leaf-on conditions, and (iv) the dispersion of the SPL point cloud assessed in smooth horizontal surface parts competes with waveform LiDAR but is higher by a factor of 2–3 for inclined and grassy surfaces, respectively. Still, SPL yielded satisfactory precision measures mostly below 10 cm

HYBRID ORIENTATION OF AIRBORNE LIDAR POINT CLOUDS AND AERIAL IMAGES

Airborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) and airborne photogrammetry are both proven and widely used techniques for the 3D topographic mapping of extended areas. Although both techniques are based on different reconstruction principles (polar measurement vs. ray triangulation), they ultimately serve the same purpose, the 3D reconstruction of the Earth’s surface, natural objects or infrastructure. It is therefore obvious for many applications to integrate the data from both techniques to generate more accurate and complete results. Many works have been published on this topic of data fusion. However, no rigorous integrated solution exists for the first two steps that need to be carried out after data acquisition, namely (a) the lidar strip adjustment and (b) the aerial triangulation. A consequence of solving these two optimization problems independently can be large discrepancies (of up to several decimeters) between the lidar block and the image block. This is especially the case in challenging situations, e.g. corridor mapping with one strip only or in case few or no ground control data. To avoid this problem and thereby profit from many other advantages, a first rigorous integration of these two tasks, the hybrid orientation of lidar point clouds and aerial images, is presented in this work

INVESTIGATING THE USE OF COASTAL BLUE IMAGERY FOR BATHYMETRIC MAPPING OF INLAND WATER BODIES

In this contribution, we report on an experimental airborne data acquisition with two medium format cameras (Coastal Blue, RGB) and a topo-bathymetric laser scanner for capturing the bathymetry of a dozen of groundwater supplied lakes located near Augsburg, Germany. The specific research question was to investigate whether the use of high-resolution Coastal Blue imagery (λ = 400–460 nm) provides added value for mapping bathymetry and characterization of water bottom features. While data processing is still in progress, preliminary results indicate that the blue (λ = 420–500 nm) and green (λ = 490–570 nm) color channels of the RGB camera are better suited for estimating bathymetry, but the Coastal Blue channel adds an additional water penetrating band increasing the number of useful band combinations with a positive effect on the water bottom classification capabilities. Whereas Coastal Blue channels are rather used from satellite platforms (Landsat 8, WorldView-2) with spatial resolutions in the meter range, our experiment aims at using higher resolution Coastal Blue imagery with a ground sampling distance of around 5 cm enabling not only spectrally based shallow water depth mapping but also the application of multi-media photogrammetry in high spatial resolution. To the best of our knowledge the use of high-resolution Coastal Blue captured from airborne platforms is novel in the context of mapping shallow water bathymetry

ULTRA-HIGH PRECISION UAV-BASED LIDAR AND DENSE IMAGE MATCHING

This paper presents a study on the potential of ultra-high accurate UAV-based 3D data capture. It is motivated by a project aiming at the deformation monitoring of a ship lock and its surrounding. This study is part of a research and development project initiated by the German Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG) in Koblenz in partnership with the Office of Development of Neckar River Heidelberg (ANH). For this first official presentation of the project, data from the first flight campaign will be analysed and presented. Despite the fact that monitoring aspects cannot be discussed before data from additional flight campaigns will be available later this year, our results from the first campaign highlight the potential of high-end UAV-based image and LiDAR sensors and their data fusion. So far, only techniques from engineering geodesy could fulfil the aspired accuracy demands in the range of millimetres. To the knowledge of the authors, this paper for the first time addresses such ultra-high accuracy applications by combing high precision UAV-based LiDAR and dense image matching. As the paper is written at an early stage of processing only preliminary results can be given here

Multimedia Photogrammetry with non-planar Water Surfaces – Accuracy Analysis on Simulation Basis

If multimedia-photogrammetry is used for the generation of point clouds of submerged objects or of the water bottom, Snell’s law has to be considered. When the images are taken from air, image rays are refracted at the air-water interface. This results in the collinearity equations being no longer valid. Bundle block adjustment can still be solved by adding additional terms considering Snell’s law. Existing approaches usually assume that the water surface is flat. Refractive indices and water height can either be measured separately or included as unknowns in the adjustment. However, when the water surface is not flat due to the presence of waves, assuming a planar water surface leads to large geometric errors. This work will analyze the significance of those errors and propose a way of including water surface parameters as unknowns into the bundle block adjustment, both based on simulated data. The simulation reproduces multiple images taken simultaneously, e.g. from synchronized UAV cameras or from cameras on tripods

Evaluation of Active and Passive UAV-Based Surveying Systems for Eulittoral Zone Mapping

The eulittoral zone, which alternates between being exposed and submerged, presents a challenge for high-resolution characterization. Normally, its mapping is divided between low and high water levels, where each calls for a different type of surveying instrument. This leads to inconsistent mapping products, both in accuracy and resolution. Recently, uncrewed airborne vehicle (UAV) based photogrammetry was suggested as an available and low-cost solution. However, relying on a passive sensor, this approach requires adequate environmental conditions, while its ability to map inundated regions is limited. Alternatively, UAV-based topo-bathymetric laser scanners enable the acquisition of both submerged and exposed regions independent of lighting conditions while maintaining the acquisition flexibility. In this paper, we evaluate the applicability of such systems in the eulittoral zone. To do so, both topographic and topo-bathymetric LiDAR sensors were loaded on UAVs to map a coastal region along the river Rhein. The resulting point clouds were compared to UAV-based photogrammetric ones. Aspects such as point spacing, absolute accuracy, and vertical offsets were analysed. To provide operative recommendations, each LiDAR scan was acquired at different flying altitudes, while the photogrammetric point clouds were georeferenced based on different exterior information configurations. To assess the riverbed modelling, we compared the surface model acquired by the topo-bathymetric LiDAR sensor to multibeam echosounder measurements. Our analysis shows that the accuracies of the LiDAR point clouds are hardly affected by flying altitude. The derived riverbed elevation, on the other hand, shows a bias which is linearly related to water depth