Long-term risk of recurrence in surgically treated intermediate-high risk renal cell carcinoma: a post-hoc analysis of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - American College of Radiology Imaging Network E2805 Trial cohort

Background: Surgical resection remains the gold standard treatment modality for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the optimal follow-up period in these individuals is controversial, and the current recommendations are based on retrospective data, which inevitably contain attrition bias. Our objective was to re-visit the recurrence rate of surgically treated intermediate-high risk RCC patients using randomized clinical trial data. MethodsWe performed a post-hoc analysis of all the patients that were included in the ECOG-ACRIN E2805 Trial. We assessed post-operative recurrence rates using the cumulative incidence method. Conditional estimates of a 36-month recurrence for patients whom did not have recurrence at set intervals following surgery was performed. Assessment of routinely available clinical and pathological features in predicting disease recurrence at time 0-months after surgery was compared it to that of the same features at 60-months after surgery.ResultsThe original cohort consisted of 1943 patients . Median follow-up for the 1508 patients whom were alive at the end of the study was 67.9 months (IQR 56.7 – 82.0). 730 patients developed disease recurrence. The 36-month cumulative incidence of recurrence was found to be 31.1% (IQR 29.3 – 33.6) for the entire cohort at 0-months from surgery. The rate changed to 26.0% (IQR 23.7 – 28.2), 18.8% (IQR 16.5 – 21.1), 16.1% (IQR 13.6 – 18.8), 18.9% (IQR 15.0 – 23.1) and 20.3% (IQR 12.5 – 28.1) for patients whom did not have recurrence at 12-, 24-, 36-, 48- and 60-months from surgery, respectively. At time 0-month from surgery, age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.02), pathologic T3/4 stage (HR: 1.557, 95%CI: 1.17 - 2.07), pathologic N1/2 stage (HR: 2.38, 95%CI: 1.85 - 3.07), Fuhrman grade 3 (HR: 1.36, 95%CI: 1.14 - 1.62) and Fuhrman grade 4 (HR: 2.41, 95%CI: 1.96 - 2.96) were independent predictors of recurrence. Conversely, none of the aforementioned covariates were predictors of disease recurrence at 60-months following surgery. Conclusions: Long-term follow-up, beyond 5-years, is supported by the findings within the present study. Also, the usual independent predictors that are frequently used to guide patient follow-up demonstrated validity immediately following surgery however lose their predictive power at 5 years from surgery.https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/merf2019clinres/1028/thumbnail.jp

Impact of treatment modality on overall survival in localized ductal prostate adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Ductal adenocarcinoma is considered a rare histological variant of prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa). Given the rarity of this subtype, optimal treatment strategies for men with nonmetastatic ductal PCa is largely unknown. We aimed to describe the impact of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy on overall survival (OS) in men with nonmetastatic ductal PCa. METHODS: We retrospectively selected 2209 cases of ductal PCa, diagnosed between 2004 and 2015, within the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Exclusion of metastatic patients yielded a total sample of 1993 individuals. Cox regression analysis tested the impact of treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy and no treatment) on OS. Covariates included age, race, Charlson comorbidity score (CCI), clinical T stage, biopsy Gleason score, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), and income. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to visualize the impact of treatment modality on OS. RESULTS: In men with nonmetastatic ductal PCa, median (IQR) age and PSA were 67 (61-74) years and 6.3 (4.3-10.8) ng/mL, respectively. Further, 9.8% (n=195) of patients presented with cT3 disease or higher, 3.4% (n=68) presented a CCI score ≥ 4, and 40.6% (808) presented with a Gleason biopsy score ≥ 4. Further, 1212 (60.8%) patients were treated surgically, 406 (20.4%) with radiotherapy, 102 (5.1%) with systemic therapies, and 273 (13.7%) received no treatment. Multivariable analysis showed that in comparison to men treated surgically, OS was significantly lower for patients receiving radiotherapy (HR 2.6; 95% CI 1.7-4.0) and systemic therapies (HR 9.1; 95% CI 5.0-16.5). Adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves are shown in the associated figure. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that in the rare ductal PCa variant, starting treatment with surgery offers more favorable long-term OS outcomes than radiotherapy and systemic therapies. While residual selection bias might persist after adjustment, the rarity of this disease precludes the possibility of a future trial, and the presented data represents the best available level of evidence on this topic

Admission Rates, Healthcare Utilization, and Economic Burden of Radiation Cystitis (RC) in the United States

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Radiation cystitis (RC) is a major cause of morbidity after radiotherapy for pelvic cancers. In the absence of a definite cure, patients may require repeated admissions, undergoing multiple - often morbid - urological procedures. Our aim was to study the inpatient economic burden and healthcare utilization associated with RC in the United States (US). METHODS: We focused on 13,272 records of adult (age \u3e= 18) patients with a diagnosis of RC within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2008- 2014. Patients with a concurrent diagnosis of other bladder conditions (n=914) were excluded. Due to a change in NIS sampling methodology in 2012, trend of RC-associated admissions was analyzed for 2012-2014. ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used to study inpatient procedures performed during admission. Complex survey procedures were used to study the descriptive characteristics of RC patients and the procedures received during admission. Inflation- adjusted cost for each admission and cumulative annual cost of RC-associated admissions were calculated for the study period. RESULTS: The 12,358 assessable patients represented 61,346 admissions for RC nationally per NIS survey weights. The number of admissions increased gradually from 1681 (weighted 8405) in 2012 to 1803 (weighted 9015) in 2014. Overall 84% of all RC-associated admissions were non-elective. 74% of the patients were males. A vast majority (82%) of the patients had Medicare/Medicaid insurance. The admissions were equally distributed between teaching (49%) and non-teaching (51%) hospitals, however, 90% of the admissions were in hospitals located in urban areas. Any RC-directed procedure code was recorded in 62% admissions. Of these, 3,331 (43%) admissions recorded more than one procedure code. Blood transfusion was the most frequently recorded code (33%), followed by transurethral procedures (28%) and cystoscopy (12.6%). Radical cystectomy was done in 1.3% of the admissions. The median length of stay was 4.4 days (IQR 2.2-8.4).The inflation-adjusted cost per admission was 9207 US dollars (IQR 5275 -17,573) overall, being higher in teaching hospitals (median 9802 vs 8463 US dollars in non-teaching hospitals. The cumulative cost of inpatient treatment of radiation cystitis was 63.5 million US dollars per year, amounting to a total of 952.2 million over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RC-associated admissions is rising in the US. This disease is a major burden to US healthcare. The awareness of the inpatient economic burden and healthcare utilization associated with RC may have funding implications.https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/merf2019qi/1020/thumbnail.jp

Managing Urology Consultations During COVID-19 Pandemic: Application of a Structured Care Pathway

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate a risk-stratified triage pathway for inpatient urology consultations during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. This pathway seeks to outline a urology patient care strategy that reduces the transmission risk to both healthcare providers and patients, reduces the healthcare burden, and maintains appropriate patient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consultations to the urology service during a 3-week period (March 16 to April 2, 2020) were triaged and managed via one of 3 pathways: Standard, Telemedicine, or High-Risk. Standard consults were in-person consults with non COVID-19 patients, High-Risk consults were in-person consults with COVID-19 positive/suspected patients, and Telemedicine consults were telephonic consults for low-acuity urologic issues in either group of patients. Patient demographics, consultation parameters and consultation outcomes were compared to consultations from the month of March 2019. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test and continuous variables using Mann-Whitney U test. A P value \u3c.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Between March 16 and April 2, 2020, 53 inpatient consultations were performed. By following our triage pathway, a total of 19/53 consultations (35.8%) were performed via Telemedicine with no in-person exposure, 10/53 consultations (18.9%) were High-Risk, in which we strictly controlled the urology team member in-person contact, and the remainder, 24/53 consultations (45.2%), were performed as Standard in-person encounters. COVID-19 associated consultations represented 18/53 (34.0%) of all consultations during this period, and of these, 8/18 (44.4%) were managed successfully via Telemedicine alone. No team member developed COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, most urology consultations can be managed in a patient and physician safety-conscious manner, by implementing a novel triage pathway

Donor site morbidity in oral mucosa graft urethroplasty: implications of tobacco consumption

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the donor site morbidity in patients who have undergone oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for stricture of the urethra. The impact of smoking and oral consumption of tobacco and/or <it>paan masala </it>on the donor site was also assessed. This study is probably the first of its kind where the affect of smoking, <it>paan masala </it>and tobacco chewing on the donor site morbidity has been documented.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Forty-eight patients suffering from stricture of the urethra underwent oral mucosa graft urethroplasty between July 2005 and December 2007. The patients were divided into two groups (users or non-users) based on tobacco consumption and oral hygiene. The donor site was evaluated at frequent intervals for pain, swelling, numbness, bleeding, salivation and tightness of mouth.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Donor site morbidity was more in users with poor oral hygiene. Pain scores were higher amongst the users and the morbidity persisted longer in the users compared to non-users with good oral hygiene.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Patients who consume tobacco and have poor oral hygiene should be warned regarding poorer outcomes after oral mucosa graft urethroplasty.</p

Peri-operative, functional and early oncologic outcomes of salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after high-intensity focused ultrasound partial ablation

BACKGROUND: Partial ablation of the prostate using high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU-PA) is a treatment option for localised prostate cancer. When local recurrence occurs, salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a treatment option for selected patients, but there is a paucity of data on the peri-operative safety, functional and oncologic outcomes of sRARP.. The objective of this study was therefore to describe peri-operative safety, functional and early oncologic outcomes following salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) for local recurrence after HIFU-PA. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 53 consecutive men who underwent sRARP after HIFU-PA from 2012 to 2018. Continence and erectile-function were reported pre-HIFU, pre-sRARP, 3-months post-sRARP and 12-months post-sRARP. Complications, PSMs and need for subsequent ADT/radiotherapy were assessed. RESULTS: 45 men were suitable for inclusion and had sufficient data for analyses. Median duration from HIFU to sRARP was 30.0 months and median follow-up post-sRARP was 17.7 months. Median age, PSA and ISUP group were 63.0 yrs., 7.2 ng/mL and 2; 88.9% were cT2. Median operative-console time, blood loss and hospital stay were 140 min, 200 ml and 1 day respectively. Clavien-Dindo grade 1, 2 and 3 complications 90d) complications occurred in 13.2%. At sRARP pathology, ISUP 3-5 occurred in 51.1%, pT3a/b in 64.5%, and PSMs in 44.4% (37.5% for pT2, 48.3% for pT3). Of men with > 3-months follow-up after sRARP, 26.3% underwent adjuvant radiotherapy/ADT for residual disease or adverse pathologic features; 5.3% experienced BCR requiring salvage ADT/radiotherapy. Freedom from ADT/radiotherapy was 66.7% at 12-months. Pad-free rates were 100% pre-HIFU, 95.3% post-HIFU, 29.4% 3-months post-sRARP, and 65.5% 12-months post-sRARP. Median IIEF-5 scores pre-HIFU, post-HIFU, 3- and 12-months post-sRARP were 23.5, 16, 5 and 5, respectively. Potency rates were 81.8, 65.5, 0 and 0%, respectively. Bilateral/unilateral nerve sparing were feasible in 7%/22%. CONCLUSION: Salvage RARP was safe with acceptable but sub-optimal continence and poor sexual-function and poor oncologic outcomes. One in three men required additional treatment within 12-months. This information may aid men and urologists with treatment selection and counselling regarding primary HIFU-PA vs primary RARP and when considering salvage RARP