A Semantic Graph-Based Approach for Radicalisation Detection on Social Media

From its start, the so-called Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL/ISIS) has been successfully exploiting social media networks, most notoriously Twitter, to promote its propaganda and recruit new members, resulting in thousands of social media users adopting a pro-ISIS stance every year. Automatic identification of pro-ISIS users on social media has, thus, become the centre of interest for various governmental and research organisations. In this paper we propose a semantic graph-based approach for radicalisation detection on Twitter. Unlike previous works, which mainly rely on the lexical representation of the content published by Twitter users, our approach extracts and makes use of the underlying semantics of words exhibited by these users to identify their pro/anti-ISIS stances. Our results show that classifiers trained from semantic features outperform those trained from lexical, sentiment, topic and network features by 7.8% on average F1-measure

Property-based interest propagation in ontology-based user model

We present an approach for propagation of user interests in ontology-based user models taking into account the properties declared for the concepts in the ontology. Starting from initial user feedback on an object, we calculate user interest in this particular object and its properties and further propagate user interest to other objects in the ontology, similar or related to the initial object. The similarity and relatedness of objects depends on the number of properties they have in common and their corresponding values. The approach we propose can support finer recommendation modalities, considering the user interest in the objects, as well as in singular properties of objects in the recommendation process. We tested our approach for interest propagation with a real adaptive application and obtained an improvement with respect to IS-A-propagation of interest values

Semantic similarity-driven decision support in the skeletal dysplasia domain

Biomedical ontologies have become a mainstream topic in medical research. They represent important sources of evolved knowledge that may be automatically integrated in decision support methods. Grounding clinical and radiographic findings in concepts defined by a biomedical ontology, e.g., the Human Phenotype Ontology, enables us to compute semantic similarity between them. In this paper, we focus on using such similarity measures to predict disorders on undiagnosed patient cases in the bone dysplasia domain. Different methods for computing the semantic similarity have been implemented. All methods have been evaluated based on their support in achieving a higher prediction accuracy. The outcome of this research enables us to understand the feasibility of developing decision support methods based on ontology-driven semantic similarity in the skeletal dysplasia domain

Comparisons of Relatedness Measures through a Word Sense Disambiguation Task

International audienceMichael Zock's work has focussed these last years on finding the appro- priate and most adequate word when writing or speaking. The semantic relatedness between words can play an important role in this context. We present here a novel approach to analyse the semantic relatedness between words based on the relevance of semantic relatedness measures on the global level of a word sense disambigua- tion task. We introduce two metrics : the best atteignable score and the correlation between global score and the F1 measure. We use them to analyse several classical local semantic similarity measures as well as measures built by our team

Robust Selection of Domain-Specific Semantic Similarity Measures from Uncertain Expertise

International audienceKnowledge-based semantic measures are cornerstone to exploit ontologies not only for exact inferences or retrieval processes, but also for data analyses and inexact searches. Abstract theoretical frameworks have recently been proposed in order to study the large diversity of measures available; they demonstrate that groups of measures are particular instantiations of general parameterized functions. In this paper, we study how such frameworks can be used to support the selection/design of measures. Based on (i) a theoretical framework unifying the measures, (ii) a software solution implementing this framework and (iii) a domain-specific benchmark, we define a semi-supervised learning technique to distinguish best measures for a concrete application. Next, considering uncertainty in both experts' judgments and measures' selection process, we extend this proposal for robust selection of semantic measures that best resists to these uncertainties. We illustrate our approach through a real use case in the biomedical domain