CT and clinical features for distinguishing endophytic clear cell renal cell carcinoma from urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSEWe aimed to characterize the clinical and multiphase computed tomography (CT) features of the distinguishing endophytic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ECCRCC) from endophytic renal urothelial carcinoma (ERUC).METHODSData from 44 patients (35 men and 9 women) with ECCRCC and 21 patients (17 men and 4 women) with ERUC were retrospectively assessed. The mean patient age was 55 years (48.25- 59.50 years) and 68 years (63.00-73.00 years), respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors for ECCRCC and to construct a predictive model that comprised clinical and CT characteristics for the differential diagnosis of ECCRCC and ERUC. Differential diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).RESULTSThe independent predictors of ECCRCC were heterogeneous enhancement (odds ratio [OR]=0.027, P=.005), hematuria (OR for gross hematuria=53.995, P=.003; OR for microscopic hematuria=31.126, P = .027), and an infiltrative growth pattern (OR=24.301, P = .022). The AUC of the predictive model was 0.938 (P < .001, sensitivity=84.10%, specificity=95.20%), which had a better diagnostic performance than heterogeneous enhancement (AUC=0.766, P=.001, sensitivity=81.82%, specificity=71.43%), hematuria (AUC=0.786, P < .001, sensitivity=81.82%, specificity=66.67%), and infiltrative growth pattern (AUC=0.748, P=.001, sensitivity=90.48%, specificity=59.09%).CONCLUSIONThe independent predictors, as well as the predictive model of CT and clinical characteristics, may assist in the differential diagnosis of ECCRCC and ERUC and provide useful information for clinical decision-making