Quantifying the accuracy and precision of a novel real-time 6 degree-of-freedom kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring (KIM) target tracking system.

Target rotation can considerably impact the delivered radiotherapy dose depending on the tumour shape. More accurate tumour pose during radiotherapy treatment can be acquired through tracking in 6 degrees-of-freedom (6 DoF) rather than in translation only. A novel real-time 6 DoF kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring (KIM) target tracking system has recently been developed. In this study, we experimentally evaluated the accuracy and precision of the 6 DoF KIM implementation. Real-time 6 DoF KIM motion measurements were compared against the ground truth motion retrospectively derived from kV/MV triangulation for a range of lung and prostate tumour motion trajectories as well as for various static poses using a phantom. The accuracy and precision of 6 DoF KIM were calculated as the mean and standard deviation of the differences between KIM and kV/MV triangulation for each DoF, respectively. We found that KIM is able to provide 6 DoF motion with sub-degree and sub-millimetre accuracy and precision for a range of realistic tumour motion

Commissioning and quality assurance for VMAT delivery systems: An efficient time-resolved system using real-time EPID imaging.

PURPOSE: An ideal commissioning and quality assurance (QA) program for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) delivery systems should assess the performance of each individual dynamic component as a function of gantry angle. Procedures within such a program should also be time-efficient, independent of the delivery system and be sensitive to all types of errors. The purpose of this work is to develop a system for automated time-resolved commissioning and QA of VMAT control systems which meets these criteria. METHODS: The procedures developed within this work rely solely on images obtained, using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) without the presence of a phantom. During the delivery of specially designed VMAT test plans, EPID frames were acquired at 9.5 Hz, using a frame grabber. The set of test plans was developed to individually assess the performance of the dose delivery and multileaf collimator (MLC) control systems under varying levels of delivery complexities. An in-house software tool was developed to automatically extract features from the EPID images and evaluate the following characteristics as a function of gantry angle: dose delivery accuracy, dose rate constancy, beam profile constancy, gantry speed constancy, dynamic MLC positioning accuracy, MLC speed and acceleration constancy, and synchronization between gantry angle, MLC positioning and dose rate. Machine log files were also acquired during each delivery and subsequently compared to information extracted from EPID image frames. RESULTS: The largest difference between measured and planned dose at any gantry angle was 0.8% which correlated with rapid changes in dose rate and gantry speed. For all other test plans, the dose delivered was within 0.25% of the planned dose for all gantry angles. Profile constancy was not found to vary with gantry angle for tests where gantry speed and dose rate were constant, however, for tests with varying dose rate and gantry speed, segments with lower dose rate and higher gantry speed exhibited less profile stability. MLC positional accuracy was not observed to be dependent on the degree of interdigitation. MLC speed was measured for each individual leaf and slower leaf speeds were shown to be compensated for by lower dose rates. The test procedures were found to be sensitive to 1 mm systematic MLC errors, 1 mm random MLC errors, 0.4 mm MLC gap errors and synchronization errors between the MLC, dose rate and gantry angle controls systems of 1°. In general, parameters measured by both EPID and log files agreed with the plan, however, a greater average departure from the plan was evidenced by the EPID measurements. CONCLUSION: QA test plans and analysis methods have been developed to assess the performance of each dynamic component of VMAT deliveries individually and as a function of gantry angle. This methodology relies solely on time-resolved EPID imaging without the presence of a phantom and has been shown to be sensitive to a range of delivery errors. The procedures developed in this work are both comprehensive and time-efficient and can be used for streamlined commissioning and QA of VMAT delivery systems

Development of EPID-based real-time dosimetry and geometry in radiation therapy

Masters Research - Master of Philosophy (MPhil)A real-time EPID-based dosimetric and geometric verification system is proposed. The system enables detection of gross treatment delivery errors prior to delivery of substantial radiation to the patient in IMRT treatment. A sophisticated physics-based model is utilized to generate an image stream of predicted cine EPID images as a reference dataset, and it then compares these to measured EPID images acquired during treatment. A new method that combines both geometrical and dosimetric comparison is used for synchronisation. In addition, jaw position and collimator angle are detected and verified in the beginning of treatment (approximately first 5 seconds). The system was simulated using MATLAB/SIMULINK. The synchronisation is shown to agree within 2 control points (~1% of the total dose delivered). In real-time dosimetry, two case studies were simulated: 1) Gross dose delivery error and 2) MLC leaf failure; the real-time dosimetry system was able to detect both of these errors in real-time (within 0.1 sec). In real-time geometry, jaw positioning and collimator angle were tested, and an average 0.5 mm error for jaw positioning and less than 0.5 degrees for collimator angle are shown in the tests. MLC leaf verification uses the advantageous result of synchronisation to monitor the MLC leaf motion behaviour during the treatment. A real-time verification system can prevent many of the major mistreatments that have recently occurred in radiation therapy. The system design is fast and can be easily applied in a clinical environment

Predicting Three-Dimensional Dose Distribution of Prostate Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using Deep Learning

Background: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning is a time-consuming process of radiation therapy. With a deep learning approach, 3D dose distribution can be predicted without the need for an actual dose calculation. This approach can accelerate the process by guiding and confirming the achievable dose distribution in order to reduce the replanning iterations while maintaining the plan quality. Methods: In this study, three dose distribution predictive models of VMAT for prostate cancer were developed, evaluated, and compared. Each model was designed with a different input data structure to train and test the model: (1) patient CT alone (PCT alone), (2) patient CT and generalized organ structure (PCTGOS), and (3) patient CT and specific organ structure (PCTSOS). The generative adversarial network (GAN) model was used as a core learning algorithm. The models were trained slice-by-slice using 46 VMAT plans for prostate cancer, and then used to predict and evaluate the dose distribution from 8 independent plans. Results: VMAT dose distribution was generated with a mean prediction time of approximately 3.5 s per patient, whereas the PCTSOS model was excluded due to a mean prediction time of approximately 17.5 s per patient. The highest average 3D gamma passing rate was 80.51 ± 5.94, while the lowest overall percentage difference of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters was 6.01 ± 5.44% for the prescription dose from the PCTGOS model. However, the PCTSOS model was the most reliable for the evaluation of multiple parameters. Conclusions: This dose prediction model could accelerate the iterative optimization process for the planning of VMAT treatment by guiding the planner with the desired dose distribution

A cine-EPID based method for jaw detection and quality assurance for tracking jaw in IMRT/VMAT treatments

A new tool with the potential to verify and track jaw position during delivery has been developed. The method should be suitable for independent quality assurance for jaw position during jaw tracking dynamic IMRT and VMAT treatments. The jaw detection and tracking algorithm developed consists of five main steps. Firstly, the image is enhanced by removing a normalised predicted EPID image (that does not include the collimator transmission) from each cine EPID image. Then, using a histogram clustering technique a global intensity threshold level was determined. This threshold level was used to classify each pixel of the image as either under the jaws or under the MLC. Additionally, the collimator angle was automatically detected and used to rotate the image to vertical direction. Finally, this rotation allows the jaw positions to be determined using vertical and horizontal projection profiles. Nine IMRT fields (with static jaws) and a single VMAT clinical field (with dynamic jaws) were tested by determining the root mean square difference between planned and detected jaw positions. The test results give a detection accuracy of ±1 mm RMS error for static jaw IMRT treatments and ±1.5 mm RMS error for the dynamic jaw VMAT treatment. This method is designed for quality assurance and verification in modern radiation therapy; to detect the position of static jaws or verify the position of tracking jaws in more complex treatments. This method uses only information extracted from EPID images and it is therefore independent from the linear accelerator

Gantry-angle resolved VMAT pretreatment verification using EPID image prediction

Purpose: Pretreatment verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dose delivery with electronic portal imaging device (EPID) uses images integrated over the entire delivery or over large subarcs. This work aims to develop a new method for gantry-angle-resolved verification of VMAT dose delivery using EPID. Methods: An EPID dose prediction model was used to calculate EPID images as a function of gantry angle for eight prostate patient deliveries. EPID image frames at 7.5 frames per second were acquired during delivery via a frame-grabber system. The gantry angle for each image was encoded in kV frames which were synchronized to the MV frames. Gamma analysis results as a function of gantry angle were assessed by integrating the frames over 2° subarcs with an angle-to-agreement tolerance of 0.5° about the measured image angle. Results: The model agreed with EPID images integrated over the entire delivery with average Gamma pass-rates at 2%, 2 mm of 99.7% (10% threshold). The accuracy of the kV derived gantry angle for each image was found to be 0.1° (1 SD) using a phantom test. For the gantry-resolved analysis all Gamma pass-rates were greater than 90% at 3%, 3 mm criteria (with only two exceptions), and more than 90% had a 95% pass-rate, with an average of 97.3%. The measured gantry angle lagged behind the predicted angle by a mean of 0.3° ± 0.3°, with a maximum lag of 1.3°. Conclusions: The method provides a comprehensive and highly efficient pretreatment verification of VMAT delivery using EPID. Dose delivery accuracy is assessed as a function of gantry angle to ensure accurate treatment

Development of EPID-based real time dose verification for dynamic IMRT

An electronic portal image device (EPID) has become a method of patient-specific IMRT dose verification for radiotherapy. Research studies have focused on pre and post-treatment verification, however, there are currently no interventional procedures using EPID dosimetry that measure the dose in real time as a mechanism to ensure that overdoses do not occur and underdoses are detected as soon as is practically possible. As a result, an EPID-based real time dose verification system for dynamic IMRT was developed and was implemented with MATLAB/Simulink. The EPID image acquisition was set to continuous acquisition mode at 1.4 images per second. The system defined the time constraint gap, or execution gap at the image acquisition time, so that every calculation must be completed before the next image capture is completed. In addition, the γ-evaluation method was used for dose comparison, with two types of comparison processes; individual image and cumulative dose comparison monitored. The outputs of the system are the γ-map, the percent of γ<1, and mean-γ versus time, all in real time. Two strategies were used to test the system, including an error detection test and a clinical data test. The system can monitor the actual dose delivery compared with the treatment plan data or previous treatment dose delivery that means a radiation therapist is able to switch off the machine when the error is detected