Development and Evaluation of a Real-World Outcomes-Based Tool to Support Informed Clinical Decision Making in the Palliative Treatment of Patients With Metastatic NSCLC

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a tool for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer and their thoracic oncologists (TOs) that provides insight into real-world effectiveness of systemic treatments to support informed clinical decision making in the palliative setting. METHODS: A participatory design approach was used to acquire insights from patients and TOs into preferences regarding the content and design of the web-based tool. Implementation was investigated by means of an adoption and usage rate. The appreciation of the tool was evaluated through a telephone survey with patients and a questionnaire for TOs. RESULTS: From clinical data of 2,989 patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer diagnosed in one of the Santeon hospitals, an interface was developed to show treatments plus both real-world outcomes and clinical trial results after selecting patient characteristics (patients like me). This prototype of the tool was finalized after discussion in a focus group with four TOs and semi-structured interviews with six patients. The tool was implemented and used by TOs in three of six Santeon hospitals (50% adoption rate). The tool was used in 48 patients (29% usage rate), of which 17 participated in the telephone survey. Ten TOs responded to the questionnaire. The responses varied from positive reactions on the clear overview of treatment outcomes to statements that the tool rarely changed treatment decisions. Overall, the majority of patients and TOs scored the tool as of added value (71% and 83%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our real-world data tool in metastatic lung cancer was appreciated in clinical practice by both patients and TOs. However, the efficacy of the implementation can be improved

Phase II Multicenter Clinical Trial of Pulmonary Metastasectomy and Isolated Lung Perfusion with Melphalan in Patients with Resectable Lung Metastases

IntroductionThe 5-year overall survival rate of patients undergoing complete surgical resection of pulmonary metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) and sarcoma remains low (20–50%). Local recurrence rate is high (48–66%). Isolated lung perfusion (ILuP) allows the delivery of high-dose locoregional chemotherapy with minimal systemic leakage to improve local control.MethodsFrom 2006 to 2011, 50 patients, 28 male, median age 57 years (15–76), with PM from CRC (n = 30) or sarcoma (n = 20) were included in a phase II clinical trial conducted in four cardiothoracic surgical centers. In total, 62 ILuP procedures were performed, 12 bilaterally, with 45 mg of melphalan at 37°C, followed by resection of all palpable PM. Survival was calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsOperative mortality was 0%, and 90-day morbidity was mainly respiratory (grade 3: 42%, grade 4: 2%). After a median follow-up of 24 months (3–63 mo), 18 patients died, two without recurrence. Thirty patients had recurrent disease. Median time to local pulmonary progression was not reached. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 57% ± 9% and 36% ± 8%, respectively. Lung function data showed a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and diffusing capacity of the alveolocapillary membrane of 21.6% and 25.8% after 1 month, and 10.4% and 11.3% after 12 months, compared with preoperative values.ConclusionCompared with historical series of PM resection without ILuP, favorable results are obtained in terms of local control without long-term adverse effects. These data support the further investigation of ILuP as additional treatment in patients with resectable PM from CRC or sarcoma

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer

Objective: Clinical outcome data on patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED SCLC) treated in routine practice is limited. The aim of this retrospective study is to present data on treatment patterns and survival in an unselected patient population with ED SCLC. Methods: All patients diagnosed with ED SCLC between 2008 and 2014 in six Dutch large teaching hospitals (Santeon network) were included. We collected data on patient characteristics, systemic treatments, overall survival (OS), dose reductions (<80% of initial dose) and early discontinuation (<4 cycles). Results: From 792 diagnosed patients, 568 (72%) started with first-line treatment. Of these patients, 41% received second-line treatment. Only 68 patients received third-line treatment. For all treated patients, the mean age was 66 years. The majority (72%) had a performance status (ECOG) of 0 or 1 at diagnosis. Median OS of treated patients was 7.4 months. Of all patients with first-line treatment, 26% received <4 cycles and dose reductions were observed in 29%. Conclusion: After first-line systemic treatment in ED SCLC the fraction of patients receiving subsequent lines of treatment is rapidly decreasing. This information is necessary as background for evaluation of the added value of future drugs under study for ED SCLC

Development and evaluation of a real-world outcomes-based tool to support informed clinical decision making in the palliative treatment of patients with metastatic nsclc

PURPOSE To develop and evaluate a tool for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer and their thoracic oncologists (TOs) that provides insight into real-world effectiveness of systemic treatments to support informed clinical decision making in the palliative setting. METHODS A participatory design approach was used to acquire insights from patients and TOs into preferences regarding the content and design of the web-based tool. Implementation was investigated by means of an adoption and usage rate. The appreciation of the tool was evaluated through a telephone survey with patients and a questionnaire for TOs. RESULTS From clinical data of 2,989 patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer diagnosed in one of the Santeon hospitals, an interface was developed to show treatments plus both real-world outcomes and clinical trial results after selecting patient characteristics (patients like me). This prototype of the tool was finalized after discussion in a focus group with four TOs and semi-structured interviews with six patients. The tool was implemented and used by TOs in three of six Santeon hospitals (50% adoption rate). The tool was used in 48 patients (29% usage rate), of which 17 participated in the telephone survey. Ten TOs responded to the questionnaire. The responses varied from positive reactions on the clear overview of treatment outcomes to statements that the tool rarely changed treatment decisions. Overall, the majority of patients and TOs scored the tool as of added value (71% and 83%, respectively). CONCLUSION Our real-world data tool in metastatic lung cancer was appreciated in clinical practice by both patients and TOs. However, the efficacy of the implementation can be improved