Aluminium effects on microtubule organization in dividing root-tip cells of Triticum turgidum. I. Mitotic cells

The effects of aluminium (Al) on dividing root-tip cells of Triticum turgidum were investigated with tubulin immunolabelling and electron microscopy. Aluminium affects the mechanisms controlling the organization of microtubule (MT) cytoskeleton, as well as tubulin polymerization, and induces the following aberrations in mitotic cells. (1) It delays the MT disassembly during mitosis, resulting in the persistence of preprophase MT bands in the late prophase cells, the presence of prophase spindles in prometaphase cells, and a disturbance in the shortening of kinetochore MT bundles in anaphase cells. (2) It interferes with the self-organization process of MTs into bipolar systems, inhibiting the formation of prophase and metaphase spindles. (3) Aluminium induces the formation of atypical MT arrays, which in the immunofluorescent specimens appear as ring-like tubulin aggregations in the cortical cytoplasm of the preprophase/prophase cells and as endoplasmic tubulin bundles in prophase and metaphase/anaphase cells; abnormal preprophase MT bands are assembled, consisting of atypical cortical and endoplasmic MT bundles, the latter clearly lining the nuclear envelope on the preprophase MT band plane. (4) It disorders the chromosome movements carried out by the mitotic spindle. In addition, after prolonged Al treatments chromatin condensation is inhibited. The outcome is greatly disturbed organization and function of the mitotic appartus, as well as inhibition of cells from entering mitosis. This study shows that the MT cytoskeleton is a target site of Al toxicity in mitotic root-tip cells of T. turgidum. The possible mechanisms by which Al exerts its toxicity on MT organization and function are discussed

Aluminium causes variable responses in actin filament cytoskeleton of the root tip cells of Triticum turgidum

The effects of aluminium on the actin filament (AF) cytoskeleton of Triticum turgidum meristematic root tip cells were examined. In short treatments (up to 2 h) with 50-1000 μM AlCl3·6H2O, interphase cells displayed numerous AFs arrayed in thick bundles that lined the plasmalemma and traversed the endoplasm in different directions. Measurements using digital image analysis and assessment of the overall AF fluorescence revealed that, in short treatments, the affected cells possessed 25-30% more AFs than the untreated ones. The thick AF bundles were not formed in the Al-treated cells in the presence of the myosin inhibitors 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM) and 1-(5-iodonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl)-1H-hexahydro-1,4-diazepine (ML-7), a fact suggesting that myosins are involved in AF bundling. In longer Al treatments, the AF bundles were disorganised, forming granular actin accumulations, a process that was completed after 4 h of treatment. In the Al-treated cells, increased amounts of callose were uniformly deposited along the whole surface of the cell walls. In contrast, callose formed local deposits in the Al-treated cells in the presence of cytochalasin B, BDM, or ML-7. These results favour the hypothesis that the actomyosin system in the Al-treated cells, among other roles, participates in the mechanism controlling callose deposition. © Springer-Verlag 2005

Evaluation of toxicity and genotoxic effects of spinosad and deltamethrin in Drosophila melanogaster and Bactrocera oleae

BACKGROUND: The insecticides spinosad and deltamethrin are being increasingly used in pest management programmes. In order to assess further their toxic effects to target and non-target insect species, an evaluation was made of their insecticidal profile on Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) and Drosophila melanogaster (Meig.). Moreover, possible genotoxic effects of the two pesticides were investigated using the somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) in D. melanogaster. RESULTS: Both insecticides were highly effective against B. oleae, exhibiting similar LC(50) values. Moreover, they were found to be more effective against Bactrocera than against Drosophila adults. However, spinosad was significantly more toxic than deltamethrin to D. melanogaster. The results showed a lack of genotoxic activity of both insecticides under the in vivo experimental procedure employed, at least at applied doses. CONCLUSION: The present study provides information for lethal and sublethal effects of spinosad and deltamethrin against a target and a non-target species. Both insecticides can exert high toxicity to B. oleae when adults are exposed even to very low doses for long periods of time. The results contribute to the database on the genotoxic potential of spinosad and deltamethrin, suggesting a safety profile for both insecticides. (C) 2011 Society of Chemical Industr