Resistance Mechanisms towards CD38−Directed Antibody Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Antibodies targeting CD38 are rapidly changing the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma (MM). CD38−directed antibodies have several mechanisms of action. Fc−dependent immune effector mechanisms include complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody−dependent cell−mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) and apoptosis. In addition, direct effects and immunomodulatory effects contribute to the efficacy of CD38−directed antibodies. Daratumumab, the first−in−class anti−CD38 monoclonal antibody, is now part of standard treatment regimens of both newly diagnosed as well as relapsed/refractory MM patients. The FDA has recently approved isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM patients after at least two prior therapies. Further, the other CD38−targeting antibodies (i.e., MOR202 and TAK-079) are increasingly used in clinical trials. The shift to front-line treatment of daratumumab will lead to an increase in patients refractory to CD38 antibody therapy already after first−line treatment. Therefore, it is important to gain insight into the mechanisms of resistance to CD38−targeting antibodies in MM, and to develop strategies to overcome this resistance. In the current review, we will briefly describe the most important clinical data and mechanisms of action and will focus in depth on the current knowledge on mechanisms of resistance to CD38-targeting antibodies and potential strategies to overcome this

Immunotherapy in myeloma: how far have we come?

The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved substantially over the past decades, leading to a significantly improved outcome of MM patients. The introduction of high-dose therapy, especially, and autologous stem cell transplantation, as well as the development of new drugs, such as immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors have contributed to the improvement in survival. However, eventually most MM patients relapse, which indicates that there is a need for new agents and novel treatment strategies. Importantly, the long-term survival in a subset of MM patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation illustrates the potential of immunotherapy in MM, but allogeneic stem cell transplantation is also associated with a high rate of treatment-related mortality. Recently, a better insight into several immune-evasion mechanisms, which contribute to tumor progression, has resulted in the development of active and well-tolerated novel forms of immunotherapy. These immunotherapeutic agents can be used as monotherapy, or, even more successfully, in combination with other established anti-MM agents to further improve depth and duration of response by preventing the outgrowth of resistant clones. This review will discuss the mechanisms used by MM cells to evade the immune system, and also provide an overview of currently approved immunotherapeutic drugs, such as IMiDs (e.g. lenalidomide and pomalidomide) and monoclonal antibodies that target cell surface antigens present on the MM cell (e.g. elotuzumab and daratumumab), as well as novel immunotherapies (e.g. chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, bispecific antibodies and checkpoint inhibitors) currently in clinical development in MM

Outcome of allogeneic transplantation in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up in a single institution

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has the potential to induce long-term remission in multiple myeloma (MM), but the role of allo-SCT in MM is controversial due to the high rate of treatment-related mortality (TRM). However, although proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs have improved the outcome of MM patients, high-risk patients still have a very poor prognosis. This indicates the need for new treatment strategies and identification of patients who might benefit from allo-SCT. We therefore analyzed the outcome of one hundred and forty-seven MM patients who received an allo-SCT at our institution (58 in first line, 89 in relapsed/refractory setting) after a median follow up of 88.8 months. For the first line setting, median PFS and OS were remarkably good, with a CR rate of 48.3%, median PFS of 30.2 months and 10-year OS of 51%. We found no difference in outcome for patients with high-risk metaphase cytogenetics or FISH del(13q14), but efficacy in current standard high-risk patients could not be determined. The outcome in the relapsed/refractory setting was poor, especially in the subgroup of patients relapsing within 18 months after auto-SCT. Therefore, if applied at all in these patients, improvement of allo-SCT is needed, focusing on reduction of TRM and more effective immunotherapy

Outcome of allogeneic transplantation in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma : long-term follow-up in a single institution

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has the potential to induce long-term remission in multiple myeloma (MM), but the role of allo-SCT in MM is controversial due to the high rate of treatment-related mortality (TRM). However, although proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs have improved the outcome of MM patients, high-risk patients still have a very poor prognosis. This indicates the need for new treatment strategies and identification of patients who might benefit from allo-SCT. We therefore analyzed the outcome of one hundred and forty-seven MM patients who received an allo-SCT at our institution (58 in first line, 89 in relapsed/refractory setting) after a median follow up of 88.8 months. For the first line setting, median PFS and OS were remarkably good, with a CR rate of 48.3%, median PFS of 30.2 months and 10-year OS of 51%. We found no difference in outcome for patients with high-risk metaphase cytogenetics or FISH del(13q14), but efficacy in current standard high-risk patients could not be determined. The outcome in the relapsed/refractory setting was poor, especially in the subgroup of patients relapsing within 18 months after auto-SCT. Therefore, if applied at all in these patients, improvement of allo-SCT is needed, focusing on reduction of TRM and more effective immunotherapy.

Phase 1/2 study of lenalidomide combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisone in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma

Key Points REP is an active combination in MM patients refractory to lenalidomide. REP is an all-oral and generally well-tolerated regimen.</jats:p

Lenalidomide combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisone modulates Ikaros and Aiolos in lymphocytes, resulting in immunostimulatory effects in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma patients

We recently showed that the outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated in the REPEAT study (evaluation of lenalidomide combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisone (REP) in lenalidomide-refractory MM) was markedly better than what has been described with cyclophosphamide-prednisone alone. The outcome with REP was not associated with plasma cell Cereblon expression levels, suggesting that the effect of REP treatment may involve mechanisms independent of plasma cell Cereblon-mediated direct anti-tumor activity. We therefore hypothesized that immunomodulatory effects contribute to the anti-MM activity of REP treatment, rather than plasma cell Cereblon-mediated effects. Consequently, we now characterized the effect of REP treatment on immune cell subsets in peripheral blood samples collected on day 1 and 14 of cycle 1, as well as on day 1 of cycle 2. We observed a significant mid-cycle decrease in the Cereblon substrate proteins Ikaros and Aiolos in diverse lymphocyte subsets, which was paralleled by an increase in T-cell activation. These effects were restored to baseline at day one of the second cycle, one week after lenalidomide interruption. In vitro, lenalidomide enhanced peripheral blood mononuclear cell-mediated killing of both lenalidomide-sensitive and lenalidomide-resistant MM cells in a co-culture system. These results indicate that the Cereblon-mediated immunomodulatory properties of lenalidomide are maintained in lenalidomide-refractory MM patients and may contribute to immune-mediated killing of MM cells. Therefore, combining lenalidomide with other drugs can have potent effects through immunomodulation, even in patients considered to be lenalidomide-refractory

Lenalidomide combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisone modulates Ikaros and Aiolos in lymphocytes, resulting in immunostimulatory effects in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma patients

We recently showed that the outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated in the REPEAT study (evaluation of lenalidomide combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisone (REP) in lenalidomide-refractory MM) was markedly better than what has been described with cyclophosphamide-prednisone alone. The outcome with REP was not associated with plasma cell Cereblon expression levels, suggesting that the effect of REP treatment may involve mechanisms independent of plasma cell Cereblon-mediated direct anti-tumor activity. We therefore hypothesized that immunomodulatory effects contribute to the anti-MM activity of REP treatment, rather than plasma cell Cereblon-mediated effects. Consequently, we now characterized the effect of REP treatment on immune cell subsets in peripheral blood samples collected on day 1 and 14 of cycle 1, as well as on day 1 of cycle 2. We observed a significant mid-cycle decrease in the Cereblon substrate proteins Ikaros and Aiolos in diverse lymphocyte subsets, which was paralleled by an increase in T-cell activation. These effects were restored to baseline at day one of the second cycle, one week after lenalidomide interruption. In vitro, lenalidomide enhanced peripheral blood mononuclear cell-mediated killing of both lenalidomide-sensitive and lenalidomide-resistant MM cells in a co-culture system. These results indicate that the Cereblon-mediated immunomodulatory properties of lenalidomide are maintained in lenalidomide-refractory MM patients and may contribute to immune-mediated killing of MM cells. Therefore, combining lenalidomide with other drugs can have potent effects through immunomodulation, even in patients considered to be lenalidomide-refractory