Randomised Clinical Trial of Supervised Exercise Therapy vs. Endovascular Revascularisation for Intermittent Claudication Caused by Iliac Artery Obstruction:The SUPER study

OBJECTIVE: International guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as primary treatment for all patients with intermittent claudication (IC), yet primary endovascular revascularisation (ER) might be more effective in patients with iliac artery obstruction. METHODS: This was a multicentre RCT including patients with IC caused by iliac artery stenosis or occlusion (NCT01385774). Patients were allocated randomly to SET or ER stratified for maximum walking distance (MWD) and concomitant SFA disease. Primary endpoints were MWD on a treadmill (3.2 km/h, 10% incline) and disease specific quality of life (VascuQol) after one year. Additional interventions during a mean follow up of 5.5 years were recorded. RESULTS: Between November 2010 and May 2015, 114 patients were allocated to SET, and 126 to ER. The trial was terminated prematurely after 240 patients were included. Compliance with SET was 57/114 (50%) after six months. Ten patients allocated to ER (8%) did not receive this intervention. One year follow up was complete for 90/114 (79%) SET patients and for 104/126 (83%) ER patients. The mean MWD improved from 187 to 561 m in SET patients and from 196 to 574 m in ER patients (p = .69). VascuQol sumscore improved from 4.24 to 5.58 in SET patients, and from 4.28 to 5.88 in ER patients (p = .048). Some 33/114 (29%) SET patients had an ER within one year, and 2/114 (2%) surgical revascularisation (SR). Some 10/126 (8%) ER patients had additional ER within one year and 10/126 (8%) SR. After a mean of 5.5 years, 49% of SET patients and 27% of ER patients underwent an additional intervention for IC. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the many limitations of the SUPER study, both a strategy of primary SET and primary ER improve MWD on a treadmill and disease specific Qol of patients with IC caused by an iliac artery obstruction. It seems reasonable to start with SET in these patients and accept a 30% failure rate, which, of course, must be discussed with the patient. Patients continue to have interventions beyond one year

The relationship of walking distances estimated by the patient, on the corridor and on a treadmill, and the Walking Impairment Questionnaire in intermittent claudication

Physicians and patients consider the limited walking distance and perceived disability when they make decisions regarding (invasive) treatment of intermittent claudication (IC). We investigated the relationship between walking distances estimated by the patient, on the corridor and on a treadmill, and the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) in patients with IC due to peripheral arterial disease. This was a single-center, prospective observational cohort study at a vascular laboratory in a university hospital in the Netherlands. The study consisted of 60 patients (41 male) with a median age of 64 years (range, 44-86 years) with IC and a walking distance ≤ 250 m on a standardized treadmill test. Main outcome measures were differences and Spearman rank correlations between pain-free walking distance, maximum walking distance (MWD) estimated by the patient, on the corridor and on a standardized treadmill test, and their correlation with the WIQ. The median patients' estimated, corridor, and treadmill MWD were 200, 200, and 123, respectively (P < .05). Although the median patients' estimated and corridor MWD were not significantly different, there was a difference on an individual basis. The correlation between the patients' estimated and corridor MWD was moderate (r = 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.75). The correlation between patients' estimated and treadmill MWD was weak (r = 0.39; 95%, CI 0.15-0.58). Respective correlations for the pain-free walking distance were comparable. The patients' estimated MWD was moderately correlated with WIQ total score (r = 0.63; 95%, CI 0.45-0.76) and strongly correlated with WIQ distance score (r = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.88). The correlation between the corridor MWD and WIQ distance score was moderate (r = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.74). Patients' estimated walking distances and on a treadmill do not reflect walking distances in daily life. Instruments that take into account the perceived walking impairment, such as the WIQ, may help to better guide and evaluate treatment decision