anosmia in COVID-19. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 through the nasoliary epithelium and a possible spreading way to the central nervous system—a purpose to study

Italy is currently one of the countries most affected by the global emergency of COVID-19, a lethal disease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).1 A lot of emergency centers from China,2 United Kingdom, and Italy,3 including our Department of Policlinic Umberto I of Rome, reported a significant number of COVID-19 patients presenting anosmia and ageusia as onset symptoms,4 and it is reported that anosmia appear at an early stage of the disease

Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 37: a decade of persistence and concealed evolution

The first reports of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in our hospital date back to 2006. In that period, few ertapenem-resistant but meropenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates belonging to sequence type (ST) 37 were retrieved from clinical samples. These strains produced the CTX-M-15 extended spectrum β-lactamase, OmpK35 was depleted due to a nonsense mutation, and a novel OmpK36 variant was identified. Yet, starting from 2010, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing ST512 isolates started prevailing and ST37 vanished from sight. Since 2018 the clinical use of the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) has been introduced in clinical practice for the treatment of bacteria producing serine-β-lactamases, but KPC-producing, CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae are emerging. In 2021, four CZA-resistant ST37 isolates producing KPC variants were isolated from the same number of patients. blaKPC gene cloning in Escherichia coli was used to define the role of those KPC variants on CZA resistance, and whole genome sequencing was performed on these isolates and on three ST37 historical isolates from 2011. CZA resistance was due to mutations in the blaKPC genes carried on related pKpQIL-type plasmids, and three variants of the KPC enzyme have been identified in the four ST37 strains. The four ST37 isolates were closely related to each other and to the historical isolates, suggesting that ST37 survived without notice in our hospital for 10 years, waiting to re-emerge as a CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae clone. The ancestor of these contemporary isolates derives from ST37 wild-type porin strains, with no other mutations in chromosomal genes involved in conferring antibiotic resistance (parC, gyrA, ramR, mgrB, pmrB)

Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in COVID-19 patients: a two-month retrospective analysis in an Italian hospital

Italy has experienced one of the harshest and earliest COVID-19 epidemics, with the number of patients infected that followed, from the end of February up to the end of March, an exponential trend [1]. Between the 6 March and the 2 May, 394 patients were confirmed positive for SARS-CoV-2 at the University Hospital of Rome Policlinico Umberto I (PUI) [2]. At the PUI, 5 COVID-19 devoted wards were organized, including two brand new ICUs, counting 32 dedicated to COVID-19 patients: the first was the old general ICU converted into a dedicated COVID-19 ICU, while the second was created in the spaces of four operating rooms (new ICU). In the period of this study, a total of 80 COVID-19-affected patients were hospitalized in the two ICUs at PUI. Among them, 65 patients were screened for carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) colonization (Brilliance™ CRE medium plates, Oxoid LTD, Basingstoke, UK): 41 out of 47 SARS-CoV-2 patients hospitalised in the old ICU and 24 out of 33 in the new one. Carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae were detected in 14/41 patients (34%) only in the old ICU. No CPE were detected from rectal swabs tested in patients hospitalized in the new ICU. In the same period, 11 CPEs were identified from the 39 rectal swabs out of 48 SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (28%) hospitalized in the non-COVID-ICU of the same hospital. Seven COVID-19 patients developed CPE co-infection (5 bronchoalveolar lavages and 2 blood cultures tested positives for carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae), while in the non-COVID-19 ICU 7 bloodstream infections (BSIs) also occurred (Table 1). Symptomatic patients were successfully treated with ceftazidime-avibactam

Multiplicity of blaKPC genes and pKpQIL plasmid plasticity in the development of ceftazidime-avibactam and Meropenem coresistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 307

In 2021, Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 307 (ST307) strains causing pulmonary and bloodstream infections identified in a hospital in Rome, Italy, reached high levels of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA). One of these strains reached high levels of resistance to both CZA and carbapenems and carried two copies of bla(KPC-3) and one copy of bla(KPC-31) located on plasmid pKpQIL. The genomes and plasmids of CZA-resistant ST307 strains were analyzed to identify the molecular mechanisms leading to the evolution of resistance and compared with ST307 genomes at local and global levels. A complex pattern of multiple plasmids in rearranged configurations, coresident within the CZA-carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strain, was observed. Characterization of these plasmids revealed recombination and segregation events explaining why K. pneumoniae isolates from the same patient had different antibiotic resistance profiles. This study illustrates the intense genetic plasticity occurring in ST307, one of the most worldwide-diffused K. pneumoniae high-risk clones.In 2021, Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 307 (ST307) strains causing pulmonary and bloodstream infections identified in a hospital in Rome, Italy, reached high levels of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA). One of these strains reached high levels of resistance to both CZA and carbapenems and carried two copies of bla(KPC-3) and one copy of bla(KPC-31) located on plasmid pKpQIL

The role of teicoplanin in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a retrospective study in critically ill COVID-19 patients (Tei-COVID Study)

Teicoplanin has a potential antiviral activity expressed against SARS-CoV-2 and was suggested as a complementary option to treat COVID-19 patients. In this multicentric, retrospective, observational research the aim was to evaluate the impact of teicoplanin on the course of COVID-19 in critically ill patients

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in a department of pediatrics: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: We describe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal carriage at admission in patients admitted to a Department of Pediatrics. METHODS: All patients received a nasal swab at admission. A questionnaire was administered and molecular genetics analyses were performed on all identified MRSA isolates. RESULTS: We enrolled 785 patients, affected with both acute and chronic diseases. MRSA nasal colonization prevalence was 1.15% (CI: 0.5607%-2.093%). Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) nasal colonization prevalence at admission was 19.75% (CI 17.07%-22.64%). Only one MRSA isolate carried the SCCmec V variant; all other isolates carried the SCCmecIV variant. Five out of 9 MRSA-colonized patients had an underlying condition. Antibiotic therapy in the previous 6 months was a protective factor for both MRSA (OR 0,66; 95% CI: 0,46-0,96) and MSSA (OR 0,65; 95% CI: 0,45-0,97) colonization. A tendency to statistical significance was seen in the association between hospitalization in the 6 months prior to admission and MRSA colonization at admission (OR 4,92; 95% CI: 0,97-24,83). No patient was diagnosed with an S. aureus infection during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of our MRSA colonizing isolates have community origins. Nevertheless, most MRSA-colonized patients had been hospitalized previously, suggesting that strains that circulate in the community also circulate in hospital settings. Further studies should elucidate the role of children with frequent contact with health care institutions in the circulation of antibiotic resistant strains between the hospital and the community

Impact of Initial Antifungal Therapy on the Outcome of Patients With Candidemia and Septic Shock Admitted to Medical Wards: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis

Echinocandins are recommended as firstline therapy in patients with candidemia. However, there is debate on their efficacy in survival outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the choice of initial antifungal therapy improves mortality in patients with candidemia in relation to the presence of septic shock

Impact of Initial Antifungal Therapy on the Outcome of Patients With Candidemia and Septic Shock Admitted to Medical Wards: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis

13noBACKGROUND: Echinocandins are recommended as firstline therapy in patients with candidemia. However, there is debate on their efficacy in survival outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the choice of initial antifungal therapy improves mortality in patients with candidemia in relation to the presence of septic shock. METHODS: Patients with candidemia hospitalized in internal medicine wards of 5 tertiary care centers were included in the study (December 2012-December 2014). Patient characteristics, therapeutic interventions, and outcome were reviewed. Propensity score (PS) was used as a covariate of the multivariate analysis to perform a stratified analysis according to PS quartiles and to match patients receiving "echinocandins" or "azoles." RESULTS: Overall, 439 patients with candidemia were included in the study. A total of 172 (39.2%) patients had septic shock. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with septic shock (45.3%) compared with those without septic shock (31.5%; P = .003). Among patients with septic shock, the use of echinocandins in the first 48 hours, compared with azoles, did not affect 30-day mortality in the PS-adjusted Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-1.59; P = .48), the PS-stratified analysis, or the logistic regression model in matched cohorts (adjusted HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.51-1.63; P = .77). CONCLUSIONS: Echinocandin therapy seems not to improve the outcome of non-intensive care unit patients with septic shock due to candidemia. These findings support the urgent need of further studies in this patient population.openopenFalcone, Marco; Giusy, Tiseo; Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Belen; Giammarco, Raponi; Paolo, Carfagna; Chiara, Rosin; Roberto, Luzzati; Diego, Delle Rose; Massimo, Andreoni; Alessio, Farcomeni; Mario, Venditti; Rodríguez-Baño, Jesus; Menichetti, FrancescoMarco, Falcone; Tiseo, Giusy; Belen, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Raponi, Giammarco; Carfagna, Paolo; Rosin, Chiara; Luzzati, Roberto; Delle Rose, Diego; Andreoni, Massimo; Farcomeni, Alessio; Venditti, Mario; Jesus, Rodríguez-Baño; Francesco, Menichett

Sars-Cov2 Not Detected in a Pediatric Population With Acute Respiratory Infection in Primary Care in Central and Southern Italy From November 2019 to Early March 2020

Background: In December 2019, a novel coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 started circulating in China and this led to a major epidemic in Northern Italy between February and May 2020. Young children (aged <5 years) seem to be less affected by this coronavirus disease (COVID-19) compared to adults, although there is very little information on the circulation of this new virus among children in Italy. We retrospectively tested nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 in samples collected in young children between November, 2019 and March, 2020 in the context of the RSV ComNet study. Methods: Two networks of primary care pediatricians in Lazio (Central Italy) and Puglia (Southern Italy) collected nasopharyngeal swabs from children, aged <5 years, presenting with symptoms for an acute respiratory infection (ARI). The RSV ComNet study is a multicenter study implemented to estimate the burden of RSV in young children (aged <5 years) in the community. Swabs were sent to a central reference laboratory and tested for 14 respiratory viruses through RT-PCR. All collected samples were retrospectively tested for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR (Istituto Superiore di Sanità protocol). Results: A total of 293 children with ARI were identified in the two participating networks. The highest number of cases were recruited in weeks 51/2019 and 3/2020. The majority of patients (57%) came from the Lazio region. All of the 293 samples tested negative for SARS-Cov2. Rhinovirus was the most frequently detected virus (44%), followed by RSV (41%) and influenza viruses (14%). Conclusions: Our study shows that in Lazio (a region of intermediate SARS-COV-2 incidence) and Puglia (a region of low incidence), the SARS-Cov2 virus did not circulate in a sample of ARI pediatric cases consulting primary care pediatricians between November 2019 and March 2020