Mavacamten Treatment for Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Interim Results From the MAVA-LTE Study, EXPLORER-LTE Cohort.

This study was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. Bristol Myers Squibb’s policy on data sharing is available online at https://www.bms.com/researchers-and-partners/clinicaltrials-and-research/disclosure-commitment.html. Dr Rader has received consulting fees from Medtronic, Bristol Myers Squibb, and ReCor Medical. Dr Ore˛ziak has received personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Saberi has received personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Fermin has received consulting fees from Alnylam, Eidos Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. Dr Wheeler has received personal fees and research support from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Garcia-Pavia has received consulting and speaking fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, and Cytokinetics and speaking fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Cytokinetics. Dr Zwas has received personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Masri has received grants from Akcea, Pfizer, and Ultromics and consulting fees from Alnylam, Cytokinetics, Eidos Therapeutics, Ionis, and Pfizer. Dr Owens has received consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, and Pfizer. Dr Hegde serves on the faculty of the Cardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and her institution has received payments for her consulting work from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Seidler has received consulting fees or honoraria for lectures from Bristol Myers Squibb and Cytokinetics. Dr Balaratnam and Dr Sehnert are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb and own stock of Bristol Myers Squibb. Shawna Fox is an employee of IQVIA, a partner providing statistics services to Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Olivotto has received grants from Amicus, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Genzyme, and Menarini International and consulting fees from Amicus, Cytokinetics, Genzyme, MS Pharma, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, and Tenaya Therapeutics.BACKGROUND Data assessing the long-term safety and efficacy of mavacamten treatment for symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are needed. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to evaluate interim results from the EXPLORER-Long Term Extension (LTE) cohort of MAVA-LTE (A Long-Term Safety Extension Study of Mavacamten in Adults Who Have Completed EXPLORER-HCM; NCT03723655). METHODS After mavacamten or placebo withdrawal at the end of the parent EXPLORER-HCM (Clinical Study to Evaluate Mavacamten [MYK-461] in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy; NCT03470545), patients could enroll in MAVA-LTE. Patients received mavacamten 5 mg once daily; adjustments were made based on site-read echocardiograms. RESULTS Between April 9, 2019, and March 5, 2021, 231 of 244 eligible patients (94.7%) enrolled in MAVA-LTE (mean age: 60 years; 39% female). At data cutoff (August 31, 2021) 217 (93.9%) remained on treatment (median time in study: 62.3 weeks; range: 0.3-123.9 weeks). At 48 weeks, patients showed improvements in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients (mean change ± SD from baseline: resting: -35.6 ± 32.6 mm Hg; Valsalva: -45.3 ± 35.9 mm Hg), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (median: -480 ng/L; Q1-Q3: -1,104 to -179 ng/L), and NYHA functional class (67.5% improved by ≥1 class). LVOT gradients and NT-proBNP reductions were sustained through 84 weeks in patients who reached this timepoint. Over 315 patient-years of exposure, 8 patients experienced an adverse event of cardiac failure, and 21 patients had an adverse event of atrial fibrillation, including 11 with no prior history of atrial fibrillation. Twelve patients (5.2%) developed transient reductions in site-read echocardiogram left ventricular ejection fraction of <50%, resulting in temporary treatment interruption; all recovered. Ten patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Mavacamten treatment showed clinically important and durable improvements in LVOT gradients, NT-proBNP levels, and NYHA functional class, consistent with EXPLORER-HCM. Mavacamten treatment was well tolerated over a median 62-week follow-up.S

Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2015: advancing efficient methodologies through community partnerships and team science

It is well documented that the majority of adults, children and families in need of evidence-based behavioral health interventionsi do not receive them [1, 2] and that few robust empirically supported methods for implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) exist. The Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) represents a burgeoning effort to advance the innovation and rigor of implementation research and is uniquely focused on bringing together researchers and stakeholders committed to evaluating the implementation of complex evidence-based behavioral health interventions. Through its diverse activities and membership, SIRC aims to foster the promise of implementation research to better serve the behavioral health needs of the population by identifying rigorous, relevant, and efficient strategies that successfully transfer scientific evidence to clinical knowledge for use in real world settings [3]. SIRC began as a National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-funded conference series in 2010 (previously titled the “Seattle Implementation Research Conference”; $150,000 USD for 3 conferences in 2011, 2013, and 2015) with the recognition that there were multiple researchers and stakeholdersi working in parallel on innovative implementation science projects in behavioral health, but that formal channels for communicating and collaborating with one another were relatively unavailable. There was a significant need for a forum within which implementation researchers and stakeholders could learn from one another, refine approaches to science and practice, and develop an implementation research agenda using common measures, methods, and research principles to improve both the frequency and quality with which behavioral health treatment implementation is evaluated. SIRC’s membership growth is a testament to this identified need with more than 1000 members from 2011 to the present.ii SIRC’s primary objectives are to: (1) foster communication and collaboration across diverse groups, including implementation researchers, intermediariesi, as well as community stakeholders (SIRC uses the term “EBP champions” for these groups) – and to do so across multiple career levels (e.g., students, early career faculty, established investigators); and (2) enhance and disseminate rigorous measures and methodologies for implementing EBPs and evaluating EBP implementation efforts. These objectives are well aligned with Glasgow and colleagues’ [4] five core tenets deemed critical for advancing implementation science: collaboration, efficiency and speed, rigor and relevance, improved capacity, and cumulative knowledge. SIRC advances these objectives and tenets through in-person conferences, which bring together multidisciplinary implementation researchers and those implementing evidence-based behavioral health interventions in the community to share their work and create professional connections and collaborations

Understanding the Appropriateness of Standards on Kindergarten Achievement in California: A Developmental Perspective

With the California educational system putting a greater emphasis on increasing academic standards in early childhood education, kindergarten students will be affected. In particular, there has been a statewide push toward increasing literacy by enforcing more rigorous language arts expectations for kindergarten entrance and the kindergarten year. Therefore, the purpose of this literature review is to explore the appropriateness of this increased standard’s movement relative to the developmental perspectives about children’s cognitive growth. Specifically, this review identifies the theories and research that stress the significance of understanding the development of cognition and learning in children as a foundation for creating and implementing appropriate educational practices and standards to achieve optimal academic success in kindergarten children in California

The Scientific Basis for Law as a Public Health Tool

Systematic reviews are generating valuable scientific knowledge about the impact of public health laws, but this knowledge is not readily accessible to policy makers. We identified 65 systematic reviews of studies on the effectiveness of 52 public health laws: 27 of those laws were found effective, 23 had insufficient evidence to judge effectiveness, 1 was harmful, and 1 was found to be ineffective. This is a valuable, scientific foundation—that uses the highest relevant standard of evidence—for the role of law as a public health tool