Xpert MTB/RIF as add-on test to microscopy in a low tuberculosis incidence setting

10nonenoneSulis, G; Agliati, A; Pinsi, G; Bozzola, G; Foccoli, P; Gulletta, M; Caligaris, S; Tomasoni, LR; El-Hamad, I; Matteelli, A;Sulis, G; Agliati, A; Pinsi, G; Bozzola, G; Foccoli, P; Gulletta, M; Caligaris, S; Tomasoni, Lr; El-Hamad, I; Matteelli,

Multicentre European study for the treatment of advanced emphysema with bronchial valves

This multicentre, blinded, sham-controlled study was performed to assess the safety and effectiveness of bronchial valve therapy using a bilateral upper lobe treatment approach without the goal of lobar atelectasis. Patients with upper lobe predominant severe emphysema were randomised to bronchoscopy with (n=37) or without (n=36) IBV Valves for a 3-month blinded phase. A positive responder was defined as having both a ≥4-point improvement in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and a lobar volume shift as measured by quantitative computed tomography. At 3 months, there were eight (24%) positive responders in the treated group versus none (0%) in the control group (p=0.002). Also, there was a significant shift in volume in the treated group from the upper lobes (mean±SD -7.3±9.0%) to the non-treated lobes (6.7±14.5%), with minimal change in the control group (p<0.05). Mean SGRQ total score improved in both groups (treatment: -4.3±16.2; control: -3.6±10.7). The procedure and devices were well tolerated and there were no differences in adverse events reported in the treatment and control groups. Treatment with bronchial valves without complete lobar occlusion in both upper lobes was safe, but not effective in the majority of patients. Copyright©ERS 2012.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Multicentric study of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration for lung cancer staging in Italy

Background: Multi-institutional studies of endobronchial-ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for mediastinal staging in lung cancer are scarce. It is unclear if the high diagnostic performance of EBUS-TBNA reported by experts' guidelines can be generally achieved. Methods: This is a retrospective study performed in five tertiary referral centers of thoracic surgery in Italy, to assess the EBUS-TBNA diagnostic performance in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient inclusion criteria were: both genders; > 18 years old; with suspect/confirmed NSCLC; undergoing EBUSTBNA for mediastinal node enlargement at computed tomography (size > 1 cm, \ue2\u89\ua43 cm) and/or pathological uptake at positron emission tomography. Altogether we included 485 patients [male, 366; female, 119; median age, 68 years (IQR, 61-74 years)] undergoing mediastinal staging between January 2011 and July 2016. All EBUS-TBNAs were performed by experienced bronchoscopists, without pre-defined quality standards. Depending on usual practice in each center, EBUS-TBNA was done under conscious sedation, with 21- or 22-Gauge (G) needle, and specimen preparation was cell-block, or cytology slides, or core-tissue. Sampling was classified inadequate in absence of lymphocytes, or when sample was insufficient. We analyzed the EBUSTBNA procedural steps likely to influence the rate of adequate samplings (diagnostic yield). Results: EBUS-TBNA sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy respectively were 90%, 78% and 93% in the whole cohort. At multivariate analysis, use of 21-G needle was associated with better diagnostic yield (P < 0.001). Center and specimen processing technique were not independent factors affecting EBUS-TBNA diagnostic yield. Conclusions: In this multicentric study, EBUS-TBNA was a highly sensitive and accurate method for NSCLC mediastinal node staging. Results indicate better performance of EBUS-TBNA with 21-G needle, and suggest that specimen processing technique could be chosen according to the local practice preference