Patients' perspective on the impact of sentinel node biopsy in oral cancer treatment

Objective. Assessment of the impact of a sentinel node biopsy (SNB) based strategy in cT1/T2 N0 oral cancer on the course of health related quality of life, psychological distress, and shoulder disability, and evaluation of the patients' perspective on neck management strategies. Study Design. Fifty-two patients (39 SNB negative; 13 SNB positive) completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35, and the HADS, IES, and SDQ questionnaires at baseline, after SNB diagnosis and at 6 months of follow-up. Objective shoulder measurements were performed after 2 years and interviews were conducted after 4.5 months of follow-up. Results. All the scores of the questionnaires were not significantly different between SNB negative and SNB positive patients. Objective shoulder functioning was similar. Most patients preferred a SNB-based strategy to an elective neck dissection strategy. Conclusions. The impact of a SNB-based strategy in patients with cT1/T2 N0 oral cancer is comparable for SNB-negative and SNB-positive patients in terms of health-related quality of life, psychological distress and shoulder functioning. Most patients preferred the SNB-based strategy over the elective neck dissection strategy

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically N0 T1-T2 staged oral cancer:The Dutch multicenter trial

Objectives Results of the Dutch multi-institutional trial on sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in oral cancer. Patients and methods Patients were consecutively enrolled from 4 institutions, with T1/T2 oral cancer and cN0 neck based on palpation and ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology. Lymphatic mapping consisted of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. For intraoperative SLN detection a gamma-probe was used and in some patients additional blue dye. SLN negative patients were carefully observed, SLN positive patients were treated by neck dissection, radiotherapy or a combination of both. Endpoints of the study were risk of occult lymp node metastases, neck control, accuracy, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results Twenty of 62 patients (32%) had positive SLNs. Macrometastases were found in 9 patients, micrometastases in 8, and isolated tumour cells in 3 patients. Median follow-up was 52.5 months. Of the 42 SLN negative patients, 5 developed a regional recurrence of whom 4 patients could be successfully salvaged. DFS, OS and DSS of SLN negative patients were 72.0%, 92.7% and 97.4%, and for SLN positive patients these numbers were 73.7%, 79.7%, 85.0%, respectively (DFS: p = 0.916, OS: p = 0.134, DSS: p = 0.059, respectively). Neck control rate was 97% in SLN negative and 95% in SLN positive patients. Sensitivity was 80% and negative predictive value 88%. Conclusion SLN biopsy is able to reduce the risk of occult lymph node metastases in T1/T2 oral cancer patients from 40% to 8%, and enables excellent control of the neck

Sentinel node in oral cancer: the nuclear medicine aspects: a survey from the sentinel european node trial

PURPOSE: Nuclear imaging plays a crucial role in lymphatic mapping of oral cancer. This evaluation represents a subanalysis of the original multicenter SENT trial data set, involving 434 patients with T1-T2, N0, and M0 oral squamous cell carcinoma. The impact of acquisition techniques, tracer injection timing relative to surgery, and causes of false-negative rate were assessed. METHODS: Three to 24 hours before surgery, all patients received a dose of Tc-nanocolloid (10-175 MBq), followed by lymphoscintigraphy. According to institutional protocols, all patients underwent preoperative dynamic/static scan and/or SPECT/CT. RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy identified 723 lymphatic basins. 1398 sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) were biopsied (3.2 SN per patient; range, 1-10). Dynamic scan allowed the differentiation of sentinel nodes from second tier lymph nodes. SPECT/CT allowed more accurate anatomical localization and estimated SN depth more efficiently. After pathological examination, 9.9% of the SN excised (138 of 1398 SNs) showed metastases. The first neck level (NL) containing SN+ was NL I in 28.6%, NL IIa in 44.8%, NL IIb in 2.8%, NL III in 17.1%, and NL IV in 6.7% of positive patients. Approximately 96% of positive SNs were localized in the first and second lymphatic basin visualized using lymphoscintigraphy. After neck dissection, the SN+ was the only lymph node containing metastasis in approximately 80% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Best results were observed using a dynamic scan in combination with SPECT/CT. A shorter interval between tracer injection, imaging, and surgery resulted in a lower false-negative rate. At least 2 NLs have to be harvested, as this may increase the detection of lymphatic metastases

Sentinel European Node Trial (SENT): 3-year results of sentinel node biopsy in oral cancer.

PURPOSE: Optimum management of the N0 neck is unresolved in oral cancer. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) can reliably detect microscopic lymph node metastasis. The object of this study was to establish whether the technique was both reliable in staging the N0 neck and a safe oncological procedure in patients with early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: An European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-approved prospective, observational study commenced in 2005. Fourteen European centres recruited 415 patients with radiologically staged T1-T2N0 squamous cell carcinoma. SNB was undertaken with an average of 3.2 nodes removed per patient. Patients were excluded if the sentinel node (SN) could not be identified. A positive SN led to a neck dissection within 3 weeks. Analysis was performed at 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: An SN was found in 99.5% of cases. Positive SNs were found in 23% (94 in 415). A false-negative result occurred in 14% (15 in 109) of patients, of whom eight were subsequently rescued by salvage therapy. Recurrence after a positive SNB and subsequent neck dissection occurred in 22 patients, of which 16 (73%) were in the neck and just six patients were rescued. Only minor complications (3%) were reported following SNB. Disease-specific survival was 94%. The sensitivity of SNB was 86% and the negative predictive value 95%. CONCLUSION: These data show that SNB is a reliable and safe oncological technique for staging the clinically N0 neck in patients with T1 and T2 oral cancer. EORTC Protocol 24021: Sentinel Node Biopsy in the Management of Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Implications of a positive sentinel node in oral squamous cell carcinoma

The results are preliminary but suggest that both the number and the position of positive sentinel nodes may identify different prognostic groups that may allow further tailoring of management plans

Sentinel Node in Oral Cancer:The Nuclear Medicine Aspects. A Survey from the Sentinel European Node Trial

Purpose: Nuclear imaging plays a crucial role in lymphatic mapping of oral cancer. This evaluation represents a subanalysis of the original multicenter SENT trial data set, involving 434 patientswith T1-T2, N0, and M0 oral squamous cell carcinoma. The impact of acquisition techniques, tracer injection timing relative to surgery, and causes of false-negative rate were assessed. Methods: Three to 24 hours before surgery, all patients received a dose of 99mTc-nanocolloid (10-175 MBq), followed by lymphoscintigraphy. According to institutional protocols, all patients underwent preoperative dynamic/ static scan and/or SPECT/CT. Results: Lymphoscintigraphy identified 723 lymphatic basins. 1398 sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) were biopsied (3.2 SN per patient; range, 1-10). Dynamic scan allowed the differentiation of sentinel nodes from second tier lymph nodes. SPECT/CT allowed more accurate anatomical localization and estimated SN depth more efficiently. After pathological examination, 9.9% of the SN excised (138 of 1398 SNs) showed metastases. The first neck level (NL) containing SN+ was NL I in 28.6%, NL IIa in 44.8%, NL IIb in 2.8%, NL III in 17.1%, and NL IV in 6.7% of positive patients. Approximately 96% of positive SNs were localized in the first and second lymphatic basin visualized using lymphoscintigraphy. After neck dissection, the SN+ was the only lymph node containing metastasis in approximately 80% of patients. Conclusions: Best results were observed using a dynamic scan in combination with SPECT/CT. A shorter interval between tracer injection, imaging, and surgery resulted in a lower false-negative rate. At least 2 NLs have to be harvested, as this may increase the detection of lymphatic metastases