Dosimetry during intramedullary nailing of the tibia: Patient and occupational exposure

Background Intramedullary nailing under fluoroscopic guidance is a common operation. We studied the intraoperative radiation dose received by both the patient and the personnel

Comparing radiation exposure during percutaneous vertebroplasty using one- vs. two-fluoroscopic technique

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) requires relatively lengthy fluoroscopic guidance, which might lead to substantial radiation exposure to patients or operators. The two-fluoroscopic technique (two-plane radiographs obtained using two fluoroscopes) during PV can provide simultaneous two-planar projections with reducing operative time. However, the two-fluoroscopic technique may expose the operator or patient to increased radiation dose. The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of radiation exposure to the patient or operator that occurs during PV using one- vs. two-fluoroscopic technique.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two radiation dosimeters were placed on the right flank of each patient and on the upper sternum of each operator during 26 single-level PV procedures by one senior surgeon. The use of two-fluoroscopic technique (13 patients) and one-fluoroscopic technique (13 patients) were allocated in a consecutive and alternative manner. The operative time and mean radiation dose to each patient and operator were monitored and compared between groups.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean radiation dose to the patient was 1.97 ± 1.20 mSv (95% CI, 0.71 to 3.23) for the one-fluoroscopic technique group vs. 0.95 ± 0.34 mSv (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.23) for the two-fluoroscopic technique group (<it>P</it> =0.031). Mean radiation dose to the operator was 0.27 ± 0.12 mSv (95% CI, 0.17–0.56) for the one-fluoroscopic technique group vs. 0.25 ± 0.14 mSv (95% CI, 0.06–0.44) for the two-fluoroscopic technique group (<it>P</it> = 0.653). The operative time was significantly different between groups: 47.15 ± 13.48 min (range, 20–75) for the one-fluoroscopic technique group vs. 36.62 ± 8.42 min (range, 21–50) for the two-fluoroscopic technique group (<it>P</it> =0.019).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Compared to the one-fluoroscopic technique, the two-fluoroscopic technique used during PV provides not only shorter operative times but also reduces the radiation exposure to the patient. There was no significant difference between the two techniques with regards to radiation exposure to the operator.</p

Radiation exposure and avoidance in minimally invasive spine surgery

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019. The advent of minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS or MISS) heralds an important milestone in the surgical management of spinal disorders. MIS provides the modern spine surgeon the ability to treat spine pathology in a precise, less morbid manner when compared to open procedures. The benefits of MIS over open procedures include, but are not limited to, decreased blood loss, decreased infection rates, and decreased hospital length of stay. These benefits of MIS coexist with the burden of an increased reliance on radiographic imaging in the operating theater. Radiography in MIS can produce significant amounts of radiation, placing both the surgeon and patient at risk. Efforts to limit radiation exposure in MIS stem from a basic understanding of the physical nature of ionizing radiation and its effects on living tissue. Although the quantity of radiation produced in various MIS procedures varies in the literature, a surgeon’s hands and thyroid gland may represent structures consistently at risk. Techniques to limit radiation exposure include preoperative considerations, such as prudently planning when imaging is necessary during a case, and intraoperative adjustments such as appropriately positioning the radiation source in relation to the patient and surgeon. Knowledge of these techniques allows spine surgeons to effectively perform MIS while simultaneously reducing radiation exposure

The effects of low dose X-irradiation on osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells in vitro

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It has been indicated that moderate or high dose of X-irradiation could delay fracture union and cause osteoradionecrosis, in part, mediated by its effect on proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts. However, whether low dose irradiation (LDI) has similar roles on osteoblasts is still unknown. In this study, we investigated whether and to what extent LDI could affect the proliferation, differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts in vitro.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The MC3T3-E1 cells were exposed to single dose of X-irradiation with 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 Gy respectively. Cell proliferation, apoptosis, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and mineralization was evaluated by methylthiazoletetrazolium (MTT) and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) assay, flow cytometry, ALP viability kit and von Kossa staining, respectively. Osteocalcin (OCN) and core-binding factor α1 (Cbfα1) expressions were measured by real time-PCR and western blot, respectively.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The proliferation of the cells exposed to 2.0 Gy was significantly lower than those exposed to ≤1.0 Gy (p < 0.05) from Day 4 to Day 8, measured by MTT assay and BrdU incorporation. For cells exposed to ≤1.0 Gy, increasing dosages of X-irradiation had no significant effect on cell proliferation and apoptosis. Importantly, LDI of 0.5 and 1 Gy increased ALP activities and mineralized nodules of MC3T3-E1 cells. In addition, mRNA and protein expressions of OCN and Cbfα1 were also markedly increased after treatment with LDI at 0.5 and 1 Gy.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>LDI have different effects on proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts from those of high dose of X-irradiation, which might suggest that LDI could lead to promotion of frature healing through enhancing the differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts.</p