Predictors of adverse prognosis in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Identification of reliable outcome predictors in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is of paramount importance for improving patient's management. Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted until 24 April 2020. From 6843 articles, 49 studies were selected for a pooled assessment; cumulative statistics for age and sex were retrieved in 587 790 and 602 234 cases. Two endpoints were defined: (a) a composite outcome including death, severe presentation, hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU) and/or mechanical ventilation; and (b) in-hospital mortality. We extracted numeric data on patients’ characteristics and cases with adverse outcomes and employed inverse variance random-effects models to derive pooled estimates. Results: We identified 18 and 12 factors associated with the composite endpoint and death, respectively. Among those, a history of CVD (odds ratio (OR) = 3.15, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 2.26-4.41), acute cardiac (OR = 10.58, 5.00-22.40) or kidney (OR = 5.13, 1.78-14.83) injury, increased procalcitonin (OR = 4.8, 2.034-11.31) or D-dimer (OR = 3.7, 1.74-7.89), and thrombocytopenia (OR = 6.23, 1.031-37.67) conveyed the highest odds for the adverse composite endpoint. Advanced age, male sex, cardiovascular comorbidities, acute cardiac or kidney injury, lymphocytopenia and D-dimer conferred an increased risk of in-hospital death. With respect to the treatment of the acute phase, therapy with steroids was associated with the adverse composite endpoint (OR = 3.61, 95% CI 1.934-6.73), but not with mortality. Conclusions: Advanced age, comorbidities, abnormal inflammatory and organ injury circulating biomarkers captured patients with an adverse clinical outcome. Clinical history and laboratory profile may then help identify patients with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality

Percutaneous closure of a very wide interatrial septal defect: clinical case and literature review

Percutaneous transcatheter closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defects (ASD) is the gold-standard treatment, because of a comparable efficacy and less complications than heart surgery. Nevertheless, percutaneous treatment of very large ASD is still considered a challenging procedure and is discouraged for diameters larger than 38 mm, especially when atrial septal rims are absent. These patients are characterized by more frequent complications when a percutaneous approach is attempted. Hence, the treatment of choice is still debated. We report the case of a 75-year-old Caucasian male, admitted for congestive heart failure secondary to a very large ASD. After accurate sizing with transesophageal echocardiography and sizing balloon, percutaneous closure with an Amplatzer Septal Occluder was successfully performed, using few simple tricks

Normal ranges of left atrial volumes and ejection fraction by 3D echocardiography in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Increased sizes and dysfunction of the left atrium have been related to adverse outcomes. 3D-echocardiography is more accurate than 2D-echocardiography in estimating LA volumes and ejection fraction. However, the use of 3DE for LA analysis is limited by the absence of established reference values. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide reference ranges of LA maximum and minimum volumes indexed for body surface area (LAVi max and LAVi min, respectively), and LA-EF assessed by 3DE in healthy adults. Data search was conducted from inception through September 15, 2021, using the following Medical Subject Heading terms: left atrial/atrium, three-dimensional/3D echocardiography. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021252428). 15 studies including 4,226 healthy adults (51% males) and reporting 3DE values of LAVi max, LAVi min and LA-EF were selected. LAVi max, LAVi min and LA-EF mean and reference values were equal to 25.18 ml/m2 (95% CI 23.10, 27.26), 11.10 ml/m2 (10.01, 12.18) and 55.94% (51.92, 59.96), respectively. No influential studies were identified. Pooled estimates per age group- and sex were also estimated. By meta-regression analyses, we identified variability in LA volumes and LA-EF depending on participants’ age, ethnicity and number of heart cycles at 3D multi-beat acquisition. At individual patient data analysis conducted on 374 subjects, a software effect on LA-EF was shown. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides reference values of LAVi max, LAVi min and LA-EF assessed by 3DE in healthy adults, encouraging 3DE evaluation of the LA evaluation in daily practice. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V

Echocardiography versus computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of left heart thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Accurate and reproducible diagnostic techniques are essential to detect left-sided cardiac thrombi [either in the left ventricle (LV) or in the left atrial appendage (LAA)] and to guide the onset and duration of antithrombotic treatment while minimizing the risk for thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to compare the diagnostic performance of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) vs. cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the detection of LV thrombi, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) vs. computed tomography (CT) for the detection of LAA thrombi. Results: Six studies were included in the first meta-analysis (TTE vs. CMR for LV thrombosis). Pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 62% [95% confidence interval (CI), 37–81%] and 97% (95% CI, 94–99%). The shape of the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 suggested a high accuracy. Ten studies were included in the second meta-analysis (CT versus TEE for LAA thrombosis). The pooled values of sensitivity and specificity were 97% (95% CI, 77–100%) and 94% (95% CI, 87–98%). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 500 (95% CI, 52–4810), and the pooled likelihood ratios (LR + and LR−) were 17% (95% CI, 7–40%) and 3% (95% CI, 0–28%). The shape of the HSROC curve and 0.99 AUC suggested a high accuracy of CT vs. TEE. Conclusions: TTE is a fair alternative to DE-CMR for the identification of LV thrombi, while CT has a good accuracy compared to TEE for the detection of LAA thrombosis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020185842