The repeatability of cognitive performance:A meta-analysis

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from The Royal Society via the DOI in this record.Behavioural and cognitive processes play important roles in mediating an individual's interactions with its environment. Yet, while there is a vast literature on repeatable individual differences in behaviour, relatively little is known about the repeatability of cognitive performance. To further our understanding of the evolution of cognition, we gathered 44 studies on individual performance of 25 species across six animal classes and used meta-analysis to assess whether cognitive performance is repeatable. We compared repeatability (R) in performance (1) on the same task presented at different times (temporal repeatability), and (2) on different tasks that measured the same putative cognitive ability (contextual repeatability). We also addressed whether R estimates were influenced by seven extrinsic factors (moderators): type of cognitive performance measurement, type of cognitive task, delay between tests, origin of the subjects, experimental context, taxonomic class and publication status. We found support for both temporal and contextual repeatability of cognitive performance, with mean R estimates ranging between 0.15 and 0.28. Repeatability estimates were mostly influenced by the type of cognitive performance measures and publication status. Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of consistent inter-individual variation in cognition across a range of taxa which, like behaviour, may be associated with fitness outcomes.PKYC is supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (PE1801); JOvH was funded by an ERC consolidator grant (616474). MC and this research was supported by a grant from the Human Frontier Science Program to ASC and JM-F (RGP0006/2015)

A pair production telescope for medium-energy gamma-ray polarimetry

We describe the science motivation and development of a pair production telescope for medium-energy (∼5–200 MeV) gamma-ray polarimetry. Our instrument concept, the Advanced Energetic Pair Telescope (AdEPT), takes advantage of the Three-Dimensional Track Imager, a low-density gaseous time projection chamber, to achieve angular resolution within a factor of two of the pair production kinematics limit (∼0.6° at 70 MeV), continuum sensitivity comparable with the Fermi-LAT front detector (<3 × 10−6 MeV cm−2 s−1 at 70 MeV), and minimum detectable polarization less than 10% for a 10 mCrab source in 106 s.submittedVersionFil: Hunter, Stanley D. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Goddard Space Flight Center; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Bloser, Peter F. University of New Hampshire. Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space. Space Science Center; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Depaola, Gerardo Osvaldo. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física; Argentina.Fil: Dion, Michael P. Department of Energy. Office of Science. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: DeNolfo, Georgia A. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Goddard Space Flight Center; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Hanu, Andrei. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Goddard Space Flight Center; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Iparraguirre, Lorenzo Marcos. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física; Argentina.Fil: Legere, Jason. University of New Hampshire. Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space. Space Science Center; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Longo, Francesco. Università Degli Studi de Trieste. Dipartimento di fisica; Italia.Fil: McConnell, Mark L. University of New Hampshire. Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space. Space Science Center; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Nowicki, Suzanne F. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Goddard Space Flight Center; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Nowicki, Suzanne F. University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Department of Physics; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Ryan, James M. University of New Hampshire. Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space. Space Science Center; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Son, Seunghee. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Goddard Space Flight Center; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Son, Seunghee. University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Department of Physics; Estados Unidos de América.Fil: Stecker, Floyd W. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Goddard Space Flight Center; Estados Unidos de América.Física de Partículas y Campo

Panel. Faulkner\u27s Wars

Finding Faulkner’s War: Frontlines and Homefronts from Yoknapatawpha to Verdun / Dotty J. Dye, Arizona State UniversityFaulkner’s work is grounded in place and time, as his most famous and canonized work demonstrates, but a more complicated consideration shows that he did not limit himself to that specificity of place and that he actually struggled against such a tendency throughout his career. Rather, he grounds most of his writing in the South, first as a turn to writing about “what he knows” and second to provide a foundation for a more universalizing project. I hope to prompt consideration of the connections, in Faulkner’s fiction, between World War I ravaged France and Civil War ravaged South, as both homespaces and battlefronts and I argue that this correspondence broadens the imaginary world that Faulkner created. Things are back to normal again: Reassessing Soldiers’ Pay / Jason D. Fichtel, Joliet Junior CollegeNear the end of Soldiers’ Pay, The Rector claims that “things are back to normal again,” yet despite his hope nothing is ever “back to normal” after the trauma of war. In this essay I explore the ways in which Soldiers’ Pay reveals to us the multiple traumas inflicted on soldier and civilian alike, as well as how Faulkner’s language and technique illustrate his opening salvo in a battle with language itself—to make it say what is too often unsayable. As we gather to commemorate “Fifty Years After Faulkner” there is perhaps no better time for us to reassess Faulkner’s first novel and its attempt to grapple with personal and communal trauma, and the devastation of war. William Faulkner’s African American Civil War: A Sesquicentennial Consideration / Andrew Leiter, Lycoming CollegeThis essay examines Faulkner’s representations of African Americans during the Civil War era who assert themselves in ways incongruous with romanticized notions of master-slave relationships. Framed by a consideration of Deacon’s claims of service with the Union army in The Sound and the Fury but concentrating primarily on The Unvanquished, this essay contends that Faulkner conceives of the family as an enclosure delimiting African American freedom in a manner comfortable for his white characters. This familial enclosure, however, is less reflective of Faulkner’s defense of racial patriarchy than it is a self-conscious exploration of how whites restructure the African American experience of freedom in a manner at odds with reality

The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis

International audienceOne contribution of 15 to a theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'. Behavioural and cognitive processes play important roles in mediating an individual's interactions with its environment. Yet, while there is a vast literature on repeatable individual differences in behaviour, relatively little is known about the repeatability of cognitive performance. To further our understanding of the evolution of cogni-tion, we gathered 44 studies on individual performance of 25 species across six animal classes and used meta-analysis to assess whether cognitive performance is repea-table. We compared repeatability (R) in performance (1) on the same task presented at different times (temporal repeat-ability), and (2) on different tasks that measured the same putative cognitive ability (contextual repeatability). We also addressed whether R estimates were influenced by seven extrinsic factors (moderators): type of cognitive performance measurement, type of cognitive task, delay between tests, origin of the subjects, experimental context, taxonomic class and publication status. We found support for both temporal and contextual repeatability of cognitive performance, with mean R estimates ranging between 0.15 and 0.28. Repeatability estimates were mostly influenced by the type of cognitive performance measures and publication status. Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of consistent inter-individual variation in cog-nition across a range of taxa which, like behaviour, may be associated with fitness outcomes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'

Multiwavelength observations of the February 1996 high-energy flare in the blazar 3C 279

We report CGRO, RXTE, ASCA, ROSAT, IUE, HST and ground-based observations of a large flare in 3C 279 in February 1996. X-rays and γ-rays peaked simultaneously (within one day). We show simultaneous spectral energy distributions prior to and near the flare peak. The γ-ray flare was the brightest ever observed in this sourc

Datasets methods, general methods and supplemental results from The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis

Behavioural and cognitive processes play important roles in mediating an individual's interactions with its environment. Yet, while there is a vast literature on repeatable individual differences in behaviour, relatively little is known about the repeatability of cognitive performance. To further our understanding of the evolution of cognition, we gathered 44 studies on individual performance of 25 species across six animal classes and used meta-analysis to assess whether cognitive performance is repeatable. We compared repeatability (<i>R</i>) in performance (1) on the same task presented at different times (temporal repeatability), and (2) on different tasks that measured the same putative cognitive ability (contextual repeatability). We also addressed whether <i>R</i> estimates were influenced by seven extrinsic factors (moderators): type of cognitive performance measurement, type of cognitive task, delay between tests, origin of the subjects, experimental context, taxonomic class and publication status. We found support for both temporal and contextual repeatability of cognitive performance, with mean <i>R</i> estimates ranging between 0.15 and 0.28. Repeatability estimates were mostly influenced by the type of cognitive performance measures and publication status. Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of consistent inter-individual variation in cognition across a range of taxa which, like behaviour, may be associated with fitness outcomes.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive ability’

Datasets methods, general methods and supplemental results from The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis

Behavioural and cognitive processes play important roles in mediating an individual's interactions with its environment. Yet, while there is a vast literature on repeatable individual differences in behaviour, relatively little is known about the repeatability of cognitive performance. To further our understanding of the evolution of cognition, we gathered 44 studies on individual performance of 25 species across six animal classes and used meta-analysis to assess whether cognitive performance is repeatable. We compared repeatability (<i>R</i>) in performance (1) on the same task presented at different times (temporal repeatability), and (2) on different tasks that measured the same putative cognitive ability (contextual repeatability). We also addressed whether <i>R</i> estimates were influenced by seven extrinsic factors (moderators): type of cognitive performance measurement, type of cognitive task, delay between tests, origin of the subjects, experimental context, taxonomic class and publication status. We found support for both temporal and contextual repeatability of cognitive performance, with mean <i>R</i> estimates ranging between 0.15 and 0.28. Repeatability estimates were mostly influenced by the type of cognitive performance measures and publication status. Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of consistent inter-individual variation in cognition across a range of taxa which, like behaviour, may be associated with fitness outcomes.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive ability’