3 research outputs found

    Amplification of EDHF-type vasodilatations in TRPC1-deficient mice

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: TRPC1 channels are expressed in the vasculature and are putative candidates for intracellular Ca(2+) handling. However, little is known about their role in endothelium-dependent vasodilatations including endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) vasodilatations, which require activation of Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels (K(Ca)). To provide molecular information on the role of TRPC1 for K(Ca) function and the EDHF signalling complex, we examined endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilatations, K(Ca) currents and smooth muscle contractility in TRPC1-deficient mice (TRPC1-/-). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Vascular responses were studied using pressure/wire myography and intravital microscopy. We performed electrophysiological measurements, and confocal Ca(2+) imaging for studying K(Ca) channel functions and Ca(2+) sparks. KEY RESULTS: TRPC1 deficiency in carotid arteries produced a twofold augmentation of TRAM-34- and UCL1684-sensitive EDHF-type vasodilatations and of endothelial hyperpolarization to acetylcholine. NO-mediated vasodilatations were unchanged. TRPC1-/- exhibited enhanced EDHF-type vasodilatations in resistance-sized arterioles in vivo associated with reduced spontaneous tone. Endothelial IK(Ca)/SK(Ca)-type K(Ca) currents, smooth muscle cell Ca(2+) sparks and associated BK(Ca)-mediated spontaneous transient outward currents were unchanged in TRPC1-/-. Smooth muscle contractility induced by receptor-operated Ca(2+) influx or Ca(2+) release and endothelium-independent vasodilatations were unaltered in TRPC1-/-. TRPC1-/- exhibited lower systolic blood pressure as determined by tail-cuff blood pressure measurements. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our data demonstrate that TRPC1 acts as a negative regulator of endothelial K(Ca) channel-dependent EDHF-type vasodilatations and thereby contributes to blood pressure regulation. Thus, we propose a specific role of TRPC1 in the EDHF–K(Ca) signalling complex and suggest that pharmacological inhibition of TRPC1, by enhancing EDHF vasodilatations, may be a novel strategy for lowering blood pressure

    The SIDECAR project : S-IcD registry in European paediatriC and young Adult patients with congenital heaRt defects

    No full text
    AIMS: Subcutaneous-implantable cardiac defibrillators (S-ICDs) are used increasingly to prevent sudden cardiac death in young patients. This study was set up to gain insight in the indications for S-ICD, possible complications, and their predictors and follow-up results. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multicentre, observational, retrospective, non-randomized, standard-of-care registry on S-ICD outcome in young patients with congenital heart diseases (CHDs), inherited arrhythmias (IAs), idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF), and cardiomyopathies (CMPs). Anthropometry was registered as well as implantation technique, mid-term device-related complications, and incidence of appropriate/inappropriate shocks (IASs). Data are reported as median (interquartile range) or mean ± standard deviation. Eighty-one patients (47% CMPs, 20% CHD, 21% IVF, and 12% IA), aged 15 (14-17) years, with body mass index (BMI) 21.8 ± 3.8 kg/m2, underwent S-ICD implantation (primary prevention in 59%). This was performed with two-incision technique in 81% and with a subcutaneous pocket in 59%. Shock and conditional zones were programmed at 250 (200-250) and 210 (180-240) b.p.m., respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred. Follow up was 19 (6-35) months: no defibrillation failure occurred, 17% of patients received appropriate shocks, 13% of patients received IAS (supraventricular tachycardias 40%, T-wave oversensing 40%, and non-cardiac oversensing 20%). Reprogramming, proper drug therapy, and surgical revision avoided further IAS. Complications requiring surgical revision occurred in 9% of patients, with higher risks in patients with three-incision procedures [hazard ratio (HR) 4.3, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.5-34, P = 0.038] and BMI 20 showed better outcome

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    No full text
    corecore