11 research outputs found
Metaphysics and biology a critique of David Wiggins' account of personal identity
Over his philosophical career, David Wiggins has produced a body of work that, though
varied and wide-ranging, stands as a coherent and carefully integrated whole. Its parts
cannot be studied in isolation, and a central aim of this thesis is to examine how three
vital elements of his systematic metaphysics interconnect: his conceptualist-realism, his sortal
theory âDâ, and his account of personal identity â his human being theory.
Yet critics murder to dissect, and Wigginsâ project is often unfairly decomposed
into its parts. Thus, this study aims both to introduce his thoughts without neglecting
the relations between them, and to rectify the various misinterpretations of them by â
among others â Paul Snowdon, Eric Olson and Lynne Rudder Baker.
In clarifying and exploring these connections another sunken, yet central, vein is
revealed. It is argued that Wigginsâ metaphysics bears on, and is borne upon, by various
discussions in the philosophy of biology. This is a connection that he himself adverts to, but
which commentators have rarely investigated. Attending to it, one finds in his analyses
of natural substances a novel form of biological anti-reductionism, which stands as a
productive alternative to emergentism.
Closer attention to his construal of substances â specifically organisms â also
reveals a worry. At the core of Wigginsâ account of personal identity is the consilience
he sees between the concept of a person and the concept of a natural substance (a
human being). It is argued below that organ transplantation disturbs the Aristotelian
distinction between natural substance and biological artefact, and thus tests the heart-string
of his human being theory
Metaphysics and biology a critique of David Wiggins' account of personal identity
Over his philosophical career, David Wiggins has produced a body of work that, though
varied and wide-ranging, stands as a coherent and carefully integrated whole. Its parts
cannot be studied in isolation, and a central aim of this thesis is to examine how three
vital elements of his systematic metaphysics interconnect: his conceptualist-realism, his sortal
theory âDâ, and his account of personal identity â his human being theory.
Yet critics murder to dissect, and Wigginsâ project is often unfairly decomposed
into its parts. Thus, this study aims both to introduce his thoughts without neglecting
the relations between them, and to rectify the various misinterpretations of them by â
among others â Paul Snowdon, Eric Olson and Lynne Rudder Baker.
In clarifying and exploring these connections another sunken, yet central, vein is
revealed. It is argued that Wigginsâ metaphysics bears on, and is borne upon, by various
discussions in the philosophy of biology. This is a connection that he himself adverts to, but
which commentators have rarely investigated. Attending to it, one finds in his analyses
of natural substances a novel form of biological anti-reductionism, which stands as a
productive alternative to emergentism.
Closer attention to his construal of substances â specifically organisms â also
reveals a worry. At the core of Wigginsâ account of personal identity is the consilience
he sees between the concept of a person and the concept of a natural substance (a
human being). It is argued below that organ transplantation disturbs the Aristotelian
distinction between natural substance and biological artefact, and thus tests the heart-string
of his human being theory
Current state-of-the-art and gaps in platform trials: 10 things you should know, insights from EU-PEARL
Summary: Platform trials bring the promise of making clinical research more efficient and more patient centric. While their use has become more widespread, including their prominent role during the COVID-19 pandemic response, broader adoption of platform trials has been limited by the lack of experience and tools to navigate the critical upfront planning required to launch such collaborative studies. The European Union-Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatform (EU-PEARL) initiative has produced new methodologies to expand the use of platform trials with an overarching infrastructure and services embedded into Integrated Research Platforms (IRPs), in collaboration with patient representatives and through consultation with U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency stakeholders. In this narrative review, we discuss the outlook for platform trials in Europe, including challenges related to infrastructure, design, adaptations, data sharing and regulation. Documents derived from the EU-PEARL project, alongside a literature search including PubMed and relevant grey literature (e.g., guidance from regulatory agencies and health technology agencies) were used as sources for a multi-stage collaborative process through which the 10 more important points based on lessons drawn from the EU-PEARL project were developed and summarised as guidance for the setup of platform trials. We conclude that early involvement of critical stakeholder such as regulatory agencies or patients are critical steps in the implementation and later acceptance of platform trials. Addressing these gaps will be critical for attaining the full potential of platform trials for patients. Funding: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking with support from the European Unionâs Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA