The Effect of Gastrostomy Placement on Gastric Function in Children : a Prospective Cohort Study

Background: A gastrostomy placement is frequently performed in pediatric patients who require long-term enteral tube feeding. Unfortunately, postoperative complications such as leakage, feeding intolerance, and gastroesophageal reflux frequently occur. These complications may be due to postoperative gastric dysmotility. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of gastrostomy placement on gastric emptying in children. Methods: A prospective study was performed including 50 children undergoing laparoscopic gastrostomy. Before and 3 months after gastrostomy, assessment was performed using the 13C-octanoic acid breath test, 24-h pH monitoring, and reflux symptom questionnaires. Results: Gastric half-emptying time significantly increased from the 57th to the 79th percentile (p 95) after gastrostomy (p = 0.01). Most patients (≥75%) with leakage and/or feeding intolerance after gastrostomy had DGE after operation. A decrease in gastric emptying was associated with an increase in esophageal acid exposure time (r = 0.375, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Gastrostomy placement in children causes a significant delay in gastric emptying. Postoperative DGE was associated with gastroesophageal reflux and was found in most patients with postoperative leakage and feeding intolerance. These negative physiologic effects should be taken into account when considering gastrostomy placement in children

Health-related quality of life in children after laparoscopic gastrostomy placement

Introduction: A gastrostomy placement (GP) is an established treatment to provide enteral feeding in pediatric patients with feeding difficulties aiming to improve nutritional status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to evaluate HRQoL in children with severe feeding difficulties who have undergone GP. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was performed including 128 patients who had undergone laparoscopic GP (2004–2011). HRQoL was evaluated using the validated Pediatric Quality of Life 4.0 Inventory. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of HRQoL. Results: After a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (interquartile range 2.9–6.2) after GP, mean HRQoL was 53.0 out of 100 (standard deviation 21.1). HRQoL was significantly lower in children with neurologic impairment, with a mean difference of −21.4 points between neurologically impaired and neurologically normal children (p < 0.001). HRQoL was also lower in children with cardiac disease (−19.0 points; p = 0.01) and in children with a history of previous gastrointestinal surgery (−15.2 points; p = 0.03). Feeding through a gastrojejunostomy tube (−33.0 points; p = 0.01) and higher age at the time of operation (−1.2 points per year; p = 0.03) were also associated with lower HRQoL. GP-related complications requiring reintervention were associated with lower HRQoL, although this association was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). Conclusions: Children with severe feeding difficulty, who have undergone GP, have significantly lower HRQoL compared to a healthy pediatric population. Neurologic impairment, cardiac disease, a history of gastrointestinal surgery, older age, and the need for jejunal feeding through the gastrostomy were predictive of even lower HRQoL

Gastro-esophageal reflux after laparoscopic gastrostomy placement in children

OBJECTIVES: Gastrostomy placement is frequently performed in pediatric patients who require long-term enteral tube feeding. Evidence on the influence of gastrostomy placement on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of gastrostomy on gastro-oesophageal reflux. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study was performed including 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrostomy between May 2012 and April 2014. Before and 3 months after surgery 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring was performed and caregivers filled out reflux symptom questionnaires. RESULTS: Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms were present in a comparable number of patients before (44%) and after gastrostomy placement (40%; P = 0.73). Twenty-five of the patients (50%) underwent both the preoperative and postoperative tests and were included in impedance-pH analysis. Acid exposure time (percentage of time with pH below 4) did not change significantly after gastrostomy placement: from 6.2% (3.0-18.1) to 6.1% (2.6-14.9). The number of reflux episodes did not significantly change, for either liquid [mean difference 4.3 (-4.5 to 13.2)] or mixed liquid-gas reflux [mean difference 2.0 (-9.3 to 13.3)]. Before gastrostomy placement, 18 out of 25 patients had pathological reflux (72%) on pH-impedance measurement. In 4 patients, pathological reflux dissolved, whereas 4 patients newly developed pathological reflux. A low preoperative weight-for-height percentile was associated with increased acid exposure after gastrostomy placement. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, gastrostomy placement was not associated with an increase in acid exposure on 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring. Similarly, the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux-related symptoms did not change after gastrostomy

The Effect of Gastrostomy Placement on Health-Related Quality of Life in Children

Background and purpose: A gastrostomy placement (GP) aims to improve nutritional status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children who require long-term enteral tube feeding. We evaluated the effect of GP on HRQoL. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study was performed including patients referred for laparoscopic GP. Children and/or caregivers were asked to fill out the validated PedsQL™ questionnaire before and 3 months after surgery. The aim was to compare preoperative with postoperative HRQoL and to identify predictors of HRQoL. Results: Fifty patients were included with a median age of 3.4 years (interquartile range 1.4–5.6). After GP, total HRQoL did not significantly increase (p = 0.30). However, psychosocial health significantly increased: 55.8 (standard deviation ± 20.8) to 61.2 (± 19.6; p = 0.03) on a 100-point scale. This was mainly owing to an increase in social HRQoL: 58.2 (± 32.3) to 68.3 (± 27.9; p = 0.04). HRQoL both before and after GP was significantly lower in children with neurologic impairment (p < 0.0005). However, neurologic impairment did not influence the effect of surgery on HRQoL (p = 0.66). Low preoperative body mass index was a predictor for improvement in HRQoL after GP. Conclusions: After GP in children, psychosocial HRQoL improved significantly. This was mainly owing to an improvement in social HRQoL. Level of evidence: I

Gastro-esophageal reflux after laparoscopic gastrostomy placement in children

OBJECTIVES: Gastrostomy placement is frequently performed in pediatric patients who require long-term enteral tube feeding. Evidence on the influence of gastrostomy placement on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of gastrostomy on gastro-oesophageal reflux. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study was performed including 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrostomy between May 2012 and April 2014. Before and 3 months after surgery 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring was performed and caregivers filled out reflux symptom questionnaires. RESULTS: Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms were present in a comparable number of patients before (44%) and after gastrostomy placement (40%; P = 0.73). Twenty-five of the patients (50%) underwent both the preoperative and postoperative tests and were included in impedance-pH analysis. Acid exposure time (percentage of time with pH below 4) did not change significantly after gastrostomy placement: from 6.2% (3.0-18.1) to 6.1% (2.6-14.9). The number of reflux episodes did not significantly change, for either liquid [mean difference 4.3 (-4.5 to 13.2)] or mixed liquid-gas reflux [mean difference 2.0 (-9.3 to 13.3)]. Before gastrostomy placement, 18 out of 25 patients had pathological reflux (72%) on pH-impedance measurement. In 4 patients, pathological reflux dissolved, whereas 4 patients newly developed pathological reflux. A low preoperative weight-for-height percentile was associated with increased acid exposure after gastrostomy placement. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, gastrostomy placement was not associated with an increase in acid exposure on 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring. Similarly, the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux-related symptoms did not change after gastrostomy