Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in endometrial cancer — a feasibility study using cervical injection of radiotracer and blue dye

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intra-operative gamma probe/blue dye for endometrial cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty four consecutive patients with endometrial cancer were recruited. All patients underwent lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy using combined intracervical radiotracer and blue dye injections. Pelvic lymph node dissection was performed for all patients. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy was done in high risk patients. All SLNs were examined by frozen section and Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) permanent sections. RESULTS: Pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy showed at least one SLN in 21/24 patients. Intra-operatively, at least one SLN could be harvested by gamma probe and/or blue dye methods. A total of 95 SLNs were detected. Four SLNs were detected only by blue dye, 42 only by radiotracer, and 49 were hot/blue. Median number of SLN per patient was 3. Three patients had positive pelvic lymph nodes. All of them had positive SLN (no false negative case). Frozen section could identify SLN involvement in two of three patients with positive pathology. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy is feasible and accurate in endometrial cancer patients using combined radiotracer and blue dye methods. Frozen section accuracy was lower and underscores the importance of expert pathologists for SLN mapping technique.

Added value of blue dye injection in sentinel node biopsy of breast cancer patients: Do all patients need blue dye?

AbstractBackgroundIn the current study, we evaluated the incremental value of blue dye injection in sentinel node mapping of early breast cancer patients. We specially considered the experience of the surgeons and lymphoscintigraphy results in this regard.Methods605 patients with early stage breast cancer were retrospectively evaluated in the study. Patients underwent sentinel node mapping using combined radiotracer and blue dye techniques. Lymphoscintiraphy was also performed for 590 patients. Blue dye, radioisotope, and overall success rates in identifying the sentinel lymph node were evaluated in different patient groups. The benefit of blue dye and radioisotope in identifying the sentinel lymph nodes was also evaluated.ResultsMarginal benefits of both blue dye and isotope for overall sentinel node detection as well as pathologically involved sentinel nodes were statistically higher in inexperienced surgeons and in patients with sentinel node visualization failure. In the patients with sentinel node visualization on lymphoscintigraphy, 6 sentinel nodes were detected by blue dye only. All these six nodes were harvested by inexperienced surgeons. On the other hand 8 sentinel nodes were detected by dye only in the patients with sentinel node non-visualization. All these nodes were harvested by experienced surgeons.ConclusionsThe use of blue dye should be reserved for inexperienced surgeons during their learning phase and for those patients in whom lymphoscintigraphy failed to show any uptake in the axilla