A Real-World Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Gliclazide Modified Release during Fasting in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: An Analysis from the International DIA-RAMADAN Study

Introduction: The safety and effectiveness of gliclazide modified release (MR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who fasted during Ramadan were previously published. Here, we carried out a regional analysis among patients living in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Patients and Methods: DIA-RAMADAN was a real-world, observational, international, noncomparative study conducted in nine countries that included >1200 T2DM adults receiving gliclazide MR for at least 90 days before inclusion. The study comprised 2 visits: at inclusion, 6–8 weeks before the start of Ramadan (V0) and 4–6 weeks after the end of Ramadan (V1). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients reporting ≥1 symptomatic hypoglycemic event as collected using a patient diary. Changes in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and weight were also analyzed. This manuscript represents data collected in GCC countries (Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates). Results: Data from 161 patients were analyzed: mean (SD) age 56.8 (10.6) years, 30.4% women, body mass index 29.1 (3.7) kg/m2, T2DM disease duration 6.7 (3.3) years, baseline HbA1c 7.9% (0.8). The proportions of patients reporting ≥1 symptomatic hypoglycemic event or confirmed hypoglycemia during Ramadan were 4.3% and 0.6%, respectively. No cases of severe hypoglycemia were reported. Significant reductions in main variables were observed before the start of Ramadan (V0) and 4–6 weeks after the end of Ramadan (V1): HbA1c (from 7.9 [0.8] to 7.6 [0.7]%; p value <0.001), FPG (from 143.5 [24.3] to 137.9 [25.2] mg/dL; p value = 0.031), and weight (from 79.0 [73.0–86.0] to 78.0 [72.0–85.0] kg; p value = 0.018). Conclusions: These real-world data indicate that patients with T2DM treated with gliclazide MR during Ramadan in the selected GCC countries have a low risk of hypoglycemia and maintain glycemic control and weight while fasting

Diabesity in the Arabian Gulf: Challenges and Opportunities

Diabesity (diabetes associated with obesity) is a major global and local public health concern, which has almost reached an epidemic order of magnitude in the countries of the Arabian Gulf and worldwide. We sought to review the lifestyle trends in this region and to highlight the challenges and opportunities that health care professionals face and attempt to address and correct them. In this regard, we aimed to review the regional data and widely held expert opinions in the Arabian Gulf and provide a thematic review of the size of the problem of diabesity and its risk factors, challenges, and opportunities. We also wished to delineate the barriers to health promotion, disease prevention, and identify social customs contributing to these challenges. Lastly, we wished to address specific problems with particular relevance to the region such as minimal exercise and unhealthy nutrition, concerns during pregnancy, the subject of childhood obesity, the impact of Ramadan fasting, and the expanding role of bariatric surgery. Finally, general recommendations for prevention, evidence-based, and culturally competent management strategies are presented to be considered at the levels of the individual, community, and policymakers

Quality of Care for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Dubai: A HEDIS-Like Assessment

Objective. As little data are available on the quality of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care in the Arabian Gulf States, we estimated the proportion of patients receiving recommended monitoring at the Dubai Hospital for T2DM over one year. Methods. Charts from 150 adults with T2DM were systematically sampled and quality of care was assessed during one calendar year, using a Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set- (HEDIS-) like assessment. Screening for glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), blood pressure, retinopathy, and nephropathy was considered. Patients were classified based on their most recent test in the period, and predictors of receiving quality care were examined. Results. Mean age was 58 years (standard deviation (SD): 12.4 years) and 33% were males. Over the year, 98% underwent HbA1c screening (50% had control and 28% displayed poor control); 91% underwent LDL screening (65% had control); 55% had blood pressure control; 30% had retinopathy screening; and 22% received attention for nephropathy. No individual characteristics examined predicted receiving quality care. Conclusion. Some guideline monitoring was conducted for most patients; and rates of monitoring for selected measures were comparable to benchmarks from the United States. Greater understanding of factors leading to high adherence would be useful for other areas of preventive care and other jurisdictions

Quality of Care for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Dubai: A HEDIS-Like Assessment

Objective. As little data are available on the quality of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care in the Arabian Gulf States, we estimated the proportion of patients receiving recommended monitoring at the Dubai Hospital for T2DM over one year. Methods. Charts from 150 adults with T2DM were systematically sampled and quality of care was assessed during one calendar year, using a Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set-(HEDIS-) like assessment. Screening for glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), blood pressure, retinopathy, and nephropathy was considered. Patients were classified based on their most recent test in the period, and predictors of receiving quality care were examined. Results. Mean age was 58 years (standard deviation (SD): 12.4 years) and 33% were males. Over the year, 98% underwent HbA1c screening (50% had control and 28% displayed poor control); 91% underwent LDL screening (65% had control); 55% had blood pressure control; 30% had retinopathy screening; and 22% received attention for nephropathy. No individual characteristics examined predicted receiving quality care. Conclusion. Some guideline monitoring was conducted for most patients; and rates of monitoring for selected measures were comparable to benchmarks from the United States. Greater understanding of factors leading to high adherence would be useful for other areas of preventive care and other jurisdictions