Vascular access in Senegalese patients starting chronic haemodialysis

Introduction: It is recommended that patients should start chronic haemodialysis using an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). We aimed to determine the proportion of Senegalese patients who used an AVF at the start of  haemodialysis and examined the factors associated with its use. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from 1 June 2021 to 2 October 2021 among patients on chronic haemodialysis in 10 centres in the Dakar and Thiès regions. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from medical records and also via patient interviews. Results: The patients (n = 543) had a median age of 50 years [interquartile range (IQR) 40–62 years] and 50.6% were male. The socio-economic level was low in two-thirds of cases. The median duration of haemodialysis was 40 (IQR 17–76) months. Hypertension was noted in 92% and diabetes in 13%. Hypertensive kidney disease was the cause of kidney failure in 33%. Only 47 patients (9%) had started dialysis using an arteriovenous fistula. Factors associated with its use at haemodialysis initiation were socio-economic level (OR 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25–0.94 for low socio-economic level) and duration of pre-dialysis follow-up by a nephrologist for >4 months (OR 7.82; 95% CI 3.05–26.50). In 65% of prevalent patients, the vascular access used was an AVF, a tunnelled central venous catheter in 28%, an arteriovenous graft in 2% and a temporary central venous catheter in 4.4%. Conclusions: The proportion of Senegalese patients with an AVF at the start of haemodialysis was low. AVF use was associated with socio-economic level and pre-dialysis follow-up by a nephrologist for >4 months

Isonatraemic haemodialysis in the management of salt and water overload: a crossover trial at an academic hospital in Dakar, Senegal

Introduction: The aims of this study were to assess the impact of isonatraemic haemodialysis on reduction of interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and blood pressure (BP) as well as its tolerability in our study population. Methods: This crossover trial, at the Aristide Le Dantec University Hospital in Senegal, was conducted on 32 patients with kidney failure who were stable on treatment with chronic haemodialysis. In the initial “control phase”, patients had nine haemodialysis sessions with a dialysate sodium (Na+) concentration (Na+ dialysate) of 138 mmol/L. The serum Na+ set point (SP) for each patient was calculated from three predialytic mid-week values. In the second phase, the “individualized phase”, patients had nine haemodialysis sessions with Na+ dialysate equal to their SP. Results: The mean age of the patients was 55.5 ± 12.1 years, with a male/female ratio of 1.3 and the most common cause of kidney disease was hypertension (47%). Mean predialytic serum Na+ concentration was 135.8 ± 1.9 mmol/L, with a mean intra-individual coefficient of variation of 2%. Mean interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) was 1.9 kg and 1.8 kg in the control and individualized phases, respectively (P = 0.75). A reduction in postdialytic systolic blood pressure (BP) was observed during the individualized phase (P = 0.04). A similar trend was noted in pre- and intradialytic BP but this was not statistically significant. Apart from headaches, which were more common in the individualized phase (P = 0.04), isonatraemic haemodialysis was well tolerated. Conclusions: IDWG as well as pre- and intradialytic BP were unaffected by isonatraemic haemodialysis. Postdialytic BP was significantly reduced. Introduction: Les objectifs de cette étude étaient d’évaluer l’impact de l’hémodialyse isonatrémique sur la réduction de la prise de poids inter-dialytique (PPID) et de la pression artérielle (PA) ainsi que sa tolérance dans notre population d’étude. Méthodes: Cet essai croisé a été mené au centre hospitalier universitaire Aristide Le Dantec de Dakar (Sénégal) chez des patients hémodialysés chroniques. Durant la première phase dite « phase contrôle », les patients ont eu neuf séances d’hémodialyse avec une concentration de sodium dans le dialysat (Na+ dialysat) de 138 mmol/L. Le set-point (SP) de la natrémie a été calculé pour chaque patient et correspondait à la moyenne de 3 natrémies pré-dialytiques en milieu de semaine. Durant la deuxième phase dite « phase individualisée », les patients ont eu neuf séances d’hémodialyse avec du Na+ dialysat égal à leur SP. Résultats: Trente-deux patients ont été inclus. L’âge moyen était de 55,5 ± 12,1 ans avec un ratio homme/femme de 1,3 et la néphropathie initiale la plus fréquente était l’hypertensive (47%). La natrémie pré-dialytique moyenne était de 135,8 ± 1,9 mmol/L, avec un coefficient de variation intra-individuel moyen de 2 %. La PPID moyenne était de 1,9 kg et 1,8 kg dans les phases de contrôle et individualisé, respectivement (P = 0,75). Une diminution de la PA systolique post-dialytique a été observée au cours de la phase individualisée (P = 0,04). Une tendance similaire sans significativité statistique a été notée sur les PA pré- et intra-dialytiques. Hormis les céphalées, plus fréquentes pendant la phase individualisée (P = 0,04), l’hémodialyse isonatrémique a été bien tolérée. Conclusions: La PPID, les PA pré- et intra-dialytiques n’ont pas été affectées par l’hémodialyse isonatrémique. La PA post-dialytique était significativement réduite

Evaluation de l’état hydrique chez les patients hémodialysés chroniques : une étude transversale monocentrique: Assessment of the hydration status in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center cross-sectional study

Context and objective. For many practitioners, blood pressure is the main indicator of the hydration status of the chronic hemodialysis patient. The objective of this study was to assess the extent to which bioimpedance analysis (BIA) can assist in determining acute changes in fluid volume during the hemodialysis session. Methods. This was a 9-week longitudinal study. The total body water (TBW) was measured with a BIA analyzer, before and after 6 successive sessions. The ΔWeight was compared to the ΔTBW by calculating the P/V ratio (ΔWeight/ΔTBW) with the assumption that the dry weight is reached when P/V = 1. Results. The measurements made in 22 patients (46.6 years, 54.5% men, 92.3 months on dialysis) were reproducible. There was no statistically significant difference between ΔTBW and ΔWeight. However, at the individual level, significant differences had been observed. Using hypertension as a marker for a state of hyperhydration, a 31.8% agreement was noted between the P/V ratio and hypertension. Conclusion. Although the loss of water predicted by the BIA did not always correspond to the weight loss, BIA is a technique that can be used to assess the variations in TBW during the hemodialysis session in patients. Contexte et objectif. La pression artérielle est pour de nombreux praticiens, l’indicateur principal du statut hydrique du patient hémodialysé chronique. L’objectif de la présente étude était d’évaluer dans quelle mesure l’analyse d’impédance bioélectrique (BIA) pourrait aider à la détermination des variations aigues du volume hydrique au cours de la séance d’hémodialyse. Méthodes. Il s’agissait d’une étude de suivi longitudinal sur 9 semaines. Le volume total d’eau (VTE) a été mesuré par BIA, avant et après 6 séances. Le ΔPoids a été comparé au ΔVTE par le calcul du ratio P/V (ΔPoids / ΔVTE) dans l’hypothèse que le poids sec est atteint lorsque P/V = 1. Résultats. Les mesures faites chez 22 patients (46,6 ans, 54,5% hommes, 92,3 mois en dialyse) étaient reproductibles. Il n’y avait pas de différence statistiquement significative entre le ΔVTE et le ΔPoids. Cependant à l’échelon individuel des différences importantes étaient observées. En utilisant l’hypertension artérielle (HTA) comme marqueur d’un état d’hyperhydratation, une concordance de 31,8% était notée entre le ratio P/V et l’HTA. Conclusion. Bien que la perte d’eau prédite par la BIA ne corresponde pas toujours à celle du poids, la BIA est une technique qui peut être utilisée pour évaluer les variations du VTE au cours de la séance d’hémodialys

Infection péritonéale à Géotrichum spp en dialyse péritonéale à propos d’un cas à Dakar avec revue de la littérature

Fungal peritoneal infection is a relatively rare but serious complication of peritoneal dialysis. It is associated with a high risk of technical failure and mortality, particularly in the event of late diagnosis. Most of these fungal infections are associated with the Candida genus. However, in recent years, we have observed an emergence of new fungal species with established pathogenicity in peritoneal dialysis. We report the first case of fungal peritoneal infection due to Geotrichum spp that occurred in our peritoneal dialysis unit in Dakar in Senegal.En dialyse péritonéale, l’infection péritonéale fongique est une complication relativement rare mais grave. Elle est associée à un risque élevé d’échec de la technique et de mortalité, en particulier en cas de diagnostic tardif. Ces infections fongiques sont dominées par le genre Candida. Cependant, au cours de ces dernières années, nous observons l’émergence de nouvelles espèces fongiques avec un pouvoir pathogène établi en dialyse péritonéale. Nous rapportons le premier cas d’infection péritonéale fongique à Géotrichum spp survenu au sein de notre unité de dialyse péritonéale à Dakar au Sénégal

Évaluation de la performance de la mesure conventionnelle et séquentielle de la pression artérielle en centre chez les patients en dialyse péritonéale à Dakar.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of conventional (CBPM) and sequential (SBPM) blood pressure measurements in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients using ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) as a reference. Patients and methods: Through a cross-sectional study including 17 patients followed in the PD unit of the Aristide Le Dantec Hospital, BP was measured by 3 methods: i) an automated measurement (OMRON M3 COMFORTTM) performed by a health care staff called CBPM; ii) the average of 5 automated measurements in an isolated patient in a cubicle called SBPM; iii) 24-hour ABPM with the CONTECTM device (Germany). High blood pressure was considered when the BP was higher than 130/80 mmHg at the 24-hour ABPM. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) was similar (p=0.28) between SBPM [AUC, 0.933; 95% CI, 0.813 – 1.000] and CBPM [AUC, 0.900; 95% CI, 0.752 – 1.000]. Regarding diastolic blood pressure (DBP), SBPM [AUC, 0.858; 95% CI, 0.638 – 1.000] was similar (p=1) to CBPM [AUC, 0.917; 95% CI, 0.753 – 1.000]. On Bland-Altman analysis, CBPM overestimated SBP by 11.65 mmHg and DBP by 3.94 mmHg. SBPM overestimated SBP by 6.2 mmHg and DBP by 4.35 mmHg. Conclusion: SBPM and CBPM are efficient in the diagnosis of ambulatory hypertension in PD patients in Dakar.Introduction : L’objectif de cette étude était d’évaluer les performances des mesures conventionnelles (MCPA) et séquentielles (MSPA) de la pression artérielle en prenant la MAPA comme référence. Patients et méthodes : A travers une étude transversale incluant 17 patients suivis dans l’unité de DP de l’Hôpital Aristide Le Dantec, la PA a été mesurée par 3 méthodes : i) une mesure automatisée (OMRON M3 COMFORT) effectué par un personnel de santé dite MCPA (OMRON M3 COMFORTTM) ; ii) la moyenne de 5 mesures automatisées chez un patient isolé dans un box dite MSPA ; iii) la MAPA des 24h avec l’appareil CONTECTM (Germany). L’HTA a été retenue devant une PA supérieure à 130/80 mmHg à la MAPA des 24h. Résultats : L’aire sous la courbe (AUC) de la PAS était similaire (p=0,28) entre la MSPA [AUC, 0,933 ; IC à 95 %, 0,813 – 1,000] et la MCPA [AUC, 0,900 ; IC à 95 %, 0,752 – 1,000]. Concernant la PAD, la MSPA [AUC, 0,858 ; IC à 95 %, 0,638 – 1,000] était similaire (p=1) à la MCPA [AUC, 0,917 ; IC à 95 %, 0,753 – 1,000]. À l’analyse de Bland-Altman, la MCPA surestimait  la PAS de 11,65 mmHg et la PAD de 3,94 mmHg. La MSPA quant à elle surestimait la PAS de 6,2 mmHg et la PAD de 4,35 mmHg. Conclusion : La MSPA et la MCPA sont performantes dans le diagnostic de l’HTA ambulatoire chez les patients en dialyse péritonéale à Dakar

Usefulness of foot-to-foot bioimpedance analysis for assessing volume status in chronic hemodialysis patients at the Aristide Le Dantec University Hospital (Senegal)

Introduction: Determination of dry weight is one of the daily goals to achieve in hemodialysis. The aim of this study was to validate the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in estimation of dry weight in a population of Senegalese chronic hemodialysis patients. Patients and methods: A 9-week cross-sectional study was carried out at the hemodialysis unit of Aristide Le Dantec University Hospital. Adult patients with no previous hospital history were included. The total body water (TBW) was measured with a single frequency bioelectric impedance foot-to-foot analyzer, before and after six successive hemodialysis sessions. These results were compared with those from clinical measurements with the Watson equation using a Student’s t-test and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: 264 measurements were made in 22 patients (46.6 years, 54.5% men, 92.3 months on dialysis, 62.7 kg mean dry weight). A significant reduction in weight (ΔWeight = 2.0 ± 1.1 kg; p < 0.0001) and in TBW measured by the BIA (ΔTBWBIA = 3.3 ± 1.0 liters; p < 0.0001)) or calculated by Watson’s equation (ΔTBWWatson = 0.5 ± 0.2 liter; p = 0.0001) was observed. There was a strong linear correlation and agreement between the 2 TBW measurements in pre-dialysis. In post-dialysis the concordance diagram indicated a bias = –2.2 and wide agreement limits. Conclusion: The BIA allows reproducible and reliable measurements and a fair estimate of the TBW in pre-dialysis