Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews: A method for conducting comprehensive analysis

A systematic review (SR) is a research method for synthesizing evidence on a specific topic. Among the various types of systematic reviews, there are SRs of guidelines (CPGs) and SRs of SRs. Traditionally, they are limited to just one type of secondary evidence. This paper introduces an innovative SR methodology that combines CPGs and SRs to improve evidence synthesis and overcome the limitations of isolated use.Essential steps that should always precede the actual research process include registering the research protocol, formulating research questions and setting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Using the PRISMA protocol for comprehensive database searches, it's crucial to combine keywords with boolean operators and remove duplicates. The eligibility of studies should be assessed by selecting potentially relevant articles through an initial screening of titles and abstracts, followed by a meticulous analysis of the full-texts. Rigorous evidence evaluation tools, such as AGREE II for CPGs and AMSTAR 2 for SRs, and the double reviewer approach ensure high-quality selections. Additionally, converting summarized results into percentages and applying statistical analyses facilitate interpretation and improve the reliability of rater assessments. A further characteristic of this methodology is its adaptability to the evolution of healthcare research

Integrated protocol for the prevention and treatment of skin ulcers in patients with end-stage renal disease

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is an escalating global health concern, affecting more than 10 % of the general population worldwide, amounting to over 800 million individuals. One of its major complications for patients is the high prevalence of skin ulcers . This study aims to develop a protocol for ulcer management within the context of a hospital-based dialysis center. The success of this strategy is deeply rooted in the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team, continually enriched by specialist training. The clinical nurse specialist (CNS) in wound care plays a pivotal role in this approach. By employing a systematic methodology, the protocol is tailored to emphasize holistic care for patients diagnosed with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis. It accentuates the significance of proactive prevention, in-depth patient education, and the immediate identification of early wound signs. The research underscores the necessity to further weave in specialized training for ulcer care, ensuring each hospital visit is maximized for efficiency and effectiveness. Central to this protocol is the understanding that CKD is a growing concern, that the optimal management of ulcers relies heavily on multidisciplinary collaboration, and that an emphasis on prevention, patient education, and timely wound recognition is crucial to enhance patient care and experience

A Comparative Evaluation of the Caloric Intake and Economic Efficiency of Two Types of Homogenized Diets in a Hospital Setting

The prevalence of malnutrition is increasing globally due to factors such as age-related pathological conditions and diseases that impact food and beverage intake. In hospital settings, older adult patients often require homogenised diets, which can lead to malnutrition due to poor palatability and limited variety. This study compared the Standard Homogenised Diet (HSD) and a Modified Homogenized Diet (HMD) proposed in a tertiary hospital in Northern Italy. A retrospective and observational design was used to analyse data from 86 adult patients with various conditions requiring a homogenised diet. The primary goal was to compare food intake, rheological characteristics, and palatability of the two diets. The secondary objective was to evaluate the economic impact by comparing costs and quantifying food waste from unused meals. Patients on HMD had a median daily caloric intake of 852 kcal (IQR 787–926 kcal) compared to 631 kcal (IQR 506–797 kcal) in the HSD group. Taste, texture, palatability, and ease of intake for HMD outperformed HSD with scores such as 3.7 ± 0.6 vs. 2.5 ± 0.4 for taste. Economically, HMD was EUR 0.53 less expensive per day than HSD, and food wastage costs were significantly lower for HMD (EUR 2.66 ± 0.81) than HSD (EUR 4.66 ± 1.27). Overall, HMD presented substantial benefits in patient satisfaction and cost-efficiency. This insight may aid diverse care settings to enhance meal acceptance and nutritional intake for patients needing homogenised diets