9 research outputs found

    Extensive modulation of a set of microRNAs in primary glioblastoma

    Full text link
    MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNA molecules playing regulatory roles in animals and plants by repressing translation or cleaving RNA transcripts. The specific modulation of several microRNAs has been recently associated to some forms of human cancer, suggesting that these short molecules may represent a new class of genes involved in oncogenesis. In our study, we examined by microarray the global expression levels of 245 microRNAs in glioblastoma multiforme, the most frequent and malignant of primary brain tumors. The analysis of both glioblastoma tissues and glioblastoma cell lines allowed us to identify a group of microRNAs whose expression is significantly altered in this tumor. The most interesting results came from miR-221, strongly up-regulated in glioblastoma and from a set of brain-enriched miRNAs, miR-128, miR-181a, miR-181b, and miR-181c, which are down-regulated in glioblastoma

    Extensive modulation of a set of microRNAs in primary glioblastoma

    Full text link
    MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNA molecules playing regulatory roles in animals and plants by repressing translation or cleaving RNA transcripts. The specific modulation of several microRNAs has been recently associated to some forms of human cancer, suggesting that these short molecules may represent a new class of genes involved in oncogenesis. In our study, we examined by microarray the global expression levels of 245 microRNAs in glioblastoma multiforme, the most frequent and malignant of primary brain tumors. The analysis of both glioblastoma tissues and glioblastoma cell lines allowed us to identify a group of microRNAs whose expression is significantly altered in this tumor. The most interesting results came from miR-221, strongly up-regulated in glioblastoma and from a set of brain-enriched miRNAs, miR-128, miR-181a, miR-181b, and miR-181c, which are down-regulated in glioblastoma

    Clinical target volume delineation in glioblastomas: pre-operative versus post-operative/pre-radiotherapy MRI.

    Full text link
    Delineation of clinical target volume (CTV) is still controversial in glioblastomas. In order to assess the differences in volume and shape of the radiotherapy target, the use of pre-operative versus post-operative/pre-radiotherapy T(1) and T(2) weighted MRI was compared. Four CTVs were delineated in 24 patients pre-operatively and post-operatively using T(1) contrast-enhanced (CTV_T1(PRE) and CTV_T1(POST)) and T(2) weighted images (CTV_T2(PRE) and CTV_T2(POST)). Pre-operative MRI examinations were performed the day before surgery, whereas post-operative examinations were acquired 1 month after surgery and before chemoradiation. A concordance index (CI) was defined as the ratio between the overlapping and composite volumes. The volumes of CTV_T1(PRE) and CTV_T1(POST) were not statistically different (248 \ub1 88 vs 254 \ub1 101), although volume differences >100 cm(3) were observed in 6 out of 24 patients. A marked increase due to tumour progression was shown in three patients. Three patients showed a decrease because of a reduced mass effect. A significant reduction occurred between pre-operative and post-operative T(2) volumes (139 \ub1 68 vs 78 \ub1 59). Lack of concordance was observed between CTV_T1(PRE) and CTV_T1(POST) (CI\u200a=\u200a0.67 \ub1 0.09), CTV_T2(PRE) and CTV_T2(POST) (CI\u200a=\u200a0.39 \ub1 0.20) and comparing the portion of the CTV_T1(PRE) and CTV_T1(POST) not covered by that defined on CTV_T2(PRE) images (CI\u200a=\u200a0.45 \ub1 0.16 and 0.44 \ub1 0.17, respectively). Using T(2) MRI, huge variations can be observed in peritumoural oedema, which are probably due to steroid treatment. Using T(1) MRI, brain shifts after surgery and possible progressive enhancing lesions produce substantial differences in CTVs. Our data support the use of post-operative/pre-radiotherapy T(1) weighted MRI for planning purposes

    FMRP modulates the Wnt signalling pathway in glioblastoma.

    Full text link
    Converging evidence indicates that the Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein (FMRP), which absent or mutated in Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), plays a role in many types of cancers. However, while FMRP roles in brain development and function have been extensively studied, its involvement in the biology of brain tumors remains largely unexplored. Here we show, in human glioblastoma (GBM) biopsies, that increased expression of FMRP directly correlates with a worse patient outcome. In contrast, reductions in FMRP correlate with a diminished tumor growth and proliferation of human GBM stem-like cells (GSCs) in vitro in a cell culture model and in vivo in mouse brain GSC xenografts. Consistently, increased FMRP levels promote GSC proliferation. To characterize the mechanism(s) by which FMRP regulates GSC proliferation, we performed GSC transcriptome analyses in GSCs expressing high levels of FMRP, and in these GSCs after knockdown of FMRP. We show that the WNT signalling is the most significantly enriched among the published FMRP target genes and genes involved in ASD. Consistently, we find that reductions in FMRP downregulate both the canonical WNT/β-Catenin and the non-canonical WNT-ERK1/2 signalling pathways, reducing the stability of several key transcription factors (i.e. β-Catenin, CREB and ETS1) previously implicated in the modulation of malignant features of glioma cells. Our findings support a key role for FMRP in GBM cancer progression, acting via regulation of WNT signalling

    The fragile X mental retardation protein regulates tumor invasiveness-related pathways in melanoma cells.

    Get PDF
    The fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is lacking or mutated in patients with the fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most frequent form of inherited intellectual disability. FMRP affects metastasis formation in a mouse model for breast cancer. Here we show that FMRP is overexpressed in human melanoma with high Breslow thickness and high Clark level. Furthermore, meta-analysis of the TCGA melanoma data revealed that high levels of FMRP expression correlate significantly with metastatic tumor tissues, risk of relapsing and disease-free survival. Reduction of FMRP in metastatic melanoma cell lines impinges on cell migration, invasion and adhesion. Next-generation sequencing in human melanoma cells revealed that FMRP regulates a large number of mRNAs involved in relevant processes of melanoma progression. Our findings suggest an association between FMRP levels and the invasive phenotype in melanoma and might open new avenues towards the discovery of novel therapeutic targets

    EPAC-lung: pooled analysis of circulating tumour cells in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

    Get PDF
    Introduction: We assessed the clinical validity of circulating tumour cell (CTC) quantification for prognostication of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by undertaking a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Methods: Nine European NSCLC CTC centres were asked to provide reported/unreported pseudo-anonymised data for patients with advanced NSCLC who participated in CellSearch CTC studies from January 2003 to March 2017. We used Cox regression models, stratified by centres, to establish the association between CTC count and survival. We assessed the added value of CTCs to prognostic clinicopathological models using likelihood ratio (LR) statistics and c-indices. Results: Seven out of nine eligible centres provided data for 550 patients with prognostic information for overall survival. CTC counts of >= 2 and >= 5 per 7.5 mL were associated with reduced progression-free survival (>= 2 CTCs: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.72, p = 5 CTCs: HR = 2.21, p 2 CTCs: HR = 2.18, p 5 CTCs: HR = 2.75, p = 2 CTCs p = 5 CTCs p Conclusions: These data confirm CTCs as an independent prognostic indicator of progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced NSCLC and also reveal some evidence of between-centre heterogeneity. CTC count improves prognostication when added to full clinicopathological predictive models. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd
    corecore