Impediment in upper airway stabilizing forces assessed by phrenic nerve stimulation in sleep apnea patients

BACKGROUND: The forces developed during inspiration play a key role in determining upper airway stability and the occurrence of nocturnal breathing disorders. Phrenic nerve stimulation applied during wakefulness is a unique tool to assess Upper airway dynamic properties and to measure the overall mechanical effects of the inspiratory process on UA stability. OBJECTIVES: To compare the flow/pressure responses to inspiratory and expiratory twitches between sleep apnea subjects and normal subjects. METHODS: Inspiratory and expiratory twitches using magnetic nerve stimulation completed in eleven untreated sleep apnea subjects and ten normal subjects. RESULTS: In both groups, higher flow and pressure were reached during inspiratory twitches. The two groups showed no differences in expiratory twitch parameters. During inspiration, the pressure at which flow-limitation occurred was more negative in normals than in apneic subjects, but not reaching significance (p = 0.07). The relationship between pharyngeal pressure and flow adequately fitted with a polynomial regression model providing a measurement of upper airway critical pressure during twitch. This pressure significantly decreased in normals from expiratory to inspiratory twitches (-11.1 ± 1.6 and -15.7 ± 1.0 cm H(2)O respectively, 95% CI 1.6–7.6, p < 0.01), with no significant difference between the two measurements in apneic subjects. The inspiratory/expiratory difference in critical pressure was significantly correlated with the frequency of nocturnal breathing disorders. CONCLUSION: Inspiratory-related upper airway dilating forces are impeded in sleep apnea patients

Reliability of home CPAP titration with different automatic CPAP devices

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>CPAP titration may be completed by automatic apparatus. However, differences in pressure behaviour could interfere with the reliability of pressure recommendations. Our objective was to compare pressure behaviour and effective pressure recommendations between three Automatic CPAP machines (Autoset Spirit, Remstar Auto, GK 420).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Sixteen untreated obstructive sleep apnea patients were randomly allocated to one of the 3 tested machines for a one-week home titration trial in a crossover design with a 10 days washout period between trials.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The median pressure value was significantly lower with machine GK 420 (5.9 +/- 1.8 cm H₂O) than with the other devices both after one night and one week of CPAP titration (7.4 +/- 1.3 and 6.6 +/- 1.9 cm H₂O). The maximal pressure obtained over the one-week titration was significantly higher with Remstar Auto (12.6 +/- 2.4 cm H₂O, Mean +/- SD) than with the two other ones (10.9 +/- 1.0 and 11.0 +/- 2.4 cm H₂O). The variance in pressure recommendation significantly differed between the three machines after one night and between Autoset Spirit and the two other machines after 1 week.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Pressure behaviour and pressure recommendation significantly differ between Auto CPAP machines both after one night and one week of home titration.</p

Changes in snoring characteristics after 30 days of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in patients with non-apnoeic snoring: a controlled trial.

BACKGROUND--A study was performed to evaluate the effect of discontinuation of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) treatment on snoring characteristics. METHODS--Eighteen non-apnoeic snoring subjects were randomly allocated to either a no treatment control group or an NCPAP treatment group. The control group was studied twice (baseline and day 30 of follow up). In the NCPAP group the level of NCPAP that abolished snoring was determined and part abolished snoring was determined and patients were placed on NCPAP every night for one month. A sleep study was performed on the first night without NCPAP after completing 30 days of treatment (follow up 1). A fourth polysomnographic study was performed 8-10 days after NCPAP was stopped (follow up 2) in six subjects. RESULTS--In both groups total sleep time (TST) and sleep architecture remained unchanged at the different visits. Baseline snoring characteristics in the two groups were similar. In the control group the mean (SE) number of snoring episodes/hour of sleep (snoring index) and the percentage of TST > 60 decibels (dB) were 380 (36)/h and 11.1 (2.0)% TST respectively at baseline, and was unchanged at follow up. In the NCPAP group the snoring index decreased from 387 (50)/h to 320 (57)/h after NCPAP therapy, but the % TSTS > 60 dB decreased from 10.3 (1.8)% to 7.4 (1.5)%. The snoring index and intensity returned to baseline values at follow up 2 (374 (74)/h, 9.8 (2.1)% TST). Changes in snoring characteristics could not be explained by changes in body position between the different sleep studies. CONCLUSIONS--NCPAP improves snoring but this effect is lost soon after stopping treatment