Chronic lymphocytic leukemia therapy guided by measurable residual disease

Background:Ibrutinib (I) and venetoclax (V) improve chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) outcomes compared to chemo-immunotherapy. We hypothesized I+V is more effective than fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR), and personalizing treatment duration, using measurable residual disease (MRD), would optimize outcomes.Methods:FLAIR, a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label platform trial for untreated CLL, compared I+V and I, to FCR. In I+V, after 2m I, V was added for up to 6y of therapy. The duration of I+V was defined by MRD assessed in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) and was double the time to undetectable MRD (uMRD). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival for I+V vs FCR, reported herein. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival, response, MRD and safety. Results:523 participants were randomized to FCR or I+V. At median 43.7m, there were 87 progressions (75 FCR, 12 I+V). The hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival for I+V vs FCR is 0.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.24; P&lt;0.0001). There were 34 deaths (25 FCR, 9 I+V). The HR for overall survival for I+V vs FCR is 0.31 (95%CI, 0.15-0.67). At 3y, 58.0% I+V participants stopped therapy due to uMRD. After 5y of I+V, 65.9% and 92.7% participants were BM and PB uMRD, respectively. Infection rates were similar. There were more cardiovascular events with I+V (10.7%) vs FCR (0.4%). Conclusion:MRD-directed I+V improved progression-free survival and favored overall survival compared to FCR. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; Trial Registration number: ISRCTN01844152 and EudraCT, 2013-001944-76.) <br/

Outcomes of anti-CD38 isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in five relapsed myeloma patients with prior exposure to anti-C38 daratumumab: case series

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Taylor & Francis and International Society of Hematology. This is an open access article available under a Creative Commons licence. The published version can be accessed at the following link on the publisher’s website: https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2022.2028978Objectives: Daratumumab is the first anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (Mab) used to treat myeloma in the newly diagnosed setting and in the relapsed setting. Isatuximab, another Mab targeting a specific epitope on the CD38 receptor, was recently approved in the UK in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (IsaPomDex) to treat myeloma patients who received three prior lines of therapy. However, there is a lack of understanding of whether using a prior anti-CD38 Mab (e.g. daratumumab) can affect the efficacy of another Mab (e.g. isatuximab), when the latter is used to treat a subsequent relapse.Methods: We performed a UK-wide outcomes study of IsaPomDex in the real-world. In this case series, we report a detailed descriptive analysis of the characteristics and clinical outcomes of five IsaPomDex patients in UK routine practice (Patients I to V), with a prior exposure to daratumumab.Results: Age range was 51-77 years with two patients >70 and three patients <70 years. The cytogenetic risk was standard in two patients, high in two patients and not known in one patient. Prior daratumumab regimen were monotherapy (dara-mono) in one patient (II), and daratumumab with bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd) in four patients. Responses to prior daratumumab were: very good partial response (VGPR) in two patients (I and III), minor response-stable disease (MR-SD) in one patient (II), and progressive disease (PD) in two patients (IV and V). Median (range) number of IsaPomDex cycles received was 2 (1-4). Outcomes of IsaPomDex were PD in three patients (II, IV and V) and a response in two patients. Response categories were: MR-SD in patient I and PR in patient III.Discussion: Despite the limitations of our case series, we described the first UK real-world report of IsaPomDex outcomes in myeloma patients with a prior exposure to daratumumab.Conclusion: Large prospective studies are required to further evaluate myeloma outcomes in this setting.Published versio

A Phase 2a cohort expansion study to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of CXD101 in patients with advanced solid-organ cancer expressing HR23B or lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: This Phase 2a dose expansion study was performed to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the maximum tolerated dose of the oral histone de-acetylase (HDAC) inhibitor CXD101 in patients with relapsed / refractory lymphoma or advanced solid organ cancers and to assess HR23B protein expression by immunohistochemistry as a biomarker of HDAC inhibitor sensitivity. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid-organ cancers with high HR23B expression or lymphomas received CXD101 at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Key exclusions: corrected QT > 450 ms, neutrophils  1. Baseline HR23B expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients enrolled between March 2014 and September 2019, 47 received CXD101 (19 solid-organ cancer, 28 lymphoma). Thirty-four patients received ≥80% RP2D. Baseline characteristics: median age 57.4 years, median prior lines 3, male sex 57%. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (32%), thrombocytopenia (17%), anaemia (13%), and fatigue (9%) with no deaths on CXD101. No responses were seen in solid-organ cancers, with disease stabilisation in 36% or patients; the overall response rate in lymphoma was 17% with disease stabilisation in 52% of patients. Median progression-free survival was 1.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-5.4) in solid-organ cancers and 2.6 months (95%CI 1.2-5.6) in lymphomas. HR23B status did not predict response. CONCLUSIONS: CXD101 showed acceptable tolerability with efficacy seen in Hodgkin lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma. Further studies assessing combination approaches are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01977638 . Registered 07 November 2013

Outcome of COVID-19 in Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma-Report From the European MCL Registry

Data on outcome of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and COVID-19 infection are limited. The European MCL (EMCL) registry is a centralized registry of the EMCL network, collecting real-world information about treatments and disease courses. During the COVID-19 pandemic, additional data on MCL patients with COVID-19 infection were collected, aiming to identify risk factors for mortality from COVID-19. In our retrospective, multicenter, international study, we collected data from 63 MCL patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 44–84) in 9 countries with evidence of a COVID-19 infection between February 2020 and October 2021. The overall mortality rate was high (44.4%), especially in hospitalized patients (61%) and in patients with need for intensive care unit care (94%). Patients receiving rituximab had significantly poorer survival than patients not receiving rituximab (P = 0.04). Our data highlight the importance of prevention strategies and underline the need for effective vaccination in this vulnerable cohort

Pirtobrutinib <i>versus</i> venetoclax in covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor-pretreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Venetoclax is a standard treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) following covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) therapy, despite relatively limited prospective data in this setting. Pirtobrutinib is a highly selective, non-covalent (reversible) BTKi that was designed to overcome the pharmacologic limitations of cBTKi and re-establish BTK inhibition. An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to estimate the treatment effect of pirtobrutinib versus venetoclax monotherapy in patients with cBTKi-pretreated CLL. Data from patients with CLL who were venetoclax-naïve and pretreated with cBTKi received pirtobrutinib (N=146) in the phase I/II BRUIN study were compared with the only identified trial of patients with CLL receiving venetoclax after a cBTKi (N=91), as administered as monotherapy until progression. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-emergent adverse events. Both unweighted and weighted analyses were conducted. PFS and OS of pirtobrutinib and venetoclax were comparable in both unweighted and weighted analyses (weighted hazard ratios for PFS: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-1.73, P=0.98 and OS: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.25-1.67, P=0.34). ORR was significantly higher for pirtobrutinib (80.2% vs. 64.8%, P=0.01). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were lower in weighted analyses for pirtobrutinib versus venetoclax (all P<0.01), except for pneumonia, which was similar. These results suggest that pirtobrutinib may also be considered as an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with relapsed CLL following cBTKi

Immunogenicity of COVID ‐19 vaccines in patients with follicular lymphoma receiving frontline chemoimmunotherapy

Summary: Immune responses to primary COVID‐19 vaccination were investigated in 58 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) as part of the PETReA trial of frontline therapy (EudraCT 2016–004010‐10). COVID‐19 vaccines (BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1) were administered before, during or after cytoreductive treatment comprising rituximab (depletes B cells) and either bendamustine (depletes CD4+ T cells) or cyclophosphamide‐based chemotherapy. Blood samples obtained after vaccine doses 1 and 2 (V1, V2) were analysed for antibodies and T cells reactive to the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein using the Abbott Architect and interferon‐gamma ELISpot assays respectively. Compared to 149 healthy controls, patients with FL exhibited lower antibody but preserved T‐cell responses. Within the FL cohort, multivariable analysis identified low pre‐treatment serum IgA levels and V2 administration during induction or maintenance treatment as independent determinants of lower antibody and higher T‐cell responses, and bendamustine and high/intermediate FLIPI‐2 score as additional determinants of a lower antibody response. Several clinical scenarios were identified where dichotomous immune responses were estimated with >95% confidence based on combinations of predictive variables. In conclusion, the immunogenicity of COVID‐19 vaccines in FL patients is influenced by multiple disease‐ and treatment‐related factors, among which B‐cell depletion showed differential effects on antibody and T‐cell responses