International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has been the traditional method for assessing glycemic control. However, it does not reflect intra- and interday glycemic excursions that may lead to acute events (such as hypoglycemia) or postprandial hyperglycemia, which have been linked to both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), either from real-time use (rtCGM) or intermittently viewed (iCGM), addresses many of the limitations inherent in HbA1c testing and self-monitoring of blood glucose. Although both provide the means to move beyond the HbA1c measurement as the sole marker of glycemic control, standardized metrics for analyzing CGM data are lacking. Moreover, clear criteria for matching people with diabetes to the most appropriate glucose monitoring methodologies, as well as standardized advice about how best to use the new information they provide, have yet to be established. In February 2017, the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD) Congress convened an international panel of physicians, researchers, and individuals with diabetes who are expert in CGM technologies to address these issues. This article summarizes the ATTD consensus recommendations and represents the current understanding of how CGM results can affect outcomes

Embedded Control in Wearable Medical Devices: Application to the Artificial Pancreas

Significant increases in processing power, coupled with the miniaturization of processing units operating at low power levels, has motivated the embedding of modern control systems into medical devices. The design of such embedded decision-making strategies for medical applications is driven by multiple crucial factors, such as: (i) guaranteed safety in the presence of exogenous disturbances and unexpected system failures; (ii) constraints on computing resources; (iii) portability and longevity in terms of size and power consumption; and (iv) constraints on manufacturing and maintenance costs. Embedded control systems are especially compelling in the context of modern artificial pancreas systems (AP) used in glucose regulation for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Herein, a review of potential embedded control strategies that can be leveraged in a fully-automated and portable AP is presented. Amongst competing controllers, emphasis is provided on model predictive control (MPC), since it has been established as a very promising control strategy for glucose regulation using the AP. Challenges involved in the design, implementation and validation of safety-critical embedded model predictive controllers for the AP application are discussed in detail. Additionally, the computational expenditure inherent to MPC strategies is investigated, and a comparative study of runtime performances and storage requirements among modern quadratic programming solvers is reported for a desktop environment and a prototype hardware platform

The artificial pancreas: current status and future prospects in the management of diabetes

Recent advances in insulins, insulin pumps, continuous glucose‐monitoring systems, and control algorithms have resulted in an acceleration of progress in the development of artificial pancreas devices. This review discusses progress in the development of external systems that are based on subcutaneous drug delivery and subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring. There are two major system‐level approaches to achieving closed‐loop control of blood glucose in diabetic individuals. The unihormonal approach uses insulin to reduce blood glucose and relies on complex safety mitigation algorithms to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. The bihormonal approach uses both insulin to lower blood glucose and glucagon to raise blood glucose, and also relies on complex algorithms to provide for safety of the user. There are several major strategies for the design of control algorithms and supervision control for application to the artificial pancreas: proportional–integral–derivative, model predictive control, fuzzy logic, and safety supervision designs. Advances in artificial pancreas research in the first decade of this century were based on the ongoing computer revolution and miniaturization of electronic technology. The advent of modern smartphones has created the ability to utilize smartphone technology as the engineering centerpiece of an artificial pancreas. With these advances, an artificial or bionic pancreas is within reach

Dynamic insulin on board: Incorporation of circadian insulin sensitivity variation

BACKGROUND: Insulin-on-board (IOB) estimation is used in modern insulin therapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) as well as different automatic glucose-regulating strategies (i.e., artificial pancreas products) to prevent insulin stacking that may lead to hypoglycemia. However, most of the IOB calculations are static IOB (sIOB): they are based only on approximated insulin decay and do not take into account diurnal changes in insulin sensitivity. METHODS: A dynamic IOB (dIOB) that takes into account diurnal insulin sensitivity variation is suggested in this work and used to adjust the sIOB estimations. The dIOB function is used to correct the dosage of insulin boluses in light of this circadian variation. RESULTS: Basal–bolus as applied by pump users and model predictive control therapy with and without dIOB were evaluated using the University of Virginia/Padova metabolic simulator. Three protocols with four meals of 1 g carbohydrate/kg body weight were evaluated: a nominal scenario and two robustness scenarios, one in which insulin sensitivity was 15% greater than estimated and the other where the lunch is 30% less than announced. In the nominal and robustness scenarios, respectively, the dIOB led to 6% and 24% and 40% less hypoglycemia episodes than approaches without IOB. The new approach was also compared with the sIOB to evaluate the improvements with respect to the previous approach. CONCLUSIONS: Improved glucose regulation was demonstrated using the dIOB where circadian insulin sensitivity is used to adjust IOB estimation. Use of diurnal variations of insulin sensitivity appears to promote effective and safe insulin therapy using CSII or artificial pancreas. Clinical trials are warranted to determine whether nocturnal hypoglycemia can be reduced using the dIOB approach