Association between time to reperfusion and echocardiography assessed left ventricular filling pressure in patients with first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention

  Background: Diastolic dysfunction and elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure fol­lowing acute myocardial infarction are associated with adverse outcomes. Although time to reperfusion is a powerful prognostic marker following acute myocardial infarction, little is known about its impact on diastolic function and LV filling pressure. We hypothesized that delayed time to reperfusion will be associated with worse diastolic function. Methods: This study included 180 consecutive patients with first ST elevation myocardial in­farction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). They presen­ted of chest pain within 24 h and underwent echocardiography within 3 days of primary PCI. Results: Median time to reperfusion, defined as the time from symptom onset to reperfusion at the end of primary PCI, was 185 min (interquartile range 120–660). Patients with reperfu­sion time > 185 min (n = 92) had a significantly higher E/septal e’ (13.3 ± 5.0 vs. 9.7 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) and E/lateral e’ (9.8 ± 3.5 vs. 7.8 ± 2.2, p < 0.001) ratios, and more advanced diastolic grade (p < 0.001) compared to those having early reperfusion (n = 88). There were no significant differences in LV ejection fraction and left atrial volume between the two groups. Time to reperfusion was an independent predictor of early E/average e’ ratio. The adverse ef­fect of late reperfusion on diastolic dysfunction was more prominent in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. Conclusions: Longer time to reperfusion is associated with early elevated LV diastolic pres­sure in primary PCI-treated patients with STEMI.

Elimination of Transcoarctation Pressure Gradients Has No Impact on Left Ventricular Function or Aortic Shear Stress After Intervention in Patients With Mild Coarctation

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the impact of transcatheter intervention on left ventricular function and aortic hemodynamics in patients with mild coarctation of the aorta (COA). Background: The optimal method and timing of transcatheter intervention for COA remains unclear, especially when the severity of COA is mild (peak-to-peak transcoarctation pressure gradient  < 20 mm Hg). Debate rages regarding the risk/benefit ratio of intervention versus long-term effects of persistent minimal gradient in this heterogeneous population with differing blood pressures, ventricular function, and peripheral perfusion. Methods: We developed a unique computational fluid dynamics and lumped parameter modeling framework based on patient-specific hemodynamic input parameters and validated it against patient-specific clinical outcomes (before and after intervention). We used clinically measured hemodynamic metrics and imaging of the aorta and the left ventricle in 34 patients with mild COA to make these correlations. Results: Despite dramatic reduction in the transcoarctation pressure gradient (catheter and Doppler echocardiography pressure gradients reduced by 75% and 47.3%, respectively), there was only modest effect on aortic flow and no significant impact on aortic shear stress (the maximum time-averaged wall shear stress in descending aorta was reduced 5.1%). In no patient did transcatheter intervention improve left ventricular function (e.g., stroke work and normalized stroke work were reduced by only 4.48% and 3.9%, respectively). Conclusions: Transcatheter intervention that successfully relieves mild COA pressure gradients does not translate to decreased myocardial strain. The effects of the intervention were determined to the greatest degree by ventricular–vascular coupling hemodynamics and provide a novel valuable mechanism to evaluate patients with COA that may influence clinical practice. Key Words: aortic hemodynamics, left ventricle function, mild coarctation, peak-to-peak pressure gradient, transcatheter interventionNational Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) (R01 GM 49039)American Heart Association (Postdoctoral Fellowship 16POST26420039

Mixed Valvular Disease Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Quantification and Systematic Differentiation Using Clinical Measurements and Image-Based Patient‐Specific In Silico Modeling

Background: Mixed valvular disease (MVD), mitral regurgitation (MR) from pre‐existing disease in conjunction with paravalvular leak (PVL) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), is one of the most important stimuli for left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, associated with cardiac mortality. Despite the prevalence of MVD, the quantitative understanding of the interplay between pre‐existing MVD, PVL, LV, and post‐TAVR recovery is meager. Methods and Results: We quantified the effects of MVD on valvular‐ventricular hemodynamics using an image‐based patient‐specific computational framework in 72 MVD patients. Doppler pressure was reduced by TAVR (mean, 77%; N=72; P<0.05), but it was not always accompanied by improvements in LV workload. TAVR had no effect on LV workload in 22 patients, and LV workload post‐TAVR significantly rose in 32 other patients. TAVR reduced LV workload in only 18 patients (25%). PVL significantly alters LV flow and increases shear stress on transcatheter aortic valve leaflets. It interacts with mitral inflow and elevates shear stresses on mitral valve and is one of the main contributors in worsening of MR post‐TAVR. MR worsened in 32 patients post‐TAVR and did not improve in 18 other patients. Conclusions: PVL limits the benefit of TAVR by increasing LV load and worsening of MR and heart failure. Post‐TAVR, most MVD patients (75% of N=72; P<0.05) showed no improvements or even worsening of LV workload, whereas the majority of patients with PVL, but without that pre‐existing MR condition (60% of N=48; P<0.05), showed improvements in LV workload. MR and its exacerbation by PVL may hinder the success of TAVR

Mixed Valvular Disease Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Quantification and Systematic Differentiation Using Clinical Measurements and Image-Based Patient‐Specific In Silico Modeling

Background: Mixed valvular disease (MVD), mitral regurgitation (MR) from pre‐existing disease in conjunction with paravalvular leak (PVL) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), is one of the most important stimuli for left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, associated with cardiac mortality. Despite the prevalence of MVD, the quantitative understanding of the interplay between pre‐existing MVD, PVL, LV, and post‐TAVR recovery is meager. Methods and Results: We quantified the effects of MVD on valvular‐ventricular hemodynamics using an image‐based patient‐specific computational framework in 72 MVD patients. Doppler pressure was reduced by TAVR (mean, 77%; N=72; P<0.05), but it was not always accompanied by improvements in LV workload. TAVR had no effect on LV workload in 22 patients, and LV workload post‐TAVR significantly rose in 32 other patients. TAVR reduced LV workload in only 18 patients (25%). PVL significantly alters LV flow and increases shear stress on transcatheter aortic valve leaflets. It interacts with mitral inflow and elevates shear stresses on mitral valve and is one of the main contributors in worsening of MR post‐TAVR. MR worsened in 32 patients post‐TAVR and did not improve in 18 other patients. Conclusions: PVL limits the benefit of TAVR by increasing LV load and worsening of MR and heart failure. Post‐TAVR, most MVD patients (75% of N=72; P<0.05) showed no improvements or even worsening of LV workload, whereas the majority of patients with PVL, but without that pre‐existing MR condition (60% of N=48; P<0.05), showed improvements in LV workload. MR and its exacerbation by PVL may hinder the success of TAVR

A mechanical approach for smooth surface fitting to delineate vessel walls in optical coherence tomography images

Automated analysis of vascular imaging techniques is limited by the inability to precisely determine arterial borders. Intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers unprecedented detail of artery wall structure and composition, but does not provide consistent visibility of the outer border of the vessel due to the limited penetration depth. Existing interpolation and surface fitting methods prove insufficient to accurately fill the gaps between the irregularly spaced and sometimes unreliably identified visible segments of the vessel outer border. This paper describes an intuitive, efficient, and flexible new method of 3D surface fitting and smoothing suitable for this task. An anisotropic linear-elastic mesh is fit to irregularly spaced and uncertain data points corresponding to visible segments of vessel borders, enabling the fully automated delineation of the entire inner and outer borders of diseased vessels in OCT images for the first time. In a clinical dataset, the proposed smooth surface fitting approach had great agreement when compared with human annotations: areas differed by just 11 ± 11% (0.93 ± 0.84 mm2), with a coefficient of determination of 0.89. Overlapping and non-overlapping area ratios were 0.91 and 0.18, respectively, with a sensitivity of 90.8 and specificity of 99.0. This spring mesh method of contour fitting significantly outperformed all alternative surface fitting and interpolation approaches tested. The application of this promising proposed method is expected to enhance clinical intervention and translational research using OCT.U.S. National Institutes of Health (Grant GM 49039)