Initial and sustained brain responses to contextual conditioned anxiety in humans

AbstractContextual fear conditioning takes place if the occurrence of threat cannot be predicted by specific cues. As a consequence the context becomes the best predictor of the threat and later induces anxiety (sustained fear response). Previous studies suggest that both the amygdala and the hippocampus are crucial for contextual fear conditioning. First, we wanted to further elucidate the neuronal correlates of long-lasting contextual threat within a highly ecologically setting created in virtual reality (VR). Second, we wanted to distinguish between initial and sustained components of the anxiety response to a threatening situation. Twenty-four participants were guided through two virtual offices for 30s each. They received unpredictable electric stimuli (unconditioned stimulus, US) in one office (anxiety context, CXT+), but never in the second office (safety context, CXT−). Successful contextual fear conditioning was indexed by higher anxiety and enhanced US-expectancy ratings for CXT+ versus CXT−. Initial neural activity was assessed by modeling the onsets of both contexts, and sustained neural activity by considering the entire context duration (contrasts: CXT+ > CXT−). Amygdala and hippocampus revealed sustained activity. Initial and sustained activities were found in the middle temporal gyrus, and primary motor cortex (M1). Additional initial activity was obvious in orbitofrontal (OFC), dorsomedial (dmPFC), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). These results suggest that entering a threatening context initially induces conditioned fear reactions (M1), recall of contingency awareness (dlPFC), and explicit threat appraisal (dmPFC, OFC). While remaining in the threatening context might involve anxiety-like conditioned responses (amygdala, M1) and the generation of a spatial map to predict where and when a threatening event may occur (hippocampus). We conclude that in humans initial versus sustained anxiety responses triggered by a threat associated context are associated with distinguishable brain activation patterns involving a fear network and a “contingency-cognitive” network, respectively

GLRB allelic variation associated with agoraphobic cognitions, increased startle response and fear network activation : a potential neurogenetic pathway to panic disorder

The molecular genetics of panic disorder (PD) with and without agoraphobia (AG) are still largely unknown and progress is hampered by small sample sizes. We therefore performed a genome-wide association study with a dimensional, PD/AG - related anxiety phenotype based on the Agoraphobia Cognition Questionnaire (ACQ) in a sample of 1,370 healthy German volunteers of the CRC TRR58 MEGA study wave 1. A genome-wide significant association was found between ACQ and single non-coding nucleotide variants of the GLRB gene (rs78726293, p=3.3x10-8; rs191260602, p=3.9x10-8). We followed up on this finding in a larger dimensional ACQ sample (N=2,547) and in independent samples with a dichotomous AG phenotype based on the Symptoms Checklist (SCL-90; N=3,845) and a case control sample with the categorical phenotype PD/AG (Ncombined =1,012) obtaining highly significant p-values also for GLRB single nucleotide variants rs17035816 (p=3.8x10-4) and rs7688285 (p=7.6x10-5). GLRB gene expression was found to be modulated by rs7688285 in brain tissue as well as cell culture. Analyses of intermediate PD/AG phenotypes demonstrated increased startle reflex and increased fear network as well as general sensory activation by GLRB risk gene variants rs78726293, rs191260602, rs17035816 and rs7688285. Partial Glrb knockout-mice demonstrated an agoraphobic phenotype. In conjunction withthe clinical observation that rare coding GLRB gene mutations are associated with the neurological disorder hyperekplexia characterized by a generalized startle reaction and agoraphobic behavior, our data provide evidence that non-coding, though functional GLRB gene polymorphisms may predispose to PD by increasing startle response and agoraphobic cognitions.PostprintPeer reviewe

Kontextuelle Furchtkonditionierung beim Menschen: die Wiederkehr von Kontextangst und der Einfluss von genetischen Polymorphismen

Als Angst bezeichnet man einen nicht auf spezifische Objekte gerichteten länger anhaltenden zukunfts-orientierten Zustand der Besorgnis. Diese ist kennzeichnend für Angststörungen wie Panikstörung, generalisierte Angststörung und Posttraumatische Belastungsstörung (PTBS). Experimentell kann Angst durch kontextuelle Furchtkonditionierung ausgelöst werden. Bei dieser Art der Konditionierung werden aversive Ereignisse als unvorhersehbar erlebt, wodurch der gesamte Kontext mit der Gefahr assoziiert wird. Diese Arbeit hat zum Ziel, Mechanismen der Entstehung und Aufrechterhaltung von Kontextangst zu untersuchen. Dies sind zum einem erleichterte Akquisition von Kontextkonditionierungen und deren fehlerhafte Extinktion. Hier ist vor allem die Fragestellung relevant, wie dies durch genetische Varianten moduliert wird (Studie 1). Zum anderen soll die Wiederkehr der Angst nach der Extinktion mit einem neuen Reinstatement-Paradigma untersucht werden (Studie 2). Zur Untersuchung dieser Forschungsfragen wurden zwei kontextuelle Furchtkonditionierungsstudien in virtueller Realität (VR) durchgeführt. Während der Akquisition wurden leicht schmerzhafte elektrische Reize (unkonditionierter Stimulus, US) unvorhersehbar präsentiert, während die Probanden in einem virtuellen Büroraum waren. Dadurch wurde dieser Raum zum Angstkontext (CXT+). Ein zweiter Büroraum wurde nie mit dem US gepaart, deshalb wurde dieser Raum zum Sicherheitskontext (CXT-). Die Extinktion, in der die Kontexte ohne US präsentiert wurden, fand 24 h später statt, und ein Test zum Abruf der Extinktion bzw. zur Wiederkehr der Angst nochmals 24 h später. In beiden Studien wurde die Angst auf drei verschiedenen Ebenen gemessen: Verhalten (angstpotenzierter Schreckreflex), Physiologie (tonische Hautleitfähigkeit), und verbale Ebene (explizite Ratings). Die Probanden für Studie 1 wurden anhand der 5-HTTLPR (S+ Risikoallel vs. LL nicht-Risikoallel) und NPSR1 rs324981 (T+ Risikoallel vs. AA nicht-Risikoallel) Polymorphismen stratifiziert, sodass vier kombinierte Genotyp Gruppen (S+/T+, S+/LL, LL/T+ und LL/AA) mit je 20 Probanden vorlagen. Es zeigte sich, dass der angstpotenzierte Schreckreflex durch die Interaktion zwischen beiden genetischen Polymorphismen moduliert wurde. Nur Träger beider Risikoallele (S+ Träger des 5-HTTLPR und T+ Träger des NPSR1 Polymorphismus) zeigten einen höheren Schreckreflex im CXT+ als im CXT- während der Akquisition. Der Abruf der Extinktion an Tag 3, gemessen anhand des Schreckreflexes, wurde allerdings nicht durch die Genotypen moduliert. Interessanterweise zeigte sich auf dem expliziten Angstlevel (Valenz- und Angstratings) nur ein Einfluss des NPSR1 Polymorphismus, und zwar bewerteten die nicht-Risikoallel Träger (AA) den CXT+ mit negativerer Valenz und höherer Angst im Vergleich zum CXT-; die Risikoallel Träger (T+) taten dies nicht. In der zweiten Studie wurde fast das gleiche Paradigma benutzt wie in der ersten Studie mit der Ausnahme, dass eine Versuchsgruppe (Reinstatementgruppe) den US noch einmal am Anfang des dritten Untersuchungstages vor der Präsentation von CXT+ und CXT- appliziert bekam. Die zweite Versuchsgruppe (Kontrollgruppe) erhielt keinen US, sondern wurde direkt durch CXT+ und CXT- geführt. Es zeigte sich, dass nur in der Reinstatementgruppe die Angst auf impliziter und expliziter Ebene wiederkehrte, d.h. die Probanden zeigten einen höheren Schreckreflex und höhere Angstratings auf den CXT+ im Vergleich zum CXT-. Wichtig war vor allem, dass die Wiederkehr der Angst in der Reinstatementgruppe mit der Veränderung der Zustandsangst und der Stimmung (von der Extinktion zum Test) korrelierte. D.h. je größer die Angst und je negativer die Stimmung wurden, desto höher war die Wiederkehr der Angst. Zusammengefasst belegt Studie 1, dass erleichterte kontextuelle Furchtkonditionierung auf impliziter Ebene (Schreckreflex) ein Endophänotyp für Angststörungen sein könnte, was zu unserem Verständnis der Ätiologie von Angststörungen beitragen könnte. Die Ergebnisse der zweiten Studie legen nahe, dass eine ängstliche und negative Stimmung nach der Extinktion die Rückkehr von Angst begünstigen könnte. Darüber hinaus scheint das VR-basierte kontextuelle Furchtkonditionierungsparadigma ein geeignetes Mittel zu sein, um Mechanismen der Angstentstehung und Angstwiederkehr experimentell zu erforschen. Weiterführende Studien könnten nun auch Angstpatienten untersuchen und das Paradigma auf evolutionär-relevante Kontexte (z.B. Höhe, Dunkelheit, weite Plätze) ausweiten.Sustained anxiety is considered as a chronic and future-oriented state of apprehension that does not belong to a specific object. It is discussed as an important characteristic of anxiety disorders including panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Experimentally, sustained anxiety can be induced by contextual fear conditioning in which aversive events are unpredictably presented and therefore the whole context becomes associated with the threat. This thesis aimed at investigating important mechanisms in the development and maintenance of sustained anxiety: (1) facilitated acquisition and resistant extinction of contextual anxiety due to genetic risk factors (Study 1), and (2) the return of contextual anxiety after successful extinction using a new reinstatement paradigm (Study 2). To this end, two contextual fear conditioning studies were conducted in virtual reality (VR). During acquisition one virtual office was paired with unpredictable mildly painful electric stimuli (unconditioned stimulus, US), thus becoming the anxiety context (CXT+). Another virtual office was never paired with any US, thus becoming the safety context (CXT-). Extinction was conducted 24 h later, i.e. no US was presented, and extinction recall was tested another 24 h later on Day 3. In both studies context-evoked anxiety was measured on three different response levels: behavioral (anxiety-potentiated startle reflex), physiological (skin conductance level), and verbal (explicit ratings). In Study 1, participants were stratified for 5-HTTLPR (S+ risk allele vs. LL no risk allele) and NPSR1 rs324981 (T+ risk allele vs. AA no risk allele) polymorphisms, resulting in four combined genotype groups with 20 participants each: S+/T+, S+/LL, LL/T+, and LL/AA. Results showed that acquisition of anxiety-potentiated startle was influenced by a gene × gene interaction: only carriers of both risk alleles (S+ carriers of the 5-HTTLPR and T+ carriers of the NPSR1 polymorphism) exhibited significantly higher startle magnitudes in CXT+ compared to CXT-. However, extinction recall as measured with anxiety-potentiated startle was not affected by any genotype. Interestingly, the explicit anxiety level, i.e. valence and anxiety ratings, was only influenced by the NPSR1 genotype, in a way that no risk allele carriers (AA) reported higher anxiety and more negative valence in response to CXT+ compared to CXT-, whereas risk allele carriers (T+) did not. Study 2 adopted nearly the same paradigm with the modification that one group (reinstatement group) received one unsignaled US at the beginning of the experimental session on Day 3 before seeing CXT+ and CXT-. The second group served as a control group and received no US, but was immediately exposed to CXT+ and CXT-. Results showed a return of anxiety on the implicit and explicit level (higher startle responses and anxiety ratings in response to CXT+ compared to CXT-) in the reinstatement group only. Most important, the return of contextual anxiety in the reinstatement group was associated with a change of state anxiety and mood from extinction to test, that is the more anxiety and negative mood participants experienced before the reinstatement procedure, the higher their return of anxiety was. In sum, results of Study 1 showed that facilitated contextual fear conditioning on an implicit behavioral level (startle response) could be regarded as an endophenotype for anxiety disorders, which can contribute to our understanding of the etiology of anxiety disorders. Results of Study 2 imply that anxiety and negative mood after extinction could be an important facilitator for the return of anxiety. Furthermore, the present VR-based contextual fear conditioning paradigm seems to be an ideal tool to experimentally study mechanisms underlying the acquisition and the return of anxiety. Future studies could investigate clinical samples and extend the VR paradigm to evolutionary-relevant contexts (e.g., heights, darkness, open spaces)

Prefrontal Brain Activation During Emotional Processing: A Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy Study (fNIRS)

The limbic system and especially the amygdala have been identified as key structures in emotion induction and regulation. Recently research has additionally focused on the influence of prefrontal areas on emotion processing in the limbic system and the amygdala. Results from fMRI studies indicate that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is involved not only in emotion induction but also in emotion regulation. However, studies using fNIRS only report prefrontal brain activation during emotion induction. So far it lacks the attempt to compare emotion induction and emotion regulation with regard to prefrontal activation measured with fNIRS, to exclude the possibility that the reported prefrontal brain activation in fNIRS studies are mainly caused by automatic emotion regulation processes. Therefore this work tried to distinguish emotion induction from regulation via fNIRS of the prefrontal cortex. 20 healthy women viewed neutral pictures as a baseline condition, fearful pictures as induction condition and reappraised fearful pictures as regulation condition in randomized order. As predicted, the view-fearful condition led to higher arousal ratings than the view-neutral condition with the reappraise-fearful condition in between. For the fNIRS results the induction condition showed an activation of the bilateral PFC compared to the baseline condition (viewing neutral). The regulation condition showed an activation only of the left PFC compared to the baseline condition, although the direct comparison between induction and regulation condition revealed no significant difference in brain activation. Therefore our study underscores the results of previous fNIRS studies showing prefrontal brain activation during emotion induction and rejects the hypothesis that this prefrontal brain activation might only be a result of automatic emotion regulation processes

Converging evidence for an impact of a functionalNOSgene variation on anxiety-related processes

Being a complex phenotype with substantial heritability, anxiety and related phenotypes are characterized by a complex polygenic basis. Thereby, one candidate pathway is neuronal nitric oxide (NO) signaling, and accordingly, rodent studies have identified NO synthase (NOS-I), encoded by NOS1, as a strong molecular candidate for modulating anxiety and hippocampus-dependent learning processes. Using a multi-dimensional and -methodological replication approach, we investigated the impact of a functional promoter polymorphism (NOS1-ex1f-VNTR) on human anxiety-related phenotypes in a total of 1019 healthy controls in five different studies. Homozygous carriers of the NOS1-ex1f short-allele displayed enhanced trait anxiety, worrying and depression scores. Furthermore, short-allele carriers were characterized by increased anxious apprehension during contextual fear conditioning. While autonomous measures (fear-potentiated startle) provided only suggestive evidence for a modulatory role of NOS1-ex1f-VNTR on (contextual) fear conditioning processes, neural activation at the amygdala/anterior hippocampus junction was significantly increased in short-allele carriers during context conditioning. Notably, this could not be attributed to morphological differences. In accordance with data from a plethora of rodent studies, we here provide converging evidence from behavioral, subjective, psychophysiological and neuroimaging studies in large human cohorts that NOS-I plays an important role in anxious apprehension but provide only limited evidence for a role in (contextual) fear conditioning

Neuropsychopharmacology advance online publication

There is converging evidence for genetic, biochemical, and neuropsychological factors to increase the risk for anxiety and anxiety disorders. The pathogenesis of anxiety disorders is assumed to be influenced by a complex interaction of these individual risk factors on several levels, affecting intermediate phenotypes of anxiety such as the startle reflex. Thus, in the present double-blind, placebocontrolled study we attempted to paradigmatically investigate a multi-level pathogenetic model of anxiety by testing the effect of 300 mg caffeine citrate as an antagonist at the adenosine A2A receptor vs placebo on the emotion-potentiated (unpleasant, neutral, and pleasant International Affective Picture System pictures) startle reflex in 110 healthy individuals (male ¼ 56, female ¼ 54) stratified for the adenosine A2A receptor (ADORA2A) 1976T4C polymorphism (rs5751876). In addition to the expected main effect of picture category (highest startle amplitude for unpleasant, lowest for pleasant pictures) groups across all ADORA2A 1976T4C genotype and intervention (caffeine vs placebo) groups, an interaction effect of genotype, intervention, and picture category was discerned: In ADORA2A 1976TT risk genotype carriers, highest startle magnitudes were observed after caffeine administration in response to unpleasant pictures, with this effect arising particularly from the female subgroup. Our data point to a complex, multi-level, and potentially gender-specific pathogenetic model of anxiety, with genetic and biochemical factors interactively increasing the risk of maladaptive emotional processing and thereby possibly also anxiety disorders. The present findings may eventually aid in improving primary and secondary prevention by sharpening the risk profiles of anxiety-prone individuals