The downside of tobacco control? Smoking and self-stigma: a systematic review

Objective Little is known about the consequences of tobacco smoking stigma on smokers and how smokers may internalize smoking-related stigma. This review summarizes existing literature on tobacco smoking self-stigma, investigating to what extent smokers are aware of negative stereotypes, agree with them and apply them to themselves. Methods We carried out a systematic search of Pubmed/Web of Science/PsycInfo databases for articles related to smoking self-stigma through June 2013. Reference lists and citations of included studies were also checked and experts were contacted. After screening articles for inclusion/exclusion criteria we performed a quality assessment and summarized findings according to the stages of self-stigma as conceptualized in Corrigan's progressive model of self-stigma (aware, agree, apply and harm). Initial searches yielded 570 articles. Results Thirty of these articles (18 qualitative and 12 quantitative studies) met criteria for our review. Awareness of smoking stigma was virtually universal across studies. Coping strategies for smoking stigma and the degree to which individuals who smoke internalized this stigma varied both within and across studies. There was considerable variation in positive, negative, and non-significant consequences associated with smoking self-stigma. Limited evidence was found for subgroup differences in smoking-related stigma. Conclusion While there is some evidence that smoking self-stigma leads to reductions in smoking, this review also identified significant negative consequences of smoking self-stigma. Future research should assess the factors related to differences in how individuals respond to smoking stigma. Public health strategies which limit the stigmatization of smokers may be warranted

Sexual Orientation, Tobacco Use, and Tobacco Cessation Treatment-Seeking: Results from a National U.S. Survey

Despite higher rates of tobacco use and smoking-related diseases among sexual minorities, tobacco cessation treatment-seeking behaviors (e.g., medication, nicotine replacement products) remain poorly understood across sexual orientation subgroups. This study examines tobacco cessation treatment-seeking behaviors associated with DSM-5 tobacco use disorder (TUD) across the three major sexual orientation dimensions (identity, attraction, behavior) in U.S. adults. Prevalence estimates reflect data collected from a 2012–2013 national sample of adults 18 years and older. More than three-fourths of U.S. adults with TUD had never engaged in tobacco cessation treatment-seeking behaviors, regardless of sexual orientation. Despite having the highest rates of TUD, bisexual men and women had some of the lowest rates of tobacco cessation treatment-seeking. Men who identified as gay, reported same-sex attraction, or same-sex behaviors had the highest rates of tobacco cessation treatment-seeking. In contrast, women with same-sex attraction or same-sex behavior had higher rates of TUD but were less likely to engage in tobacco cessation treatment-seeking behaviors than women with only other-sex attraction or other-sex behavior, respectively. Heterosexual women were more likely to engage in tobacco cessation treatment-seeking than heterosexual men; this sex difference was not present for sexual minorities. Medications and nicotine replacement therapy products were the most prevalent forms of treatment-seeking. There were notable differences in tobacco cessation treatment-seeking behaviors based on sex and sexual orientation. Findings highlight the underutilization of tobacco cessation treatment-seeking among all U.S. adults and point to important factors to consider when working with sexual minorities who are trying to reduce or stop using tobacco

Differences in HIV testing among sexual orientation subgroups in the United States: A national cross-sectional study

Understanding differences in HIV testing among US adults is a crucial step for HIV prevention. This study used cross-sectional data to assess whether HIV testing varies across sexual orientation subgroups and by important psychosocial factors. Data were from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III; n = 36 309, response rate = 60.1%), a nationally representative survey of the US non-institutionalized adult population. Using logistic regression, we examined HIV testing among heterosexual concordant, heterosexual discordant, gay/lesbian, and bisexual adults. Psychosocial correlates included adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), discrimination, educational attainment, social support, and substance use disorders (SUDs). Bisexual (77.0%) and gay/lesbian (65.4%) women had a greater prevalence of HIV testing than concordant heterosexual women (51.6%), and bisexual women had a significantly higher testing prevalence than discordant heterosexual women (54.8%). Gay (84.0%) and bisexual (72.1%) men also had a significantly higher testing prevalence than discordant (48.2%) and concordant (49.4%) heterosexual men. In multivariable models, bisexual men and women (AOR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.3–2.4) and gay men (AOR = 4.7; 95% CI = 3.2–7.1) had significantly greater odds of HIV testing than heterosexual concordant adults. A higher number of ACEs, greater social support, history of SUDs, and higher educational attainment were positively associated with HIV testing. HIV testing prevalence varied across sexual orientation subgroups; discordant heterosexual men had the lowest prevalence. Health care providers should consider a person’s sexual orientation, ACEs, educational attainment, social support, and history of SUDs when evaluating HIV testing needs in the US