Multidisciplinary management of the pregnant patient in haemorrhagic shock secondary to an undiagnosed ruptured liver adenoma.

Management of a ruptured hepatocellular adenoma during pregnancy is a rare and potentially life-threatening entity. Few case reports have described management of the pregnant patient who presents in haemorrhagic shock secondary to a ruptured liver adenoma. A 30-year-old primigravid woman at 31 weeks pregnant presented with abdominal pain and fetal bradycardia. After stat caesarean delivery of the infant, she had continued hemoperitoneum and was in shock secondary to an undiagnosed ruptured liver mass. General surgery was consulted intraoperatively and performed an exploratory laparotomy, packing and temporary closure. She was subsequently taken to interventional radiology (IR) for angioembolisation of the left hepatic artery. After stabilisation, she underwent formal abdominal closure. Management of a ruptured hepatocellular adenoma in pregnancy requires urgent multidisciplinary care including obstetrics gynaecology, general surgery and IR

Multidisciplinary management of the pregnant patient in haemorrhagic shock secondary to an undiagnosed ruptured liver adenoma.

Management of a ruptured hepatocellular adenoma during pregnancy is a rare and potentially life-threatening entity. Few case reports have described management of the pregnant patient who presents in haemorrhagic shock secondary to a ruptured liver adenoma. A 30-year-old primigravid woman at 31 weeks pregnant presented with abdominal pain and fetal bradycardia. After stat caesarean delivery of the infant, she had continued hemoperitoneum and was in shock secondary to an undiagnosed ruptured liver mass. General surgery was consulted intraoperatively and performed an exploratory laparotomy, packing and temporary closure. She was subsequently taken to interventional radiology (IR) for angioembolisation of the left hepatic artery. After stabilisation, she underwent formal abdominal closure. Management of a ruptured hepatocellular adenoma in pregnancy requires urgent multidisciplinary care including obstetrics gynaecology, general surgery and IR

Racial Disparity in Placement of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A TQIP Analysis

BACKGROUND: The Brain Trauma Foundation recommends intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Race is associated with worse outcomes after TBI. The reasons for racial disparities in clinical decision-making around ICP monitor placement remain unclear. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the TQIP database from 2017 to 2019 and included patients 16 years or older, with blunt severe TBI, defined as a head abbreviated injury score 3 or greater. Exclusion criteria were missing race, those without signs of life on admission, length of stay 1 day or less, and AIS of 6 in any body region. The primary outcome was ICP monitor placement, which was calculated using a Poisson regression model with robust SEs while adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 260,814 patients were included: 218,939 White, 29,873 Black, 8,322 Asian, 2,884 American Indian, and 796 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. Asian and American Indian patients had the highest rates of midline shift (16.5% and 16.9%). Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders had the highest rates of neurosurgical intervention (19.3%) and ICP monitor placement (6.5%). Asian patients were found to be 19% more likely to receive ICP monitoring (adjusted incident rate ratio 1.19; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.33; p = 0.003], and American Indian patients were 38% less likely (adjusted incident rate ratio 0.62; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.79; p \u3c 0.001), compared with White patients, respectively. No differences were detected between White and Black patients. CONCLUSIONS: ICP monitoring use differs by race. Further work is needed to elucidate modifiable causes of this difference in the management of severe TBI

Factors Associated With a Discharge Against Medical Advice From an Emergency Department in Adult Patients With Appendicitis

BACKGROUND: Delays in care can lead to worsened outcomes with acute appendicitis. To get timely treatment, patients must consent. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there are racial and socioeconomic differences in discharge against medical advice (DAMA) rates from an emergency department after the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. METHODS: Patients were identified retrospectively from the 2019 National Emergency Department Sample. The inclusion criteria were patients 18 years of age or older with acute appendicitis. Rates were compared using chi-square or Fisher\u27s exact test. Odds ratios were determined using multiple logistic regression. A p value of 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: The overall rate of DAMA was low (0.37%). Black patients had the highest rate, and White patients had the lowest (0.72% and 0.28%, respectively, p \u3c 0.001). When controlling for covariates, Black patients also had a higher odds ratio (OR) for DAMA (OR 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.97). Male patients had a higher unadjusted rate (0.47% vs. 0.26% in females, p \u3c 0.001) and were at increased risk (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.32-2.41). Patients between 30 and 65 years old had an increased risk (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.10-2.0). Patients with government insurance or no insurance had higher rates than private insurance (0.57% and 0.56% vs. 0.23% respectively, p \u3c 0.001). CONCLUSION: Race, insurance status, age, and male sex were all associated with increase in DAMA. Risk stratifying patients can help to determine how to best employ mitigations strategies. Reducing DAMA may be the next area for improving reducing disparities in appendicitis care