2 research outputs found

    Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy as a potential therapeutic option in NSCLC UICC stage IIIA with multilevel N2 disease

    No full text
    Lung Cancer is still one of the leading causes for cancer related death worldwide. The determina-tion of an adequate therapeutic approach requests a precise staging, which contains computed to-mography (CT) of the thorax, positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT), cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) and pulmonary function testing as well as the pa-tient's opinion. In UICC stages I and II, if there is functional operability and technical resectabil-ity, the treatment of choice is primary surgery followed by adjuvant therapy depending on lymph node status, while patients in the metastatic stage IV, or with locally advanced, nonresectable dis-ease are more likely to receive definitive chemoradiation therapy. The UICC Stage III (8th edi-tion) combines a heterogeneous group of patients that remains the focus of discussion regarding the optimal therapeutic regimen, which ranges from primary surgical care to a neoadjuvant ther-apeutic approach, to definitive conservative treatment. Since March 2020, we have been treating a patient on an interdisciplinary basis who initially had a UICC stage IIIA multilevel N-2 pul-monary adenocarcinoma and finally underwent successful surgery after a very good response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Our latest follow-up showed no evidence of recurrence. Sim-ilar to current ongoing studies our case shows, that neoadjuvant immunotherapy is a reasonable alternative to conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Hemangiosis carcinomatosa as an independent risk factor for long-term survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients

    No full text
    Objectives: Recent studies have shown that blood vessel invasion (V1) influences the long-term survival of patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to emphasize V1 as an independent risk factor. We evaluated the effects of V1 on the survival of NSCLC patients with UICC stages I, II, and III after surgery. Methods: This retrospective study includes 747 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent anatomic resection and radical lymphadenectomy at our institution between January 2012 and December 2020. V1- were compared to V0-patients (no blood vessel invasion). All patients received adjuvant therapy according to European guidelines when indicated. After excluding patients with detection of lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, tumorcells at the resection margin, distant metastases and those, that received neoadjuvant therapy, 1-, 3- and 5- year survival rates were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method. To proof V1 as an independent risk factor, a propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed regarding age, gender, UICC-stage, lymph-node involvement, and comorbidities. Results: A total of 461 patients (V0: 440; V1: 21) were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics did not show any significant difference. Mean age in V0-group was 65.7 +/- 10.5 years and 64.1 +/- 8.6 years in V1-group (p-value = 0.5). In the V0-group 54.8% were male, whereas in the V1-group this number was 66.7% (p-value = 0.37). Mean survival in V1-group was significantly shorter compared to V0-group (V1: 45.8 +/- 9.3 months; V0: 81.1 +/- 1.1 months; p-value<0.001). This was confirmed after applying a propensity score matched analysis (V0: 99.9 +/- 4.9 months; V1: 45.8 +/- 9.3 months; p-value<0.001) - V1 is a prognostic marker independent of UICC stage. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were significantly shorter for V1-patients (1-year: V0: 100%; V1: 70.6%; p-value = 0.012) (3-year: V0: 95.2%; V1: 46.2%; p-value = 0.002) (5-year: V0: 90.5%; V1: 36.4%; pvalue = 0.003). Conclusion: As we have shown with our investigations, V1 has a major impact on long-term survival in NSCLC patients and furthermore, acts as an independent risk factor. Due to our small but specified sample size, our statement should be confirmed by a multicenter study. In the meantime, we suggest making the implementation of the V0/V1 specification mandatory in the tumor classification
    corecore