2,150 research outputs found
The periodic b-equation and Euler equations on the circle
In this note we show that the periodic b-equation can only be realized as an
Euler equation on the Lie group Diff(S^1) of all smooth and orientiation
preserving diffeomorphisms on the cirlce if b=2, i.e. for the Camassa-Holm
equation. In this case the inertia operator generating the metric on Diff(S^1)
is given by A=1-d^2/dx^2. In contrast, the Degasperis-Procesi equation, for
which b=3, is not an Euler equation on Diff(S^1) for any inertia operator. Our
result generalizes a recent result of B. Kolev.Comment: 8 page
The geometry of a vorticity model equation
We provide rigorous evidence of the fact that the modified
Constantin-Lax-Majda equation modeling vortex and quasi-geostrophic dynamics
describes the geodesic flow on the subgroup of orientation-preserving
diffeomorphisms fixing one point, with respect to right-invariant metric
induced by the homogeneous Sobolev norm and show the local existence
of the geodesics in the extended group of diffeomorphisms of Sobolev class
with .Comment: 24 page
The curvature of semidirect product groups associated with two-component Hunter-Saxton systems
In this paper, we study two-component versions of the periodic Hunter-Saxton
equation and its -variant. Considering both equations as a geodesic flow
on the semidirect product of the circle diffeomorphism group \Diff(\S) with a
space of scalar functions on we show that both equations are locally
well-posed. The main result of the paper is that the sectional curvature
associated with the 2HS is constant and positive and that 2HS allows for a
large subspace of positive sectional curvature. The issues of this paper are
related to some of the results for 2CH and 2DP presented in [J. Escher, M.
Kohlmann, and J. Lenells, J. Geom. Phys. 61 (2011), 436-452].Comment: 19 page
Reaction cross-section predictions for nucleon induced reactions
A microscopic calculation of the optical potential for nucleon-nucleus
scattering has been performed by explicitly coupling the elastic channel to all
the particle-hole (p-h) excitation states in the target and to all relevant
pickup channels. These p-h states may be regarded as doorway states through
which the flux flows to more complicated configurations, and to long-lived
compound nucleus resonances. We calculated the reaction cross sections for the
nucleon induced reactions on the targets Ca, Ni, Zr and
Sm using the QRPA description of target excitations, coupling to all
inelastic open channels, and coupling to all transfer channels corresponding to
the formation of a deuteron. The results of such calculations were compared to
predictions of a well-established optical potential and with experimental data,
reaching very good agreement. The inclusion of couplings to pickup channels
were an important contribution to the absorption. For the first time,
calculations of excitations account for all of the observed reaction
cross-sections, at least for incident energies above 10 MeV.Comment: 6 pages, 6 figures. Submitted to INPC 2010 Conference Proceeding
Toxic Mixtures in Time—The Sequence Makes the Poison
“The dose makes the poison”. This principle assumes that once a chemical is cleared out of the organism (toxicokinetic recovery), it no longer has any effect. However, it overlooks the other process of re-establishing homeostasis, toxicodynamic recovery, which can be fast or slow depending on the chemical. Therefore, when organisms are exposed to two toxicants in sequence, the toxicity can differ if their order is reversed. We test this hypothesis with the freshwater crustacean Gammarus pulex and four toxicants that act on different targets (diazinon, propiconazole, 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol, 4-nitrobenzyl chloride). We found clearly different toxicity when the exposure order of two toxicants was reversed, while maintaining the same dose. Slow toxicodynamic recovery caused carry-over toxicity in subsequent exposures, thereby resulting in a sequence effect–but only when toxicodynamic recovery was slow relative to the interval between exposures. This suggests that carry-over toxicity is a useful proxy for organism fitness and that risk assessment methods should be revised as they currently could underestimate risk. We provide the first evidence that carry-over toxicity occurs among chemicals acting on different targets and when exposure is several days apart. It is therefore not only the dose that makes the poison but also the exposure sequence
- …