Advances in the Management of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Focus on Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Effective treatment options in advanced/progressive/metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) are currently limited. As in other neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been used as a therapeutic option in MTC. To date, however, there are no published reviews dealing with PRRT approaches. We performed an in-depth narrative review on the studies published in this field and collected information on registered clinical trials related to this topic. We identified 19 published studies, collectively involving more than 200 patients with MTC, and four registered clinical trials. Most cases of MTC were treated with PRRT with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) radiolabelled with 90 yttrium (90Y) and 177 lutetium (177Lu). These radiopharmaceuticals show efficacy in the treatment of patients with MTC, with a favourable radiological response (stable disease, partial response or complete response) in more than 60% of cases, coupled with low toxicity. As MTC specifically also expresses cholecystokinin receptors (CCK2Rs), PRRT with this target has also been tried, and some randomised trials are ongoing. Overall, PRRT seems to have an effective role and might be considered in the therapeutic strategy of advanced/progressive/metastatic MTC

Efficacy of pasireotide LAR for acromegaly: a prolonged real-world monocentric study

BackgroundAcromegaly is caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1). Medical therapy plays a role as a treatment option for persistent disease after non-curative surgery or as a first-line therapy when surgery is not feasible. Pasireotide-LAR (Pas-LAR) is recommended for patients with acromegaly as second-line treatment.AimTo evaluate the patients characteristics predictive of an adequate response to Pas-LAR and the long-term efficacy and safety of the Pas-LAR treatment.MethodsData from 19 patients with active acromegaly, who were and resistant or intolerant to first-line medical therapy and were switched to pas-LAR have been retrospectively collected. We compared the baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients who were found to respond to Pas-LAR therapy (responders, n=14) with those of patients who did not respond (non-responders, n=5). We then evaluated the Pas-LAR efficacy and safety during long-term follow-up in responders.ResultsIGF1 normalization occurred in 71.4% of responders after one injection. IGF1 levels, [median(interquartile range) of the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) fold increase] were higher in non-responders compared to responders within the initial month of therapy [1.40(1.30-2.34) vs 0.70(0.55-1.25), respectively, p=0.009] and after three [1.77(1.74-2.29) vs 0.94(0.82-1.13), respectively, p=0.029] and six months [1.68(1.33-1.72) vs 1.00(0.65 -1.28), respectively, p=0.002]. Out of 6 patients with symptomatic headache (all in responder group), 5 and 1 reported the resolution and improvement of headache, respectively, already after the first injection. Median HbA1c levels tended to increase from baseline to 6 months both in responder (36 mMol/Mol to 42 mMol/Mol) and non-responder patients (45 mMol/Mol to 48 mMol/Mol). During long term follow up, in the responder group 2 new patients developed diabetes. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 6 out of 7 evaluated responders, with no cases of size increase during the long-term follow-up.ConclusionPas-LAR is effective and safe and the early identification of responders is possible just after the first administration

Proteasome inhibitors in medullary thyroid carcinoma: time to restart with clinical trials?

IntroductionMedullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare thyroid tumour whose management in advanced stages is challenging, despite effective therapeutic options having expanded in recent years. Proteasome inhibitors (PrIn) have shown the ability to improve patient outcomes, including survival and quality of life, in several malignancies, due to their ability to impair cell proliferation and cause apoptosis through the inhibition of the proteasome activity. Consequently, these drugs could represent a useful tool, alone or in combination with other treatments, in MTC patients.Aim of the studyThis review aims to summarize the available in vitro and in vivo data about the role of PrIn in MTC.Materials and methodsWe performed an extensive search for relevant data sources, including full-published articles in international online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus), preliminary reports in selected international meeting abstract repositories, and short articles published as supplements of international meetings, by using the following terms: medullary thyroid carcinoma, proteasome inhibitors, bortezomib, carfilzomib, ixazomib, delanzomib, marizomib, oprozomib, and MG132. Additionally, we conducted with the same keywords, an in-depth search in registered clinical trials repositories.ResultsOur search revealed in vitro studies in human and murine MTC cell lines, based on the use of PrIns, both alone and in combination with other anticancer drugs, and two pertinent clinical trials.ConclusionWe found a strong discrepancy between the evidence of PrIns effects in preclinical studies, and the scarcity or early interruption of clinical trials. We might speculate that difficulties in enrolling patients, as happens in other rare diseases, may have discouraged trials’ implementation in favor of drugs already approved for MTC. However, given the concrete improvement in the comprehension of the molecular basis of PrIn effects in MTC, new clinical trials with accurate inclusion criteria of enrollment might be warranted, in order to ascertain whether this treatment, alone or in combination with other drugs, could indeed represent an option to enhance the therapeutic response, and to ultimately improve patients’ outcome and survival

Pathology reporting in neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system: everything you always wanted to know but were too afraid to ask

During the 5th NIKE (Neuroendocrine tumors Innovation in Knowledge and Education) meeting, held in Naples, Italy, in May 2019, discussions centered on the understanding of pathology reports of gastroenetropancreactic neuroendocrine neoplasms. In particular, the main problem concerned the difficulty that clinicians experience in extrapolating relevant information from neuroendocrine tumor pathology reports. During the meeting, participants were asked to identify and rate issues which they have encountered, for which the input of an expert pathologist would have been appreciated. This article is a collection of the most rated questions and relative answers, focusing on three main topics: 1) morphology and classification; 2) Ki67 and grading; 3) immunohistochemistry. Patient management should be based on multidisciplinary decisions, taking into account clinical and pathology-related features with clear comprehension between all health care professionals. Indeed, pathologists require clinical details and laboratory findings when relevant, while clinicians require concise and standardized reports. In keeping with this last statement, the minimum requirements in pathology datasets are provided in this paper and should be a baseline for all neuroendocrine tumor professionals

Commentary: Case Report: Abdominal Lymph Node Metastases of Parathyroid Carcinoma: Diagnostic Workup, Molecular Diagnosis, and Clinical Management

In the issue of March 2021, Lenschow et al. reported the case of a 46-year-old woman with recurrent, programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) negative, tumor mutational burden (TMB)-high parathyroid carcinoma (PC), who showed stable disease as her best response on imaging, and a three-fold drop in PTH after treatment with intravenous pembrolizumab. Given the remarkable results obtained by Lenschow et al. with the anti-PD-1 agent pembrolizumab in the above-mentioned case, we performed an extensive search for possible further relevant data sources, including a) full published articles in international online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase); b) preliminary reports in selected international meeting abstract repositories (American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASCO; European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, ENET; European Society for Medical Oncology, ESMO); c) registered clinical trials in the U.S. National Institutes of Health registry of clinical trials (http://clinicaltrials.gov) and in any primary register of the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)

Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling

Simultaneous bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) plays a crucial role in the diagnostic work-up of Cushing’s syndrome. It is the most accurate procedure in the differential diagnosis of hypercortisolism of pituitary or ectopic origin, as compared with clinical, biochemical and imaging analyses, with a sensitivity and specificity of 88–100% and 67–100%, respectively. In the setting of hypercortisolemia, ACTH levels obtained from venous drainage of the pituitary are expected to be higher than the levels of peripheral blood, thus suggesting pituitary ACTH excess as the cause of hypercortisolism. Direct stimulation of the pituitary corticotroph with corticotrophin-releasing hormone enhances the sensitivity of the procedure. The procedure must be undertaken in the presence of hypercortisolemia, which suppresses both the basal and stimulated secretory activity of normal corticotrophic cells: ACTH measured in the sinus is, therefore, the result of the secretory activity of the tumor tissue. The poor accuracy in lateralization of BIPSS (positive predictive value of 50–70%) makes interpetrosal ACTH gradient alone not sufficient for the localization of the tumor. An accurate exploration of the gland is recommended if a tumor is not found in the predicted area. Despite the fact that BIPSS is an invasive procedure, the occurrence of adverse events is extremely rare, particularly if it is performed by experienced operators in referral centres

Circulating tumor cells and miRNAs as prognostic markers in neuroendocrine neoplasms

The prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is widely variable and has been shown to associate with several tissue- and blood-based biomarkers in different settings. The identification of prognostic factors predicting NEN outcome is of paramount importance to select the best clinical management for these patients. Prognostic markers have been intensively investigated, also taking advantage of the most modern techniques, in the perspective of personalized medicine and appropriate resource utilization. This review summarizes the available data on the possible role of circulating tumor cells and microRNAs as prognostic markers in NENs

What Lies behind Paraneoplastic Hypercalcemia Secondary to Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Neoplasms? A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) originate from neuroendocrine cells ubiquitously spread throughout the body. Hypercalcemia associated with cancer is the most common life-threatening metabolic disorder in patients with advanced stage cancer. Paraneoplastic hypercalcemia is more commonly associated with hematological malignancies, renal and breast carcinomas, and squamous cell carcinomas, but it has also been described in patients with well-differentiated NEN, where it often remains undiagnosed. Among its causes, systemic secretion of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) and ectopic production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) may be considered paraneoplastic causes of hypercalcemia. In order to clarify the diagnostic work up of paraneoplastic hypercalcemia in patients with NEN, we perform a systematic review, which is lacking in the literature. Methods: We performed a data search using MEDLINE and SCOPUS including papers from 1961 to 2021. We selected articles on paraneoplastic hypercalcemia associated with well-differentiated NEN. Results: The search led to the selection of 78 publications for a total of 114 patients. Pooled data showed that the most frequent primary tumor site associated with paraneoplastic hypercalcemia was pancreatic NEN, followed by Pheochromocytoma. In most cases, paraneoplastic hypercalcemia was caused by PTHrP production and secretion. In more than two thirds of cases, paraneoplastic hypercalcemia was present at the time of NEN diagnosis and, in metachronous cases, was related to local recurrence, distant metastasis development, or tumor progression. In most patients, a combination of therapeutic approaches was employed, and reduction of the tumor burden was essential to control the paraneoplastic syndrome. Discussion: The onset of hypercalcemia associated with cancer in patients with well-differentiated NEN represents a major clinical challenge. The complex clinical and therapeutical management of paraneoplastic hypercalcemia implies the need for a multidisciplinary approach, aimed at controlling the clinical syndrome and tumor growth

Case Report: Unmasking Hypercalcemia in Patients With Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Experience From Six Italian Referral Centers

BACKGROUND: Hypercalcemia is a common paraneoplastic syndrome which can occur in up to 10% of patients with advanced neoplasms. Paraneoplastic parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) represents the most frequent cause of this syndrome. In neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) paraneoplastic hypercalcemia is rare. CASE SERIES: The present series includes all patients with NENs and paraneoplastic hypercalcemia from four Italian centres: (I) A 40-year-old man was hospitalized for repeated episodes of falls, hyposthenia and drowsiness. Severe hypercalcemia was found. Metastatic pancreatic G2 NEN and PTHrP-related hypercalcemia were diagnosed. The patient started therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSA) and Denosumab. After disease progression peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) was started with an objective response associated with PTHrP reduction and normocalcemia. (II) A 45-year-old man was referred for pancreatic G2 NEN. SSA and subsequently everolimus were administered for metastases occurrence. Hypercalcemia occurred and PRRT and Denosumab were started for disease progression with the onset of bone metastases. Despite disease stability after four cycles of PRRT the patient’s performance status worsened until death. (III) A 49-year-old woman was hospitalized for psychic slowdown, confusional state, sensory dullness. A severe hypercalcemia, associated with a pancreatic G1 NEN was diagnosed and treated with haemodialysis, bisphosphonates injections and continuous infusion of calcitonin. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D was high, PTHrP was undetectable. After surgery serum calcium levels and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D were normalized. (IV) A 69-year-old man was hospitalized after the onset of shortness of breath and dyspnea, asthenia and weight loss. Computed Tomography (CT) and (68)Ga DOTATOC Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-CT revealed a left pulmonary nodule. Hypercalcemia and markedly elevated PTHrP levels were detected. The histological examination revealed an atypical carcinoid. After surgery, calcium levels were normalized, PTHrP was significantly reduced with an improvement of general conditions. CONCLUSION: In our series, paraneoplastic PTHrP-related hypercalcemia occurred in pancreatic NEN and in one bronchial carcinoid representing the third case in the literature. Our case associated with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D secretion represents the fourth case in the literature. PTHrP secretion should be considered in NENs’ patients with hypercalcemia. Acute treatment should be focused on lowering calcium levels, and long-term control can be achieved by tumor cytoreduction inhibiting PTHrP release