29 research outputs found

    Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height

    Get PDF
    Most common human traits and diseases have a polygenic pattern of inheritance: DNA sequence variants at many genetic loci influence the phenotype. Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have identified more than 600 variants associated with human traits, but these typically explain small fractions of phenotypic variation, raising questions about the use of further studies. Here, using 183,727 individuals, we show that hundreds of genetic variants, in at least 180 loci, influence adult height, a highly heritable and classic polygenic trait. The large number of loci reveals patterns with important implications for genetic studies of common human diseases and traits. First, the 180 loci are not random, but instead are enriched for genes that are connected in biological pathways (P = 0.016) and that underlie skeletal growth defects (P < 0.001). Second, the likely causal gene is often located near the most strongly associated variant: in 13 of 21 loci containing a known skeletal growth gene, that gene was closest to the associated variant. Third, at least 19 loci have multiple independently associated variants, suggesting that allelic heterogeneity is a frequent feature of polygenic traits, that comprehensive explorations of already-discovered loci should discover additional variants and that an appreciable fraction of associated loci may have been identified. Fourth, associated variants are enriched for likely functional effects on genes, being over-represented among variants that alter amino-acid structure of proteins and expression levels of nearby genes. Our data explain approximately 10% of the phenotypic variation in height, and we estimate that unidentified common variants of similar effect sizes would increase this figure to approximately 16% of phenotypic variation (approximately 20% of heritable variation). Although additional approaches are needed to dissect the genetic architecture of polygenic human traits fully, our findings indicate that GWA studies can identify large numbers of loci that implicate biologically relevant genes and pathways.

    Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, NAIP, cIAP1 and cIAP2 expression during macrophage differentiation and M1/M2 polarization

    Get PDF
    Monocytes and macrophages constitute the first line of defense of the immune system against external pathogens. Macrophages have a highly plastic phenotype depending on environmental conditions; the extremes of this phenotypic spectrum are a pro-inflammatory defensive role (M1 phenotype) and an anti-inflammatory tissue-repair one (M2 phenotype). The Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) proteins have important roles in the regulation of several cellular processes, including innate and adaptive immunity. In this study we have analyzed the differential expression of the IAPs, NAIP, cIAP1 and cIAP2, during macrophage differentiation and polarization into M1 or M2. In polarized THP-1 cells and primary human macrophages, NAIP is abundantly expressed in M2 macrophages, while cIAP1 and cIAP2 show an inverse pattern of expression in polarized macrophages, with elevated expression levels of cIAP1 in M2 and cIAP2 preferentially expressed in M1. Interestingly, treatment with the IAP antagonist SMC-LCL161, induced the upregulation of NAIP in M2, the downregulation of cIAP1 in M1 and M2 and an induction of cIAP2 in M1 macrophages.This work was supported by Universidad de Granada, Plan Propio 2015;#P3B: FAM, VMC (http://investigacion.ugr.es/pages/planpropio/2015/ resoluciones/p3b_def_28072015); Universidad de Granada CEI BioTic;#CAEP2-84: VMC (http:// biotic.ugr.es/pages/resolucionprovisional enseaanzapractica22demayo/!); and Canadian nstitutes of Health Research;#231421, #318176, #361847: STB, ECL, RK (http://www.cihr-irsc.gc. ca/e/193.html). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

    A versatile, bar-coded nuclear marker/reporter for live cell fluorescent and multiplexed high content imaging.

    Get PDF
    The screening of large numbers of compounds or siRNAs is a mainstay of both academic and pharmaceutical research. Most screens test those interventions against a single biochemical or cellular output whereas recording multiple complementary outputs may be more biologically relevant. High throughput, multi-channel fluorescence microscopy permits multiple outputs to be quantified in specific cellular subcompartments. However, the number of distinct fluorescent outputs available remains limited. Here, we describe a cellular bar-code technology in which multiple cell-based assays are combined in one well after which each assay is distinguished by fluorescence microscopy. The technology uses the unique fluorescent properties of assay-specific markers comprised of distinct combinations of different 'red' fluorescent proteins sandwiched around a nuclear localization signal. The bar-code markers are excited by a common wavelength of light but distinguished ratiometrically by their differing relative fluorescence in two emission channels. Targeting the bar-code to cell nuclei enables individual cells expressing distinguishable markers to be readily separated by standard image analysis programs. We validated the method by showing that the unique responses of different cell-based assays to specific drugs are retained when three assays are co-plated and separated by the bar-code. Based upon those studies, we discuss a roadmap in which even more assays may be combined in a well. The ability to analyze multiple assays simultaneously will enable screens that better identify, characterize and distinguish hits according to multiple biologically or clinically relevant criteria. These capabilities also enable the re-creation of complex mixtures of cell types that is emerging as a central area of interest in many fields

    Molecular Basis for Specific Recognition of Bacterial Ligands by NAIP/NLRC4 Inflammasomes

    Full text link
    NLR (nucleotide-binding domain [NBD]- and leucine-rich repeat [LRR]-containing) proteins mediate innate immune sensing of pathogens in mammals and plants. How NLRs detect their cognate stimuli remains poorly understood. Here, we analyzed ligand recognition by NLR apoptosis inhibitory protein (NAIP) inflammasomes. Mice express multiple highly related NAIP paralogs that recognize distinct bacterial proteins. We analyzed a panel of 43 chimeric NAIPs, allowing us to map the NAIP domain responsible for specific ligand detection. Surprisingly, ligand specificity was mediated not by the LRR domain, but by an internal region encompassing several NBD-associated α-helical domains. Interestingly, we find that the ligand specificity domain has evolved under positive selection in both rodents and primates. We further show that ligand binding is required for the subsequent co-oligomerization of NAIPs with the downstream signaling adaptor NLR family, CARD-containing 4 (NLRC4). These data provide a molecular basis for how NLRs detect ligands and assemble into inflammasomes

    Growth properties of a FP<sub>NLS</sub>FP-tagged LNCaP-C4-2 prostate cancer cell line.

    Full text link
    <p>Hoechst-stained nuclei are counted on Day 0 and, on replicate plates, 4 Days later.</p>*<p>These plates were exposed to FP<sub>NLS</sub>FP excitation light on Day 0 to establish if light exposure altered growth of FP<sub>NLS</sub>FP-positive or FP<sub>NLS</sub>FP-negative cells.</p

    Application of bar-code to cell counting studies.

    Full text link
    <p><b>A,</b> Concept of bar-code for mixing differentially marked FP<sub>NLS</sub>FP expressing cells. <b>B,</b> Differential response of two LNCaP-C4-2 cell subclones to an inhibitor of cell growth (actinomycin D). <b>C,</b> em1/em2 ratios of all cells within a representative well (x-axis) compared to the intensities of each cell in the em1 channel. <b>D,</b> LNCaP-C4-2 cells mixed, co-plated, treated exactly as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0063286#pone-0063286-g005" target="_blank">figure 5B</a> then separated according to the bar-code showed similar treatment responses to the individually plated cells. Growth measurements are shown as the mean +/− sd from 8 (Fig. 5B) or 16 (Fig. 5D) wells for each treatment condition. *, statistically significant (p<0.01) increases or decrease in cell number relative to vehicle-treated cells; #, statistically significant (p<0.01) increase in cell number of DHT/actinomycin D treated wells relative to actinomycin D-treated wells.</p

    Bar-Coded FP<sub>NLS</sub>FP Nuclear Markers.

    Full text link
    <p>Ratio of fluorescence emitted in em1 (635–675 nm) relative to that emitted in em2 (608–648 nm) for the FP-N<sub>NLS</sub>FP-C bar-code vectors. Ratios determined in 10x images collected on transiently transfected CHO cells.</p

    Effective discrimination of three bar-coded cell-based assays.

    Full text link
    *<p>Range of em1/em2 ratios within which the segmented nuclei were assigned, defined by mean +/−3 sd in em1/em2 ratios characteristic of each cell line.</p
    corecore