Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation

Research on surgical interventions is associated with several methodological and practical challenges of which few, if any, apply only to surgery. However, surgical evaluation is especially demanding because many of these challenges coincide. In this report, the second of three on surgical innovation and evaluation, we discuss obstacles related to the study design of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies assessing surgical interventions. We also describe the issues related to the nature of surgical procedures—for example, their complexity, surgeon-related factors, and the range of outcomes. Although difficult, surgical evaluation is achievable and necessary. Solutions tailored to surgical research and a framework for generating evidence on which to base surgical practice are essential.The Balliol Colloquium has been supported by Ethicon UK with unrestricted educational grants and by the National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme. The Balliol Colloquium was administratively and financially supported by the Nuffield Department of Surgery at the University of Oxford and the Department of Surgery at McGill University. JAC holds a Medical Research Council UK special training fellowship. The University of Aberdeen’s Health Services Research Unit is core funded by the Chief Scientist Offi ce of the Scottish Government Health Directorates. IB is supported by a grant from the Société Française de Rhumatologie and Lavoisier Program (Ministère des Aff aires Etrangères et Européennes). PLE is a DPhil Candidate in Evidence-Based Health Care at Oxford University

Impact of transfusion of mediastinal shed blood on serum levels of cardiac enzymes

Infusion of shed mediastinal blood using an autotransfusion system is a widely applied technique of blood conservation in cardiac surgery. Serial determinations of serum creatine kinase (CK), its MB isoenzyme (CK-MB), and lactate hydrogenase (LDH) levels have been used to monitor perioperative myocardial injury. We investigated the impact of postoperative autotransfused blood infusion on serum levels of these enzymes. We performed a retrospective analysis of postoperative serum CK, CK-MB, and LDH levels of 300 patients who had elective uncomplicated aortocoronary bypass grafting. Shed mediastinal blood samples from 26 patients were analyzed for CK, CK-MB (enzymatic activity and mass), and LDH levels before infusion. High postoperative serum levels of CK and LDH were observed after infusion of autotransfused blood. Shed mediastinal blood contained extremely high levels of these enzymes, particularly from patients who had internal mammary artery dissection. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.96) between measured CK-MB enzyme activities and those calculated from the CK-MB mass units. Infusion of autotransfused blood containing high concentrations of CK and LDH results in elevated serum levels of these enzymes. Hemolysis, frequently present in shed blood, does not interfere with the routine biochemical assays for CK and CK-MB enzyme activities. Caution should be taken when postoperative cardiac enzyme levels are used to determine myocardial injury after aortocoronary bypass grafting if autotransfusion is used as a method of blood conservation