Lymphatic drainage of lung cancer follows an intersegmental pathway within the visceral pleura

International audienceObjectives: Lung cancer tumors are known to be highly lymphophilic. There are two different pattern of lymphatic drainage of the lung: one peribronchial lymphatic pathway, and another one within the visceral pleura which appears to be more intersegmental than the peribronchial pathway. We aimed to assess the prevalence of an intersegmental pathway in the lymphatic drainage of lung tumors within the visceral pleura and determine potential influential factors. Methods: In this prospective study, we included all patients for whom a major pulmonary resection (lobar) was indicated and performed for suspected or proven lung cancer. An immediate ex-vivo evaluation of the surgical specimen after resection was conducted by trans-pleural injection of blue dye within the tumor. The pathways followed by the lymphatic vessels under the visceral pleura were assessed to define the occurrence of an intersegmental pathway, which was defined by the presence of blue dye within the lymphatic vessel crossing to a neighboring pulmonary segment, distinct from the tumorous segment. Results: Fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria and were assessed over a three-year period. Lymphatic drainage within the visceral pleura followed an intersegmental pathway in 35 of 53 patients (66 %). When the lymphatic drainage of the tumor was intersegmental, it drained in a single other segment in 21/35 cases and two or more in 14/35 cases. Logistic regression with multivariate analysis showed a peripheral location of the tumor to be a risk factor for the intersegmental pathway of visceral pleura lymphatic drainage (OR = 0.87 [079-0.95], p = 0.003). Conclusion: These results confirm that lymphatic drainage of lung cancer in the visceral pleura appears to largely follow an intersegmental pathway, especially when the tumor is peripheral, close to the visceral pleura

Prognostic Value of Acute Cor Pulmonale in COVID-19-related Pneumonia: A Prospective Study.

International audienceBACKGROUND: It is known that acute cor pulmonale (ACP) worsens the prognosis of non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (NC-ARDS). The ACP risk score evaluates the risk of ACP occurrence in mechanically ventilated patients with NC-ARDS. There is less data on the risk factors and prognosis of ACP induced by COVID-19-related pneumonia. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of ACP, assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and clinical factors associated with ACP in a cohort of patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2020 and June 2021, patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) at Amiens University Hospital for COVID-19-related pneumonia were assessed by TTE within 48 h of admission. ACP was defined as a right ventricle/left ventricle area ratio of >0.6 associated with septal dyskinesia. The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days. RESULTS: Among 146 patients included, 36% (n = 52/156) developed ACP of which 38% (n = 20/52) were non-intubated patients. The classical risk factors of ACP (found in NC-ARDS) such as PaCO(2) >48 mmHg, driving pressure >18 mmHg, and PaO(2)/FiO(2) 0.1). The primary outcome occurred in 32 (22%) patients. More patients died in the ACP group (n = 20/52 (38%) vs. n = 12/94 (13%), P = 0.001). ACP [hazards ratio (HR) = 3.35, 95%CI [1.56-7.18], P = 0.002] and age >65 years (HR = 2.92, 95%CI [1.50-5.66], P = 0.002) were independent risk factors of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: ACP was a frequent complication in ICU patients admitted for COVID-19-related pneumonia. The 30-day-mortality was 38% in these patients. In COVID-19-related pneumonia, the classical risk factors of ACP did not seem relevant. These results need confirmation in further studies

New Approaches to Manage Infections in Transplant Recipients: Report From the 2023 GTI (Infection and Transplantation Group) Annual Meeting

International audienceThis year’s GTI (“Groupe Transplantation and Infection”) annual meeting was held in Paris, France in February 2023. This meeting focused on new approaches to manage infectious complications in solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients. In this meeting report, we summarize the presentations and discussions from this annual meeting. Covered topics included new anti-infective agents and non-antibiotic approaches to manage infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, staphylococci, and fungal infections, as well as new approaches to manage symptomatic urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients. Innovative approaches are needed to manage infectious complications in transplant recipients, who are at high risk of difficult-to-treat infections and side effects associated with the use of anti-infective agents.No abstract availabl

Reverse transcriptase multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in endomyocardial biopsies for the diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection

International audienceBackground: Molecular biology has emerged as a potential companion to histology for the diagnosis of rejection after heart transplantation. Reverse transcriptase multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (RT-MLPA) is a technique of targeted gene expression analysis suitable for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies. Our aim was to assess RT-MLPA for the diagnosis of allograft rejection in heart transplantation.Methods: We performed a cross-sectional, case-control, multicenter study. After the selection of a 14-transcript panel (endothelial burden, Natural killer cells, interferon-γ pathway, effector T-cells, and antigen presentation), RT-MLPA was applied to 183 FFPE endomyocardial biopsies (EMB), randomized into a training (n = 113) and a validation (n = 70) series. A two-step class prediction analysis was developed (Linear prediction score-LPS1: rejection vs non-rejection; LPS2: antibody-mediated rejection [AMR] vs acute cellular rejection [ACR]). A study of the agreement between pathology and RT-MLPA was performed.Results: Overall, 48 ACR, 82 AMR, 5 mixed rejection, and 48 non-rejection EMBs were analyzed. Three molecular clusters were delineated by unsupervised hierarchical analysis (molecular non-rejection, ACR, and AMR). AMR was characterized by the high expression of CCL4, GNLY, FCGR3, CXCL11 and ACR by the high expression of CCL18 and ADAMdec. RT-MLPA and histopathology agreed in the final diagnosis in 82.2%, 67.7%, and 76.8% of the EMB in the test, validation, and overall cohort, respectively. Disagreement cases were more common in the case of histologic low-grade rejection and early post-transplant EMB.Conclusions: RT-MLPA is a suitable technique for targeted gene expression analysis on FFPE EMB with a good overall agreement with the histologic diagnosis of heart allograft rejection

Diuretic dose is a strong prognostic factor in ambulatory patients awaiting heart transplantation

International audienceAims The prognostic value of 'high dose' loop diuretics in advanced heart failure outpatients is unclear. We aimed to assess the prognosis associated with loop diuretic dose in ambulatory patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT). Methods and results All ambulatory patients (n = 700, median age 55 years and 70% men) registered on the French national HT waiting list between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 were included. Patients were divided into 'low dose', 'intermediate dose', and 'high dose' loop diuretics corresponding to furosemide equivalent doses of ≤40, 40-250, and >250 mg, respectively. The primary outcome was a combined criterion of waitlist death and urgent HT. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, creatinine levels, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and pulmonary pressures gradually increased with higher diuretic dose. At 12 months, the risk of waitlist death/urgent HT was 7.4%, 19.2%, and 25.6% (P = 0.001) for 'low dose', 'intermediate dose', and 'high dose' patients, respectively. When adjusting for confounders, including natriuretic peptides, hepatic, and renal function, the 'high dose' group was associated with increased waitlist mortality or urgent HT [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, 1.33 to 3.73; P = 0.002] and a six-fold higher risk of waitlist death (adjusted HR 6.18, 2.16 to 17.72; P 0.05). Conclusions A 'high dose' of loop diuretics is strongly associated with residual congestion and is a predictor of outcome in patients awaiting HT despite adjustment for classical cardiorenal risk factors. This routine variable may be helpful for risk stratification of pre-HT patients

Prognosis value of Forrester's classification in advanced heart failure patients awaiting heart transplantation

International audienceAims: The value of Forrester's perfusion/congestion profiles assessed by invasive catheter evaluation in non-inotrope advanced heart failure patients listed for heart transplant (HT) is unclear. We aimed to assess the value of haemodynamic evaluation according to Forrester's profiles to predict events on the HT waitlist.Methods and results: All non-inotrope patients (n = 837, 79% ambulatory at listing) registered on the French national HT waiting list between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 with right heart catheterization (RHC) were included. The primary outcome was a combined criteria of waitlist death, delisting for aggravation, urgent HT or left ventricular assist device implantation. Secondary outcome was waitlist death. The 'warm-dry', 'cold-dry', 'warm-wet', and 'cold-wet' profiles represented 27%, 18%, 27%, and 28% of patients, respectively. At 12 months, the respective rates of primary outcome were 15%, 17%, 25%, and 29% (P = 0.008). Taking the 'warm-dry' category as reference, a significant increase in the risk of primary outcome was observed only in the 'wet' categories, irrespectively of 'warm/cold' status: hazard ratios, 1.50; 1.06-2.13; P = 0.024 in 'warm-wet' and 1.77; 1. 25-2.49; P = 0.001 in 'cold-wet'.Conclusions: Haemodynamic assessment of advanced HF patients using perfusion/congestion profiles predicts the risk of the combine endpoint of waitlist death, delisting for aggravation, urgent heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation. 'Wet' patients had the worst prognosis, independently of perfusion status, thus placing special emphasis on the cardinal prominence of persistent congestion in advanced HF

Reverse transcriptase multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in endomyocardial biopsies for the diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection

International audienc

Prognosis value of Forrester's classification in advanced heart failure patients awaiting heart transplantation

International audienceAims: The value of Forrester's perfusion/congestion profiles assessed by invasive catheter evaluation in non-inotrope advanced heart failure patients listed for heart transplant (HT) is unclear. We aimed to assess the value of haemodynamic evaluation according to Forrester's profiles to predict events on the HT waitlist.Methods and results: All non-inotrope patients (n = 837, 79% ambulatory at listing) registered on the French national HT waiting list between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 with right heart catheterization (RHC) were included. The primary outcome was a combined criteria of waitlist death, delisting for aggravation, urgent HT or left ventricular assist device implantation. Secondary outcome was waitlist death. The 'warm-dry', 'cold-dry', 'warm-wet', and 'cold-wet' profiles represented 27%, 18%, 27%, and 28% of patients, respectively. At 12 months, the respective rates of primary outcome were 15%, 17%, 25%, and 29% (P = 0.008). Taking the 'warm-dry' category as reference, a significant increase in the risk of primary outcome was observed only in the 'wet' categories, irrespectively of 'warm/cold' status: hazard ratios, 1.50; 1.06-2.13; P = 0.024 in 'warm-wet' and 1.77; 1. 25-2.49; P = 0.001 in 'cold-wet'.Conclusions: Haemodynamic assessment of advanced HF patients using perfusion/congestion profiles predicts the risk of the combine endpoint of waitlist death, delisting for aggravation, urgent heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation. 'Wet' patients had the worst prognosis, independently of perfusion status, thus placing special emphasis on the cardinal prominence of persistent congestion in advanced HF

Risk factors for emergency surgery for diverticulitis: A retrospective multicentric French study at 41 hospitals

International audienceBackgroundThe observed increase in the incidence of complicated diverticulitis may lead to the performance of more emergency surgeries. This study aimed to assess the rate and risk factors of emergency surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis.MethodThe primary outcomes were the rate of emergency surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis and its associated risk factors. The urgent or elective nature of the surgical intervention was provided by the surgeon and in accordance with the indication for surgical treatment. A mixed logistic regression with a random intercept after multiple imputations by the chained equation was performed to consider the influence of missing data on the results.ResultsBetween 2010 and 2021, 6,867 patients underwent surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis in the participating centers, of which one-third (n = 2317) were emergency cases. In multivariate regression analysis with multiple imputation by chained equation, increasing age, body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, neurologic and pulmonary comorbidities, use of anticoagulant drugs, immunocompromised status, and first attack of sigmoid diverticulitis were independent risk factors for emergency surgery. The likelihood of emergency surgery was significantly more frequent after national guidelines, which were implemented in 2017, only in patients with a history of sigmoid diverticulitis attacks.ConclusionThe present study highlights a high rate (33%) of emergency surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis in France, which was significantly associated with patient features and the first attack of diverticulitis

Impact of the first wave of COVID-19 epidemy on the surgical management of sigmoid diverticular disease in France: National French retrospective study

International audienceObjective: To analyze the surgical management of sigmoid diverticular disease (SDD) before, during, and after the first containment rules (CR) for the first wave of COVID-19.Methods: From the French Surgical Association multicenter series, this study included all patients operated on between January 2018 and September 2021. Three groups were compared: A (before CR period: 01/01/18-03/16/20), B (CR period: 03/17/20-05/03/20), and C (post CR period: 05/04/20-09/30/21).Results: A total of 1965 patients (A n = 1517, B n = 52, C n = 396) were included. The A group had significantly more previous SDD compared to the two other groups (p = 0.007), especially complicated (p = 0.0004). The rate of peritonitis was significantly higher in the B (46.1%) and C (38.4%) groups compared to the A group (31.7%) (p = 0.034 and p = 0.014). As regards surgical treatment, Hartmann's procedure was more often performed in the B group (44.2%, vs A 25.5% and C 26.8%, p = 0.01). Mortality at 90 days was significantly higher in the B group (9.6%, vs A 4% and C 6.3%, p = 0.034). This difference was also significant between the A and B groups (p = 0.048), as well as between the A and C groups (p = 0.05). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of postoperative morbidity.Conclusion: This study shows that the management of SDD was impacted by COVID-19 at CR, but also after and until September 2021, both on the initial clinical presentation and on postoperative mortality