More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that about 45% of abstracts that are accepted for presentation at biomedical meetings will subsequently be published in full. The acceptance of abstracts at meetings and their fate after initial rejection are less well understood. We set out to estimate the proportion of abstracts submitted to meetings that are eventually published as full reports, and to explore factors that are associated with meeting acceptance and successful publication. METHODS: Studies analysing acceptance of abstracts at biomedical meetings or their subsequent full publication were searched in MEDLINE, OLDMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, BIOSIS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and by hand searching of bibliographies and proceedings. We estimated rates of abstract acceptance and of subsequent full publication, and identified abstract and meeting characteristics associated with acceptance and publication, using logistic regression analysis, survival-type analysis, and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Analysed meetings were held between 1957 and 1999. Of 14945 abstracts that were submitted to 43 meetings, 46% were accepted. The rate of full publication was studied with 19123 abstracts that were presented at 234 meetings. Using survival-type analysis, we estimated that 27% were published after two, 41% after four, and 44% after six years. Of 2412 abstracts that were rejected at 24 meetings, 27% were published despite rejection. Factors associated with both abstract acceptance and subsequent publication were basic science and positive study outcome. Large meetings and those held outside the US were more likely to accept abstracts. Abstracts were more likely to be published subsequently if presented either orally, at small meetings, or at a US meeting. Abstract acceptance itself was strongly associated with full publication. CONCLUSIONS: About one third of abstracts submitted to biomedical meetings were published as full reports. Acceptance at meetings and publication were associated with specific characteristics of abstracts and meetings

Leveraging physiological data from literature into a pharmacokinetic model to support informative clinical study design in pregnant women

Purpose: Physiological changes during pregnancy can effect pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, which may lead to altered dose requirements. We aimed to leverage literature-based physiological changes during pregnancy into a PK model and compare its performance to a published reference model in pregnant women and to use the literature-based model to determine informative PK sampling times for a clinical study that aims to quantify the PK of enoxaparin throughout pregnancy. Methods: Changes in total body water (BW) and creatinine clearance (CRCL) during pregnancy were described using regression models. BW and CRCL were linked to a PK model of enoxaparin in non-pregnant women. Performance of the literature-based PK model was compared to a previously published empirical reference model. D-optimal sampling times were determined and evaluated for literature-based and reference models. Results: The literature-based model adequately predicted anti-Xa plasma concentrations when compared to reference model predictions. An informative sampling design was succesfully developed, with parameters expected with good precision (RS

Pharmacogenetics, the next challenge for pharmacy?

This commentary draws attention to and raises awareness of forthcoming pharmacogenetic technologies amongst the pharmacy profession. It aims to stimulate debate around the potential role that the pharmacy profession can play in the introduction of pharmacogenetic technologies into primary healthcare. This commentary discusses potential new roles for pharmacists involving pharmacogenetic technologies, giving attention to the way the profession may need to adapt to accommodate these