Letter by Marlu et al Regarding Article, “Reversal of Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran by Prothrombin Complex Concentrate: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects”

International audienc

Letter by Marlu et al Regarding Article, “Reversal of Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran by Prothrombin Complex Concentrate: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects”

International audienc

Better Fields or Currents? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Transcranial Magnetic (rTMS) Versus Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Neuropathic Pain

International audienceWhile high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) is now included in the armamentarium to treat chronic neuropathic pain (NP), direct-current anodal stimulation (a-tDCS) to the same cortical targets may represent a valuable alternative in terms of feasibility and cost. Here we performed a head-to-head, randomized, single-blinded, cross-over comparison of HF-rTMS versus a-tDCS over the motor cortex in 56 patients with drug-resistant NP, who received 5 daily sessions of each procedure, with a washout of at least 4 weeks. Daily scores of pain, sleep, and fatigue were obtained during 5 consecutive weeks, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to a motor task was performed in a subgroup of 31 patients. The percentage of responders, defined by a reduction in pain scores of > 2 SDs from pre-stimulus levels, was similar to both techniques (42.0% vs. 42.3%), while the magnitude of "best pain relief" was significantly skewed towards rTMS. Mean pain ratings in responders decreased by 32.6% (rTMS) and 29.6% (tDCS), with half of them being sensitive to only one technique. Movement-related fMRI showed significant activations in motor and premotor areas, which did not change after 5 days of stimulation, and did not discriminate responders from non-responders. Both HF-rTMS and a-tDCS showed efficacy at 1 month in drug-resistant NP, with magnitude of relief slightly favoring rTMS. Since a significant proportion of patients responded to one procedure only, both modalities should be tested before declaring a patient as unresponsive

Effect of non-specific reversal agents on anticoagulant activity of dabigatran and rivaroxaban

International audienc

Long-term analgesic effect of trans-spinal direct current stimulation compared to non-invasive motor cortex stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome

International audienceAbstract The aim of the present study was to compare the analgesic effect of motor cortex stimulation using high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation and transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Thirty-three patients with complex regional pain syndrome were randomized to one of the three treatment groups (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, n = 11; transcranial direct current stimulation, n = 10; transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation, n = 12) and received a series of 12 sessions of stimulation for 3 weeks (induction phase) and 11 sessions for 4 months (maintenance therapy). The primary end-point was the mean pain intensity assessed weekly with a visual numerical scale during the month prior to treatment (baseline), the 5-month stimulation period and 1 month after the treatment. The weekly visual numerical scale pain score was significantly reduced at all time points compared to baseline in the transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation group, at the last two time points in the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation group (end of the 5-month stimulation period and 1 month later), but at no time point in the transcranial direct current stimulation group. A significant pain relief was observed at the end of induction phase using transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation compared to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (P = 0.008) and to transcranial direct current stimulation (P = 0.003). In this trial, transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation was more efficient to relieve pain in patients with complex regional pain syndrome compared to motor cortex stimulation techniques (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation). This efficacy was found during the induction phase and was maintained thereafter. This study warrants further investigation to confirm the potentiality of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation as a therapeutic option in complex regional pain syndrome

Long-term prophylactic efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic migraine. A randomised, patient-assessor blinded, sham-controlled trial

International audienceObjective: To assess the prophylactic effect of anodal tDCS of the left motor cortex in patients with resistant chronic migraine (CM) and its long-term maintenance.Methods: In a patient-assessor blinded, sham-controlled trial, 36 patients were randomized to receive anodal tDCS (active group, n = 18) or sham tDCS (sham group, n = 18). The studied population was characterized by a previous failure of at least 3 classes of preventive drugs and a mean duration of migraine history of 26 years. The tDCS procedure consisted of an induction phase of 5 consecutive daily sessions (week 1) followed by a maintenance phase of 1 weekly session during the next 4 weeks and two bimonthly sessions in the next month, for a total of 11 sessions during 2 months. Anodal tDCS was delivered at 2 mA intensity for 20 min over the left motor cortex. The primary endpoint was the reduction in the monthly number of migraine attacks from baseline to each period of follow-up (months 1, 2, 3, 5) between the active and sham groups.Results: The monthly number of migraine attacks expressed as the percentage of reduction from baseline was significantly reduced in the active versus the sham group, from the end of first month (-21% ± 22 vs. -2% ±25, p = 0.019) to the end of follow-up (3-month post-treatment) (-32% ± 33 vs. -6% ±39, p = 0.011). At this time, the rate of responders, defined as a reduction of the monthly number of migraine attacks ≥30% from baseline, was significantly higher in the active group than in the sham group (50% vs. 14%, p = 0.043).Conclusion: Our results show a marked prophylactic effect of anodal tDCS of the left motor cortex in resistant CM extending several months after the stimulation period, and suggest that this neuromodulatory approach may be part of the prophylactic alternatives available for CM