Father involvement and socioeconomic disparities in child academic outcomes

OBJECTIVE This article explores whether father involvement can reduce socioeconomic disparities in child academic outcomes. BACKGROUND An emerging body of literature points to the benefits to children of involvement by low‐socioeconomic status (SES) fathers. Research has not systematically investigated whether differences in father involvement can account for SES‐based disparities in child outcomes. METHOD This study used data from 12,030 unique children from the 1998 Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Using multiple regression models and novel simulation analyses, it investigated whether accounting for SES‐based differences in either the amount or effect of involvement by biological fathers explains gaps in reading scores, math scores, and rates of grade retention between low‐SES and high‐SES children. RESULTS Father residence, resident father school involvement, and a comprehensive index of nonresident father involvement were associated with better child academic outcomes. Associations between residence and nonresident father involvement and child outcomes were consistent for fathers in all SES quintiles. School involvement by low‐SES resident fathers was more beneficial than involvement by the highest SES fathers. Simulation analyses indicated that increasing the amount of involvement by low‐SES fathers to that of high‐SES fathers would result in minimal decreases in SES disparities in reading and math scores, but more sizeable decreases in rates of grade retention. CONCLUSION Increasing some types of father involvement may help to narrow academic gaps between low‐ and high‐SES children.Accepted manuscrip

LIFE ON THE OUTSIDE: A MIXED METHODS STUDY OF INCARCERATION AND FAMILY LIFE

After nearly four decades of unabated expansion, mass incarceration in the United States has become the new normal. Contact with the criminal justice system can fundamentally reshape family relationships and resources, and policymakers and families alike are grappling with how best to manage these negative repercussions. Using mixed methods, this dissertation investigates how families’ responses to the challenges of incarceration shape experiences and the wellbeing of different family members over three papers. Each paper further considers how policies can support strategies to mitigate hardship. The first chapter identifies disruptions to father engagement and family resources act as key mechanisms explaining nearly half of the increase in acting-out behavior in children with incarcerated fathers. The second chapter identifies the tradeoffs faced by women after the incarceration of their child’s father, linking variation in maternal wellbeing to whether the parent’s relationship continues, ends, or the mother introduces a new social father to her household. Finally, the third chapter draws from qualitative interviews to categorize three sets of strategies families use to navigate incarceration in a rural county jail. This dissertation concludes family responses to incarceration are consequential for mitigating the negative repercussions faced by different family members. Existing policies, however, may not adequately reflect the complex decisions families face as they attempt to the manage the challenges inherent to the incarceration process