BceAB-type antibiotic resistance transporters appear to act by target protection of cell wall synthesis

Resistance against cell wall-active antimicrobial peptides in bacteria is often mediated by transporters. In low GC-content Gram-positive bacteria, a common type of such transporters are BceAB-like systems, which frequently provide high-level resistance against peptide antibiotics that target intermediates of the lipid II cycle of cell wall synthesis. How a transporter can offer protection from drugs that are active on the cell surface, however, has presented researchers with a conundrum. Multiple theories have been discussed, ranging from removal of the peptides from the membrane, internalisation of the drug for degradation, to removal of the cellular target rather than the drug itself. To resolve this much-debated question, we here investigated the mode-of-action of the transporter BceAB of Bacillus subtilis. We show that it does not inactivate or import its substrate antibiotic bacitracin. Moreover, we present evidence that the critical factor driving transport activity is not the drug itself, but instead the concentration of drug-target complexes in the cell. Our results, together with previously reported findings, lead us to propose that BceAB-type transporters act by transiently freeing lipid II cycle intermediates from the inhibitory grip of antimicrobial peptides, and thus provide resistance through target protection of cell wall synthesis. Target protection has so far only been reported for resistance against antibiotics with intracellular targets, such as the ribosome. However, this mechanism offers a plausible explanation for the use of transporters as resistance determinants against cell wall-active antibiotics in Gram-positive bacteria where cell wall synthesis lacks the additional protection of an outer membrane

BceAB-type antibiotic resistance transporters appear to act by target protection of cell wall synthesis

Resistance against cell wall-active antimicrobial peptides in bacteria is often mediated by transporters. In low GC-content Gram-positive bacteria, a common type of such transporters are BceAB-like systems, which frequently provide high-level resistance against peptide antibiotics that target intermediates of the lipid II cycle of cell wall synthesis. How a transporter can offer protection from drugs that are active on the cell surface, however, has presented researchers with a conundrum. Multiple theories have been discussed, ranging from removal of the peptides from the membrane, internalisation of the drug for degradation, to removal of the cellular target rather than the drug itself. To resolve this much-debated question, we here investigated the mode-of-action of the transporter BceAB of Bacillus subtilis. We show that it does not inactivate or import its substrate antibiotic bacitracin. Moreover, we present evidence that the critical factor driving transport activity is not the drug itself, but instead the concentration of drug-target complexes in the cell. Our results, together with previously reported findings, lead us to propose that BceAB-type transporters act by transiently freeing lipid II cycle intermediates from the inhibitory grip of antimicrobial peptides, and thus provide resistance through target protection of cell wall synthesis. Target protection has so far only been reported for resistance against antibiotics with intracellular targets, such as the ribosome. However, this mechanism offers a plausible explanation for the use of transporters as resistance determinants against cell wall-active antibiotics in Gram-positive bacteria where cell wall synthesis lacks the additional protection of an outer membrane

The <em>Bacillus</em> BioBrick Box:Generation and evaluation of essential genetic building blocks for standardized work with Bacillus subtilis

Background: Standardized and well-characterized genetic building blocks are a prerequisite for the convenient and reproducible assembly of novel genetic modules and devices. While numerous standardized parts exist for Escherichia coli, such tools are still missing for the Gram-positive model organism Bacillus subtilis. The goal of this study was to develop and thoroughly evaluate such a genetic toolbox. Results: We developed five BioBrick-compatible integrative B. subtilis vectors by deleting unnecessary parts and removing forbidden restriction sites to allow cloning in BioBrick (RFC10) standard. Three empty backbone vectors with compatible resistance markers and integration sites were generated, allowing the stable chromosomal integration and combination of up to three different devices in one strain. In addition, two integrative reporter vectors, based on the lacZ and luxABCDE cassettes, were BioBrick-adjusted, to enable beta-galactosidase and luciferase reporter assays, respectively. Four constitutive and two inducible promoters were thoroughly characterized by quantitative, time-resolved measurements. Together, these promoters cover a range of more than three orders of magnitude in promoter strength, thereby allowing a fine-tuned adjustment of cellular protein amounts. Finally, the Bacillus BioBrick Box also provides five widely used epitope tags (FLAG, His(10), cMyc, HA, StrepII), which can be translationally fused N- or C-terminally to any protein of choice. Conclusion: Our genetic toolbox contains three compatible empty integration vectors, two reporter vectors and a set of six promoters, two of them inducible. Furthermore, five different epitope tags offer convenient protein handling and detection. All parts adhere to the BioBrick standard and hence enable standardized work with B. subtilis. We believe that our well-documented and carefully evaluated Bacillus BioBrick Box represents a very useful genetic tool kit, not only for the iGEM competition but any other BioBrick-based project in B. subtilis

Factors Regulating Excystment of Alexandrium in Puget Sound, WA, USA

Factors regulating excystment of a toxic dinoflagellate in the genus Alexandrium were investigated in cysts from Puget Sound, Washington State, USA. Experiments were carried out in the laboratory using cysts collected from benthic seedbeds to determine if excystment is controlled by internal or environmental factors. The results suggest that the timing of germination is not tightly controlled by an endogenous clock, though there is a suggestion of a cyclical pattern. This was explored using cysts that had been stored under cold (4 °C), anoxic conditions in the dark and then incubated for 6 weeks at constant favorable environmental conditions. Excystment occurred during all months of the year, with variable excystment success ranging from 31-90%. When cysts were isolated directly from freshly collected sediments every month and incubated at the in situ bottom water temperature, a seasonal pattern in excystment was observed that was independent of temperature. This pattern may be consistent with secondary dormancy, an externally modulated pattern that prevents excystment during periods that are not favorable for sustained vegetative growth. However, observation over more annual cycles is required and the duration of the mandatory dormancy period of these cysts must be determined before the seasonality of germination can be fully characterized in Alexandrium from Puget Sound. Both temperature and light were found to be important environmental factors regulating excystment, with the highest rates of excystment observed for the warmest temperature treatment (20 °C) and in the light