Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Graft Pseudoaneurysm Using a Duct Occluder Device With Onlay Fusion Guidance

Aortic arch pseudoaneurysms can be caused by previous surgery, infection, or trauma. In select patients with small tears and no evidence of infection, local repair can be performed using an open or endovascular technique.1 Open surgical repeat surgery has increased risks and endovascular repair has been especially appealing for the elderly, higher risk patients, and patients with multiple prior procedures.2 We have reported the use of a ductal occluder device in a patient with a large aortic arch pseudoaneurysm.3 Our patient has provided written informed consent for the report of his case details and imaging studies

Early Feasibility of Endovascular Repair of Distal Aortic Arch Aneurysms Using Patient-Specific Single Retrograde Left Subclavian Artery Branch Stent Graft

OBJECTIVE: To describe the feasibility and outcomes of endovascular repair of distal aortic arch aneurysms using a patient-specific stent graft with a pre-loaded single retrograde left subclavian artery (LSA) branch stent graft. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data and outcomes of consecutive patients enrolled in an ongoing prospective, non-randomized physician-sponsored investigational device exemption study to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular aortic arch repair using patient-specific arch branch stent grafts (William Cook Europe, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) between 2019 and 2022. All patients received a design with triple-wide scallop and a single retrograde LSA branch with a pre-loaded catheter. RESULTS: There were five male patients with median age of 77 years old (72-80) treated using the single LSA branch stent graft. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Median operating time, fluoroscopy time, and total radiation dose area product were 103 (78-134) minutes, 26 (19-39) minutes, and 123 (71-270) mGy.cm CONCLUSION: This early feasibility study demonstrates successful endovascular repair of distal aortic arch aneurysms using a patient-specific stent graft with single retrograde LSA branch without technical failures, mortality or neurological events. Larger clinical experience and longer follow-up are needed to determined effectiveness of this approach in patients who need endovascular repair with proximal extension into Zone 2

Total Transfemoral Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Using 3-Vessel Inner Branch Stent-Graft

Endovascular repair has been introduced to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical repair of aortic arch pathology. We illustrate total percutaneous transfemoral approach with a 3-vessel inner branch stent-graft to treat aortic arch aneurysm. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Low-profile Zenith Alpha™ Thoracic Stent Graft Modification Using Preloaded Wires for Urgent Repair of Thoracoabdominal and Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Background: The aim of this study is to describe a modification technique using the low-profile Cook Zenith Alpha™ thoracic stent graft, and addition of a preloaded wire system, for urgent repair of pararenal (PRA) and thoracoabdominal (TAAA) aortic aneurysms. Methods: We analyzed 20 consecutive patients who underwent urgent physician modified endograft repair (PMEG) of PRA and TAAA at 2 institutions. The low-profile Cook Zenith Alpha Thoracic stent graft was modified in accordance with each specific patient anatomic characteristics. End points were technical success, 30-day mortality, and major adverse events (MAEs). Results: Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%). A total of 76 renal-mesenteric arteries were incorporated by fenestrations (70%) or directional branches (30%) with an average of 3.7 ± 0.6 vessels per patient. There were 6 different types of stent configuration. The most common design consisted of 4 fenestrations (9 patients, 45%). The average of modification time was 110 ± 27 minutes. Total procedure time (including the time for open component) was 242 ± 75 minutes. There was no death within the first 30 days or hospital stay. MAEs occurred in 10 patients (50%). The most common MAEs were acute kidney injury (by Risk, Injury, and Failure; and Loss; and End-stage kidney disease criteria) in 6 patients (30%), estimated blood loss >1 L, respiratory failure requiring reintubation in 2 patients (10%) each, and paraplegia and ischemic colitis in 1 patient (5%) each. One patient (5%) required temporary, new-onset dialysis. Conclusions: PMEG using low-profile Zenith Alpha thoracic stent graft was safe with no early mortality and acceptable early morbidity. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Should endovascular approach be considered as the first option for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms?

Open surgical repair has been the gold standard for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). The technique of open TAAA repair has evolved from the use of "island" patch incorporation to separate branch vessel bypass, from "clamp and go" to routine use of distal perfusion, and towards more extensive repair in patients with connective tissue disorders. Open TAAA repair can be done with excellent results in highly specialized centers. However, these operations continue to carry excessive risk when performed outside large aortic centers, with 30-day mortality estimated on 20% according to statewide and national databases. In octogenarians. the mortality of elective open TAAA repair can be up to 40%. Endovascular repair was introduced as an alternative to open surgical repair in the elderly or higher risk patients using hybrid reconstruction, parallel grafts or fenestrated and branched endografts. Several large aortic centers have developed dedicated clinical programs to advance techniques of fenestrated-branched endovascular repair using patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices. offering a minimally invasive alternative to open repair allowing treatment of increasingly older and sicker TAAA patients. During the last decade, improvements in device design, patient selection, spinal cord injury protocols, and perioperative management have contributed to a continued decline in morbidity and mortality of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair, challenging open surgical repair as the new "gold standard" for treatment of TAAAs. Despite the improved results, endovascular repair is a highly technical procedure that requires vast experience, involves a significant risk of complications, and also, has an impact on patients' physical quality of life. In this article, we review the current technical aspects of endovascular TAAA repair with the main focus on the evidence of open versus endovascular outcomes of TAAA repair