How risky is caring for emergency patients at risk of malpractice litigation: a population based epidemiological study of Taiwan's experiences

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Emergency medicine has generally been considered a high risk specialty. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of being sued in the district courts for caring emergency room (ER) patients from the perspective of epidemiology.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This research was designed to be a retrospective population based cohort study. We intended to find out the incidence of litigations arising from ER patients and that of birth inpatients in Taiwan, and computed their relative risks. The inclusion criterion was set to be incidents transpired in the time period of 1998 to 2002. The study materials included the reimbursement claim dataset of the National Health Insurance from 1998 to 2002, and the district court decision database of the Judicial Yuan from 1999 to 2006.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The average annual incidence rate of becoming a plaintiff for ER patients is 0.86 per million, and for birth patients is 33.5 per million. There is a statistically significant difference between birth patients and ER patients. The relative risk comparing ER patients against birth inpatients is 0.03.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The findings of this population based study indicate that the patient population emergency physicians are facing in Taiwan have relatively lower risks of developing litigation in comparison with the patients that come to give birth. Due to the large volume of ER patients, malpractice still pose a major threat in the emergency department, and misdiagnosis remains the major complaint of plaintiffs in subsequent litigations.</p

Towards integration of general practitioner posts and accident and emergency departments: a case study of two integrated emergency posts in the Netherlands

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Accident and emergency (A&E) departments and general practitioner (GP) posts are often used inappropriately, leading to overcrowding. In the Netherlands, increasingly more integrated emergency posts (IEPs) are being created, integrating the care provided by GP posts and A&E departments, in order to improve the provision of the emergency care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This explorative study compares the efficiency and patient and employee satisfaction in IEPs with those in two GP posts and two A&E departments. To this end, information was retrieved from hospital and GP patient records for the first quarter of the year before and of the year after the creation of IEPs. Patients and employees were sent a questionnaire to measure their satisfaction. Lastly, groups of hospital doctors, GPs, GP assistants, and nurses were interviewed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After the creation of IEPs, there was a shift of more than fifteen percent from secondary care to primary care for emergency consultations and waiting/consultation times were shortened by more than ten percent. Compared with the control settings, patients were more satisfied about telephone contact with an IEP, but professionals working at the IEP were less satisfied with several aspects of their work.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>IEPs could be a promising innovation to organize emergency care more efficiently; however, it might take time to convince professionals of the possible advantages. Studies involving more IEPs and longer follow-up times are needed to determine whether such integration should be stimulated.</p

Spoedeisende Geneeskunde. Patiëntkarakteristieken en behoefte aan een opleiding tot SEH-arts.

Contains fulltext : 53301.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)RU Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 19 september 2007Promotor : Vugt, A.B. van Co-promotor : Simons, M.P.142 p

Karakteristieken van patiënten op de shockroom van een afdeling Spoedeisende Hulp in het centrum van Amsterdam.

Item does not contain fulltex

A description of emergency department-related malpractice claims in The Netherlands: closed claims study 1993-2001.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the quality of care provided at emergency departments (ED) in the Netherlands by analysing medical liability insurance claims. METHODS: A retrospective study performed by reviewing records at MediRisk, presently the largest insurer for medical liability in the Netherlands. The following data were abstracted from the files available for analysis: medical discipline involved, physician involved (resident or consultant), nature and gravity of the complaint, and final claim disposition. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 2001 a total of 326 claims involving the ED were filed at MediRisk. Of these, 256 claims (79%) were closed and were available for analysis. Medical liability claims were filed primarily for alleged errors in diagnosis and treatment. The majority of claims involved minor surgical conditions: fractures, luxations (joint dislocations), wounds and tendon injuries (210/256, 82%). Residents were involved in 76% of the claims; resident supervision by a consultant was documented in only 15% of the medical records. Permanent patient disability resulting from improper ED treatment was alleged in 22% of the claims. Four per cent of the claims involved the death of a patient. Physicians accepted liability in 16% of the claims filed. Indemnity payments during the 8-year study period totalled Euros 504,000. CONCLUSION: The number of medical liability claims is low compared with the number of patients treated in ED in the Netherlands. Claims primarily concerned alleged mistakes in diagnosis and the treatment of minor trauma. Residents were involved in the majority of the claims. More resident supervision is needed, as are specific training programmes for emergency physicians

Emergency department patient characteristics: Potential impact on emergency medicine residency programs in the Netherlands.

Contains fulltext : 49407.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)OBJECTIVES: We set out to study emergency department patient characteristics at a busy level-2 trauma center, to gain insight into the practise of emergency medicine, which is not yet recognized as a specialty in the Netherlands. METHODS: From May 27 to July 4 2001, the following data were recorded from the charts of all patients presenting to the emergency department: age, time and form of presentation, diagnostics, treatment, disposition and the single best diagnosis (International Classification of Disease-10 classification). RESULTS: The majority (84%) of the 5234 patients (134/day) patients seen were self-referred and treated by the emergency department physician. The remaining 16% were referred, usually by their general practitioner, directly to a specialty service, which saw them in the emergency department. Self-referred patients tended to be younger (average 33 years), with minor trauma, and infrequently required diagnostics (37%), treatment (49%) or admission (4%). The referred patients were older (average 50 years), with 41% needing admission. Only 16% of all patients were under 16 years of age. In all, there were five deaths (referred patients), 12 resuscitations, seven intubations, seven chest tube insertions and no lumbar punctures performed during the study period. CONCLUSION: The acuity of self-referred patients seen by the emergency physicians is low, with little diagnostic testing and few interventions and resuscitations, even in a busy center. This has both training and practise implications and it may be inappropriate to take an emergency medicine practise model or curriculum from another country based on its emergency department population